310 likes | 394 Views
Setting Up & Getting Started. Objectives. “Big Picture” of Response to Intervention Share my district’s experiences researching, designing, and implementing RTI “How to” approach Questions and answers. Decision to Implement. Learned about RTI
E N D
Objectives • “Big Picture” of Response to Intervention • Share my district’s experiences researching, designing, and implementing RTI • “How to” approach • Questions and answers
Decision to Implement • Learned about RTI • Decision made by Superintendent after conversations about it • Based on district data – program evaluationof basic skills program • New Jersey: not a state initiative
3 Step Process • Conduct Research • Form District-Wide Committee • Needs Assessment
Step 1:Secondary Research • RTI is a general education initiative • Related research and information came from those involved with Special Education • Predominant sources: NASP, NASDSE • State/district initiatives: many state driven
What is RTI? • Framework involving a multi-tier system of intervention options designed to assist children exhibiting academic and/or behavioral difficulties • Integrated approach – collaboration between general and special education
Federal Legislation • Outlined in Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) – Part of a process used in determining a Specific Learning Disability (SLD) – Up to 15% of funds can be used for RTI – Citation: [P.L. 108-446, 614 (b)(6)(A)] • No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Core Principles of RTI • High quality, research supported, scientifically based curriculum and instructional practices • Data driven decision making: initial assessments/screen, diagnostics, continuous progress monitoring • Problem solving, team-based approach
3 Tier Model Behavioral Academic
Tier 1: A Closer Look • Universal screening • Curriculum based measurements (CBM) • Student data against benchmarks withincurricular and instructional processes • Interventions within classroom setting by classroom teacher
Tier 2: A Closer Look • Targeted short-term interventions to those students demonstrating need • Supplemental support in addition tocore instruction • Small group • Frequent monitoring
Tier 3: A Closer Look • Intensive interventions • Longer term • Individualized program • More frequent monitoring
Problem Solving Model Define the Problem
Team-Based Approach • School based teams • Referral process • Data driven decision making, collaboration with teachers and parents, to design learning plans for students displaying need
RTI and Special Ed Eligibility RTI: • Criteria: Performance against peers, low rate of progress • Tests: Skill specific • Comparison: District, school, classroom standards
RTI and SE Eligibility RTI: • Tests: Continuous, over time • Assessment Targets: Very specific skills, what a child can/cannot do – skills and performances • GE Curriculum: Direct relationship
RTI and SE Eligibility RTI: • Eligibility Assessments and Intervention Relationship: Direct link • Info from Parents and Teachers:Typically central Source: NASDSE
Superintendent Asst. Superintendent Principals Teachers Child Study Team (CST) Members Guidance Directors: Special Services & Testing Step 2:Form District–Wide Committee
Step 3: Needs Assessment • Reviewed all current programs and materials • Schedules • Personnel • Data
Where to Start? • Originally: K-12 • Decision to implement K-5 – most applicable current programs are in these grades • Partially implement grade 6
To Do List • Detrack • Revise schedules • Plan tiered interventions • Personnel deployment
MARSD 4 Tier Model • Tier 4: CST referral • Tier 3: intensive one on one, individual practice • Tier 2: small group, push-in • Tier 1: infuse strategies into classroom practices
MARSD Tier 1 • Instructional Initiatives: – Schools Attuned – Balanced Literacy training – Math strategies training GOAL high quality, research supported programsand practices
MARSD Tier 2 • Push-in model GOAL in-class support within regular classroom setting through flexible grouping
MARSD Tier 3 • Literacy groups • Reading Recovery • Math Recovery • Supplemental instructional periods with materials (Options) GOAL provide intensive, supplemental support thatminimizes time out of classroom
Long Term Goals: Hopes and Aspirations • Increase student learning • Decrease long term cost of Special Education • Reduce number of at-risk students • Increase self-esteem and classroom successfor all children • Increase collaboration
Disclaimer • This is really (no, really) hard… – Second order change – Do things differently – See things differently – Be consistent, follow up
Hurdles • Finances • Additional resources, especially in higher grades • Co-teaching – has become much more acceptedand rewarding as the year goes along • Technology use • Differentiated Instruction
“To Do” Checklist • Communication – all stakeholders • Buy in – teachers, staff, parents • Make connections – how it all fits together • Take a piece at a time
Contact Information Thank you! Kimberly Honnick khonnick@gmail.com (973) 420-3722