760 likes | 1.39k Views
Penetrating Neck Injuries: Mandatory Exploration vs. Nonoperative Management. Bradley J. Phillips, MD Burn-Trauma-ICU Adults & Pediatrics. Debate Continues……….
E N D
Penetrating Neck Injuries:Mandatory Exploration vs. Nonoperative Management Bradley J. Phillips, MD Burn-Trauma-ICU Adults & Pediatrics
Debate Continues……… “ Some authors have advocated mandatory exploration of all penetrating neck wounds on the basis that serious injury can exist in the absence of clinical findings. Others have advocated a selective approach, operating only upon patients whose finds suggest a major vascular or visceral injury.” A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979, 19:391
Overview – Penetrating Neck Injuries • Management based on “Neck Zones” • Background • Rationale for and against • General clinical diagnosis • Specific injuries – Diagnosis and Management • Carotid • Zone II – Mandatory Exploration vs. Selective Nonoperative • Vertebral • Esophagus • Larynx
A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979 • Retrospective study • 189 patients from 1970 -1977 • GSW = 49, SW = 140 • Treatment options • Based on location of neck wound
A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979 • Neck zones • Considered level of entrance wound important part of preoperative evaluation • Based on involved vascular structures where distal or proximal control viewed as difficult • Obtained arteriography on all patients with high or low neck wounds • Vascular injury may not obvious • Plan appropriate operative approach to minimize bleeding
Zone III Zone II Zone I Penetrating Neck Zones A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979, 19:391
A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979 • Clinical findings • 74 % had one or more signs of vascular, UGI or airway injury • hemorrhage (50%) • hematoma (34%) • shock (15%) • neurologic signs (12%) • 26 % no signs (only 6 % had positive explorations)
A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979 • Location of wounds • Middle zone (98 pts) • Low or high zone (91 pts) • Treatments • Middle zone – immediate exploration • Low or high zone – angiogram if stable (62 pts) • negative = 47 • positive = 14 • false positive = 1 • false negative = 0
A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979 • Results • 35 patients not explored • 154 patients explored • 47% positive findings • GSW 59% • SW 43% • 123 repairs performed • Venous – 46 • Arterial – 36 • Airway – 26 • Esophageal – 3 • Miscellaneous - 11
A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979 • Mortality (2.6 %) • Positive explorations = 2.6 % • Observation = 0% • Negative exploration = 0% • Morbidity (5.3%) • Observation = 0 % • Negative exploration = 4 % • Positive exploration = 7 %
A.J. Roon and N. Christensen, Evaluation and Treatment of Penetrating Cervical Injuries, J Trauma, 1979 • Conclusions • All patients with wounds penetrating the platysma should have a neck exploration • Patients with high or low wounds should have preoperative arteriograms if they are stable • Time to exploration • no arteriogram = 2.4 hrs • arteriogram = 4.8 hrs • Angiogram changed approach ( 6 %) • Repair all vascular injuries, unless carotid occluded • Lower mortality with mandatory exploration (?) • Observation = 0 % (required more radiological studies, time, effort, cost) • 2.6 % compared to reported 10-30% with selective observation
Neck Zone Concept Outdated ? • Location of skin wound not a reliable indictor of underlying injuries • Length of neck makes it impractical to divide into three short zones • Wounds often occur at border between zones and difficult to classify
Epidemiology of Penetrating Neck Injuries • 40% do not involve important structures • Types • GSW 50% (direct and indirect damage) • SW 45% • Shotgun 5% • Structures involved • major vein 15-25% • major artery 10-15% • pharynx or esophagus 5-15% • larynx or trachea 4-12% • major nerves 3-8%
Stab vs. Gunshot Wounds • Anecdotal suggestion • explore GSW, non-operative SW • not supported in literature • Prospective study (Demetriades et al, Br J Surg, 1993) • 97 GSW, 89 SW • GSW higher incidence of clinical signs than knives (35% vs. 19%) • GSW more likely injuries • therapeutic operation: GSW 16.5%, SW 10.1%
