470 likes | 610 Views
Command / Query Responsibility Segregation. Udi Dahan – The Software Simplist Session Code: ARC 304. What will you see here?. Distributed Systems Architecture UI Design Domain Model. What won’t you see here?. Code. Distributed Systems Architecture. Common Distributed Architecture. DB.
E N D
Command / Query Responsibility Segregation Udi Dahan – The Software Simplist Session Code: ARC 304
What will you see here? • Distributed Systems Architecture • UI Design • Domain Model What won’t you see here? • Code
Collaboration is good – isn’t it ? Get data Get data User is looking at stale data Change data
So why go through all the layers? Cache DB
Why transform between tiers? Cache UI WS DB Map from DTOs & WS to view model Map from DTOs and WS to domain object Use EF to map from tables to domain objects
Why not be upfront about it? List of customers Data correct as of 10 minutes ago
Keep it simple - 2-Tier UI Query only Persistent View Model For each view in the UI, have a view in the DB
Validation and Business Rules • Validation: Is the input potentially good? Structured correctly? Ranges, lengths, etc • Rules: Should we do this? Based on the current system state What the user saw is irrelevant
Command Processing Tiers Transaction Get current state Command WS Input DB Persist Validation Validation Rules
Traditional User Interfaces Orders Save Cancel
Capturing user intent • Why is it important? Differentiating between: Correcting a mistyped shipping address The user moved – reroute shipments underway • Sometimes users accidentally modify fields when tabbing between columns
Not capturing user intent • In a traditional UI – what we have is the checkbox • Why do users select multiple seats? Because they’re reserving for a family / friends • But then, concurrency happens Somebody else got in first on one of the seats • Try to find a block of seats somewhere else
Capturing user intent • Group reservation: • Small group – sitting together • Large group – several small groups • Enter number of people • Enter preferred seat type – indicates cost • System emails back when reservation can be filled Include waiting list functionality
Usability benefits More users get what they want with less clicks
Scalability benefits Thousands of seats, hundreds of thousands of requests No need to show actual status
What’s a good command? • The kind you can reply with: “Thank you. Your confirmation email will arrive shortly” • Inherently asynchronous • Not really related to an entity
Commands versus Entities • It’s easier to validate the command • Less data • More specific • Is this potentially good • Validating large entities is complex
What aren’t they for? • Validation Commands are validated before the domain model is called • Queries Entity relationships for reading are unnecessary
What are they for? • Answering the question: Should I do what this valid command is asking? • If the answer is yes, change its state
Queries View Model Queries Commands WS Input DB Validation Validation Rules
For better scalability, add pub/sub Queries View Model Queries Commands Publish WS Input Validation Validation Rules Cache Updater DB
Summary • Keep queries simple – 2-Tier if possible • No data transfer objects • Have commands reflect user intent • Adjust UI design to capture intent • Get the benefits of asynchronous programming • Simple validation, focused business rules
Thank you • Udi Dahan – The Software Simplist • Enterprise Development Expert & SOA Specialist • www.UdiDahan.com • email@UdiDahan.com
Required Slide Speakers, TechEd 2009 is not producing a DVD. Please announce that attendees can access session recordings at TechEd Online. Resources • www.microsoft.com/teched Sessions On-Demand & Community • www.microsoft.com/learning • Microsoft Certification & Training Resources • http://microsoft.com/technet • Resources for IT Professionals • http://microsoft.com/msdn Resources for Developers
Complete an evaluation on CommNet and enter to win an Xbox 360 Elite!
Required Slide © 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.