Mentally review now!

1. Mentally review now! Can you Match? Summarize where the line is drawn? Mappv. Ohio (1961) New Jersey v. TLO (1985) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Kelo v. New London (2005) Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) Roe v. Wade (1973) Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989) Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) Gonzales v. Carhart Lawrence v. Texas (2003) United States v. Windsor (2012) Plessyv. Ferguson (1896) Brown v. Board (1st and 2nd) (1954/55) Korematsu v. United States (1944) Shelby County v. Holder (2012) • Engel v. Vitale (1962) • Abington School District v. Schempp (1963) • Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) • Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith (1990) • Zelman v. Simmons – Harris (2002) • Near v. Minnesota (1931) • NY Times v. US (1971) • Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) • Schenck v. US (1919) • Gitlow v. New York (1925) • Tinker v. DesMoines (1969) • Texas v. Johnson (1989) • Buckley v. Valeo (1976) • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) • Miller v. California (1972) • Bethel v. Fraser (1986) • Ashcroft v. ACLU (2004)

2. Review Day 4 Determine whether each answer is True or False. If it’s FALSE, change the underlined phrase to make it true. • T or F? Near v. Minnesota determined that the government may not restrict the press from publishing classified information unless there is a direct threat to the safety of American forces. • T or F? In Lawrence v. Texas, the court struck down sodomy laws using the equal protection clause. • T or F? Tinker v. DesMoines set the precedent for the protection of symbolic speech. • T or F? Schenck v. US established the exclusionary rule. • T or F? Brown v. Board of Education struck down segregation in the military. • T or F? Plessy v. Ferguson established the principle of separate but equal. • T or F? Gitlow v. NY established the precedent of incorporation. • T or F? Kelo v. New London established that the government had the right to take private land and sell to private developers based on their right to double jeopardy.

3. Baker v. Carr (1962) • Shaw v. Reno (1993) • Bush v. Gore (2000)

4. Affirmative Action Defined: Policy that attempts to prevent discrimination by forcing employers and universities to hire a certain percentage of minority groups or to give them compensatory preferential treatment. Issue – the effect of past discrimination? Problems caused by past discrimination Lack of education, jobs, promotions

5. Affirmative Action (Cont.) Work force must reflect local population Correct or prevent inequalities Must hire or promote workers Minorities Women Quotas required

6. CASES: Affirmative Action • Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) • Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) • Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

7. Later Cases Adarand Construction v. Pena 1995 Made it almost impossible to use affirmative action programs Preferential treatment based on race unconstitutional Use of race injures the person discriminated against

8. Key Clauses: Equal Protection • Quasi-suspect class (heightened scrutiny) • Sex is the category here • Not quite as high as race • States must show that the law bears some relation to important governmental objectives

9. Random Others… • US v. Lopez (1995) • US v. Nixon (1974) • Clinton v. New York (1998) • Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) • DC v. Heller (2008) • Don’t forget • Marbury v. Madison • McCulloch v. Maryland • Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) • Barron v. Baltimore (1833)

10. Mix and Match Cases! • Pick a station to start. At that station, match the court case to the important aspect of the precedent. • Help each other by explaining what you remember about each case as you go. • When finished at a station, check yourself with your notes and move to another station with another color.