1 / 23

State of Minnesota Economic Outlook: Implications for the System

State of Minnesota Economic Outlook: Implications for the System. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities January 4, 2010. Fiscal year 2010 budget gaps. Spending cuts as percentage of actions. Use of ARRA funds as percentage of actions. Fiscal year 2011 budget gaps.

bobby
Download Presentation

State of Minnesota Economic Outlook: Implications for the System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State of Minnesota Economic Outlook: Implications for the System Minnesota State Colleges and Universities January 4, 2010

  2. Fiscal year 2010 budget gaps

  3. Spending cuts as percentage of actions

  4. Use of ARRA funds as percentage of actions

  5. Fiscal year 2011 budget gaps

  6. Fiscal year 2012 budget gaps

  7. State of Minnesota forecast revenue: fiscal years 2010-2011 Source: November Economic Forecast, Minnesota Management and Budget, November 2009.

  8. Minnesota Is Facing Significant Long-Term Budget Problems

  9. Problems Remain for 2012-13 Biennium • Assumes: • GAMC discontinued. Restoration adds $928 million. • K-12 Aid shift restored. Delay saves $1.167 billion. • No repayment of K-12 property tax recognition shift. Repayment would cost $562 million. • No discretionary inflation. Inflation at CPI (2.1 percent in 2012 and 1.9 percent in 2013) would increase spending by $1.179 billion. Source: November Economic Forecast, Minnesota Management and Budget, November 2009.

  10. Economic/Demographic Environment Has Changed • Short run economic cycle has merged with long run demographic cycle. • We have entered the Age of Entitlement—economic growth in the next 25 years will be about half what it was in the past 25. • State revenue growth will slow while spending pressures will accelerate. • This is a national/global issue. Source: “But…What About Tomorrow?”, presentation to LCPFP Balanced Budget Subcommittee, October 2009.

  11. Minnesota Faces a Fiscal Trap • The issue is a long run, structural one— short run solutions will not solve the problem. • Trend growth alone will not be sufficient. Fundamental changes are necessary. • Revenue growth will slow. Efforts to increase it will be met with resistance. • Spending pressures will increase driven largely by issues of aging and health. • State spending will shift its focus from education, infrastructure and higher education to care and support of the aging. Source: “But…What About Tomorrow?”, presentation to LCPFP Balanced Budget Subcommittee, October 2009.

  12. 2007-09 Recession Permanently Reduced the Base for Future Revenues Source: “But…What About Tomorrow?”, presentation to LCPFP Balanced Budget Subcommittee, October 2009.

  13. Next 25 Years--State Revenue Growth Rate Projected To Slow Budget Trends Commission, 2009

  14. From 2010 to 2020, Minnesota will see large increases age 50s and 60s Source: Minnesota State Demographic Center, rev 2007 Numbers are rounded

  15. Budget pressures will change --more 65+ than school age by 2020 Census counts & State Demographer projection, revised 2007

  16. If state health care costs continue their current trend, state spending on other services can’t grow General Fund Spending Outlook, presentation to the Budget Trends Commission, August 2008, Dybdal, Reitan and Broat

  17. How do we get out of this fiscal trap? • Revenue growth will depend increasingly on per capita economic growth. • Future economic growth will depend increasingly on increasing productivity and less on labor force size. • This plays to Minnesota’s historic strength. Source: “But…What About Tomorrow?”, presentation to LCPFP Balanced Budget Subcommittee, October 2009.

  18. Impact to the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

  19. Higher education share of state’s budget Fiscal year 2011 estimate includes unallotment. Higher education includes the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, the University of Minnesota, and the Minnesota Office of Higher Education.

  20. State appropriation per FYE student During past decade, appropriation per FYE student has decreased $765 (16 percent); adjusted for inflation decrease is $1,759 (36.5 percent) Fiscal year 2011 estimate includes unallotment.

  21. Minnesota state colleges and universities share of state budget • The System’s share of the state budget is 3.9 percent. • State budget deficit for fiscal years 2012-2013: $5.426 billion to $8.095 billion (if other budget pressures such as GAMC, inflation, etc., are recognized). • The System’s share of the budget deficit: • Solved with spending cuts only: $211.6 million to $315.7 million. • Solved with combination of spending cuts and tax increases: $105.8 million to $157.8 million.

  22. Minnesota state colleges and universities strategy • Revenue growth • Tuition increase greatest potential • Enrollment growth • Enrollment growth will pressure overall revenue outlook • Productivity

  23. System’s strategic focus 2010 Action Plan • Reaching the Underrepresented • STEM and Healthcare • Minnesota Online & e-Learning • Workforce of the Future • Organizational Change • Energy Conservation

More Related