Clinical Diagnosis – Neck Injuries • Significant injuries often asymptomatic • 25% positive symptoms and 25% positive signs • PE is often deceptively negative for severe injury • Symptoms variable and delayed • internal carotid artery > 2 weeks • esophageal • Weigelt et al, Am J Surg, 1987; 154:619 • 3/10 no signs or symptoms • laryngeal • more likely to have presenting symptoms/signs • voice change, SOB, hemoptysis
Case #1 • 21 yom with GSW to right neck without exit site • c/o pain in throat/right neck • VS : HR 110, BP 130/70, RR 27 sats 98% (40%) • PE: • mild swelling right neck, non-pulsetile • Management options ? • observation (physical exam based) • selective approach • diagnostic approach • mandatory exploration
“Hard” Active or pulsetile bleeding Expanding hematoma Bruit or thrill Neurologic deficit (unilateral) Deficit pulse exam Hypotension “Soft” Nonexpanding hematoma Paresthesias Clinical Signs – Vascular Injury
Physical Exam – Missed Injuries • Fogelman MJ and Stewart RD , Am J Surg,1956, 91:581 • 100 consecutive patients • 43% hemodynamically stable • 70% no sign of bleeding • Carducci et al, Ann Emerg Med, 1985, 15:208 • 1/3 of patients without signs/symptoms • Apffelstaedt et al, World J Surg, 1994, 18:917 • Prospective study, 335 patients • SW penetrating platysma • clinical signs absent 30% of positive neck explorations
Physical Exam - Reliable Diagnosis • Demetriades et al, Br J Surg, 1993 • Prospective, 335 patients, detailed written protocol • 7/335 required angiography • 269/335 non - operatively managed • 2 required subsequent operations for vascular injury • no complications • Demetriades et al, World J Surg, 1996, 21:41 • Prospective, 223 patients, strict written protocol • 160/223 - no clinical signs underwent angiogram • no vascular injury requiring treatment (NPV 100%)
Physical Exam – Reliable Diagnosis • Biffl et al, Am J Surg, 1997, 174:678 • Prospective, 312 patients with penetrating neck injuries • Immediate OR = 105 (symptomatic) • 16 % non-therapeutic • Observation only = 207 (asymptomatic) • 1 delayed operation for esophageal perforation • Sekharan et al, J Vasc Surg, 2000, 32:483 • Prospective, 145 Zone II injuries • Immediate OR = 31 patients (hard signs) • 90% with major arterial/venous injury requiring repair • Observation = 91 patients • Arteriography = 23 patients • 1 required operative repair of common carotid artery
Penetrating Neck Trauma - Radiographic Options • Arteriography • “gold standard” • no or minimal complications • Controversial • Duplex scan • CT angiogram
Angiography • Recommended in Zone I and III • difficult to assess clinically • difficulty surgical exploration • Policy reduces non-therapeutic intervention • Costs (Demetriades et al, Br J Surg, 1993) • Zone I only 5% required operation • Zone III only 13% required operation
Zone I Injuries - Angiography • Eddy, et al, J Trauma, 2000, 48:208 • ? Mandatory angiography in all Zone I injuries • Retrospective over 10 years, 138 patients • Arteriography vs. Physical exam/CXR • Results • 28 arterial injuries identified • 36 patients had normal PE and CXR • No arterial injuries identified in PE/CXR group
Penetrating Neck Injuries - Duplex • Demetriades et al, Arch Surg, 1995, 130:971 • Prospective, 82 stable patients with neck wounds • Angiography and color flow doppler imaging • Zones: I - 30%, II - 53%, III - 31% • Angiography • Identified 11 lesions, 2 required repair • Doppler • Identified 10 lesions, missed intimal tear in CCA • 91% sensitive, 99 % specific • 100% for clinically important lesions
Penetrating Neck Injuries - Duplex • Ginzberg et al, Arch Surg, 1996, 131:691 • Prospective, 55 stable penetrating neck wounds • Duplex ultrasonography in all patients • Compared results with arteriography or OR findings • Results • Duplex • Normal - 76% • Abnormal – 24% ( 11 truly abnormal, 2 false positive) • Outcomes • NPV 100% • PPV 85%
Penetrating Neck Injuries – CT Angiogram • Gracias et al, Arch Surg, 2001, 136:1231 • Retrospective, 23 stable patients with neck injuries • Helical CT angiogram for trajectory determination • Results • 13/23 had trajectories remote to vital structures • No further intervention • 10/23 underwent angiogram (3 required embolization) • Outcomes • No adverse outcome • Prolonged time to angiogram via CT (added 1.5 hrs) • 4 discharge from ED
