1 / 6

Bristol Wind-blown plume model

Bristol Wind-blown plume model. Mark Woodhouse, Andrew Hogg, Jeremy Phillips and Steve Sparks.

blossom-hines
Download Presentation

Bristol Wind-blown plume model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bristol Wind-blown plume model Mark Woodhouse, Andrew Hogg, Jeremy Phillips and Steve Sparks

  2. To forecast the spreading of ash in the atmosphere, knowledge of the height at which material spreads laterally (the plume height, H) and the rate at which ash is delivered from the volcano (the source mass flux, Q) is needed. Q and H are related through the dynamics of buoyant plume rise. For volcanic eruptions, the relationship between Q and H has been calibrated using historical eruptions. An observation of plume height can then be used to estimate the source mass flux. This is the approach currently used during volcanic eruptions. However, this approach does not account for the meteorological effect on plume rise.

  3. Wind has a very strong on weak effect on volcanic plumes, as demonstrated at Kirishima volcano, Japan (left) and at Eyjafjallajökull, Iceland (below). Wind enhances the mixing of the volcanic material (gases and ash) with the air and so reduces the height of plume rise. Simple mathematical models of volcanic plumes have been used extensively to understand the dynamics of plumes rising in calm environments. We’ve extended these models to include the effects of wind. Eyjafjallajökull Weak plume Katla Strong plume V = 0 m/s V = 10 m/s V = 20 m/s V = 30 m/s V = 40 m/s

  4. Using our wind-blown plume model, we can estimate a source flux at Eyjafjallajökull using plume heights observed using a weather radar. Much of the variation in plume height (given measurement error) can be captured by wind-blown plume model with a constant source mass flux. Wind speed measurement Plume height Radar observation (denoted by ●) Match plume height from model to observation by varying source mass flux at 1200 on 14th April. Source mass flux This gives an estimate of the source mass flux. Now fix the source mass flux, but allow meteorological input to vary.

  5. Our results could have very significant implications for airspace management. Our model estimates a source mass flux that is a factor of 10, or even 100, larger than the estimate from the simple curve fit. Ash dispersion 25 hrs after start of eruption. Source flux estimated from curve fit (no wind effect) Estimate from our model with wind Factor of 7 Factor of 35 Factor of 100 Airspace closed “safe” for flights Ash concentration (arbitrary units)

  6. Try using our model yourself at www.plumerise.bris.ac.uk

More Related