Zone II Injuries – CT Angiogram • Mazolewski et al, J Trauma, 2001, 136:1231 • Prospective, 14 stable Zone II injuries • Helical CT angiogram then exploration • Surgeons predicted 4/14 significant injuries by CT scan • Results • 3/14 patients with significant injuries • Correlated with CT findings • Outcomes • Sensitivity 100%, NPV 100%
Management - Mandatory Exploration • Mandatory exploration • Advantages • decreased injuries • up to 25% unexpected injuries found • low morbidity/mortality • Disadvantages • report up 67% negative exploration • Recommendations • Zone II injuries with/without instability • GSW that cross midline
Supportive – Mandatory Exploration • Meyer et al, Arch Surg, 1987, 122:592 • Prospectively studies 120 Zone II injuries • Emergent OR = 7 • Diagnostic evaluation followed by neck exploration = 113 • Arteriography • Barium swallow and flexible esophagoscopy • Laryngoscopy • Outcome accuracy • Clinical assessment = 86 % • Diagnostic assessment = 94 % • Operative assessment = 100 % • Complications = 6%, Mortality = 0.8%
Management - Selective Approach • If hemodynamically stable • angiography, contrast study, endoscopy , laryngoscopy • Exploration if positive study • Negative neck exploration 20% • Disadvantages • cost and time • iatrogenic (CVA, esophageal perforations)
Supportive – Selective Approach • Jurkovich et al, Trauma, 1985, 25:819 • Missed injuries negligible • Sofianos et al, Surgery, 1996, 120:785 • Prospectively studied 75 Zone II injuries • Immediate operation = 40 (hard signs present) • Selective approach = 35 • Only 11 had either arteriography, contrast swallow, or endoscopy • No incidence of missed injury, morbidity, or mortality
Transcervical GSW • More likely to involve vital structures • 73% vs. 31% (GSW not cross midline) • Hirshberg et al, Am J Surg 1994 • retrospective 41 patients • 30(83%) positive for cervical injury • recommends mandatory exploration • Demetriades et al, J of Trauma, 1997 • prospective, 33 patients • 73% injury to vital organ, only 21% therapeutic operation
Treatment Options – Carotid Artery Injuries • Carotid injuries • 22% of penetrating cervical vascular injuries • mortality 10-20% (in-hospital) • Repair vs. ligation • repair if possible in absence of neurologic deficits • prefer saphenous vein, but prosthetics ok • if internal carotid injuries, transposition of external carotid • ligation in neurologically intact for high internal carotid injury if very difficult or impossible
Carotid Artery Transposition Repair ICA Stump
Treatment Options – Neurologic Deficits • Presence of neurologic deficits • controversial • ? concern of post-vascularization hemorrhagic infarct • increased risk if evidence of severe anemic infarct or edema • recommend repair • if deficits are short of coma • no evidence of anemic infarct • patent distal carotid
Treatment – Intimal Flaps • Minor carotid injuries (intimal flaps) • natural history not known • controversial: observation vs. aggressive approach • ? role of duplex for decision making • role of anti-platelet unproven, but used
Management – Vertebral Artery Injuries • Vertebral artery • increased frequency secondary liberal angiography • 10% of major vascular injuries • 67% have association with major cervical injury mainly spine • isolate injury asymptomatic in 1/3 patients • thrombosis rarely lead to neurologic sequelae • angiographic embolization standard of care if bleeding
Complications – Vertebral Artery Injuries • Nonoperative Management • delayed bleeding • CVA (dissection, emboli) • pseudoaneurysm • sepsis (missed esophageal leak) • Operative Management • injury to nerves (vagus, hypoglossal, recurrent) • blood loss • missed injury (particularly esophageal)
Summary Treatment - Vascular Injury • Surgical exploration unstable and stable Zone II (board answer) • Angiography Zone I and III • ? Nonoperative management stable Zone II • depends on expertise and facilities • Other interventions • embolization high carotid or vertebral artery • endovascular stent (pseudoaneurysms) • anticoagulation blunt carotid/vertebral artery
Diagnosis – Esophageal Injuries • Blunt esophageal injury rare • High index of suspicion in blunt trauma • Penetrating trauma • evaluation part of a complete work-up • If missed, high morbidity/mortality
Esophageal Injury - Diagnostic Test • Contrast swallow • Extravasation is diagnostic • Negative study is not reliable (particular in neck with gastrograffin) • 50% of leaks missed with gastrograffin • 25% of leaks missed with barium