240 likes | 470 Views
Effect of Reaction Conditions on the Formation and Thermal Behavior of Cellulose Nanocrystals. Ilari Filpponen, Xingwu Wang, Lucian A. Lucia Dimitris S. Argyropoulos. Organic Chemistry of Wood Components Laboratory Department of Forest Biomaterials Science & Engineering
E N D
Effect of Reaction Conditions on the Formation and Thermal Behavior of Cellulose Nanocrystals Ilari Filpponen, Xingwu Wang, Lucian A. Lucia Dimitris S. Argyropoulos Organic Chemistry of Wood Components Laboratory Department of Forest Biomaterials Science & Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina, USA 2007 International Conference on Nanotechnology For the Forest Products Industry 13 – 15 June 2007 ● Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
Outline • Brief Introduction/Background • Objectives • Production and Thermal Analysis of Cellulose Nanocrystals • Structural Analysis • Summary
From Bulk Cellulose to Cell-Nanocrystals • Cellulose is one of the most abundant natural biopolymers which upon acid hydrolysis yields highly crystalline rod-like rigid hydrophilic particles having nanoscale dimensions + Glucose Acid hydrolysis of cellulose to form cellulose nanocrystals Revol et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol.14, 170-172, 1992
Experimental-Overall Objectives • Optimization of the manufacturing process and utilization of thermal analysis for the characterization of cellulose nanocrystals • Understanding the size and uniformity of nanocrystals in relation to the manufacturing process
Preparation of Cellulose Nanocrystals • The cellulose pulp obtained from Whatman no.1 (98% α-cellulose, 80% crystallinity) filter paper was used as starting material • In this study hydrobromic acid was used in different concentrations (1.5M, 2.5M and 4.0M), respectively • The effect of reaction times, temperatures and applied external energy (ultrasonication during or after the hydrolysis) to the yields were investigated
Hydrolysis Reaction HBr (50ml) Solution Cellulose Pulp (1 gram) Acid Hydrolysis (oil bath, stirring) Centrifugation (1,500g) Ultrasonication Cellulose Suspension
Purification Steps Centrifug. Supernatant off 5 cycles contains cellulose nanocrystals pH 1-2 pH 4-5 Centrifugated Suspension Turbid Supernatant Centrifugation (15,000g) Collected Supernatant + + Freeze drying Remaining Sediment Cellulose Nanocrystals
100 100 80 80 60 60 Yield (%) Yield (%) 40 40 20 20 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (hr) Time (hr) The Effect of Reaction Time and Temperature (2.5M HBr) Ultrasonication During the Reaction Ultrasonication After the Reaction 100°C 100°C 80°C 80°C Yields increases along the reaction time in all conditions applied.
100 80 60 Yield (%) 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (hr) The Effect of Ultrasonication (2.5M HBr) Reaction at 80ºC Reaction at 100ºC 100 SC During SC During 80 60 Yield (%) 40 SC After 20 SC After 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (hr) At 80ºC ultrasonication, when applied during, increased yields but at 100ºC the effect was not significant (SC = Ultrasonication).
80 70 2.5 M 4.0 M 60 50 1.5 M Yields (%) 40 30 20 10 0 2hr, 100ºC SC 2hr, 100ºC SC 4hr, 100ºC SC 4hr, 100ºC SC During After During After Hydrolysis Conditions Yields with Different HBr Concentrations The yields were seen to increase significantly when acid concentration was Increased from 1.5M to 2.5M. With 4.0 M HBr unwanted reactions were observed.
100.00 80.00 60.00 Yield (%) 40.00 20.00 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (hr) Optimized HBr Hydrolysis Conditions (2.5M) Reaction at 100ºC Optimal Conditions 68% SC During SC After Typical yields from hydrolysis with either HCl or H2SO4 are around 40-45%
Thermal Analysis Hypothesis: Thermal analysis may provide a convenient and rapid tool for the determination and correlation of various physicochemical properties of cellulose nanocrystals (crystallinity, crystal dimensions)
Thermal Analysis Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA):Information provided:Thermal degradation, total amount of water (%). Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): Information provided:endothermic water evaporation peak (J/g), apparent maximum at around 120-130ºC Samples were kept in constant humidity (69%) before analysis and measurements were duplicated
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Loss of absorbed water Cellulose nanocrystals Sediment Starting Cellulose Tg was observed for cellulose powder and unreacted cellulose but not for cellulose nanocrystals
Cellulose Crystallinity and ΔHvap of H2O • Bertran et al. studied the correlation between the cellulose crystallinity and enthalpy of evaporation of absorbed water by using DSC • Higher crystallinity decreased the energy needed for water removal. Results were in good agreement with X-ray diffraction measurements 6 5 O (kJ/g) 4 2 3 2 Heat of Evaporation H 1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Crystallinity Index (%) Bertran et al. J. Appl. Pol. Sci., 32,4241-53, 1986
8 5 4.5 7 4 6 3.5 5 3 2.5 4 Heat of Evaporation H2O (kJ/g) Heat of Evaporation H2O (kJ/g) 2 3 1.5 2 1 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (hr) Time (hr) Cellulose Nanocrystals and ΔHvap of H2O 100°C SC during (2.5M HBr) Cellulose Nanocrystals Cellulose Sediment The crystallinity of dispersed nanoparticles seem to increase during the hydrolysis. Measurements showed good reproducibility.
X-ray Diffraction of Cell-Nanocrystals • Crystallinities were calculated according to Segal et al. Cr.I. (%) = ((I002 –Iam) / I002) x 100 where I002 is the maximum intensity from (002) plane at 2θ = 22.8° and Iam is the intensity of the background scatter measured at 2θ = 18° • The average crystallite size, in nm, was determined by the Debye-Scherrer formula: D = k λCu/β cosθ here k = 0.9, λCu = 0.154056 nm, β = FWHM (full width at half maximum, or half-width) in radians, θ = the position of the maximum of diffraction.
X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) 80% crystallinity (Cr.I.) 91% crystallinity (Cr.I.) Count rate (cps) x103 Count rate (cps) x103 2θ angle 2θ angle Starting Cellulose Cellulose Nanocrystals Acid hydrolysis increased the crystallinity of cellulose particles
Transmission Electron Microscopy • The length distribution of • cellulose nanocrystals were • estimated from TEM images. • Aggregation of cellulose • whiskers hindered the • determination of transverse dimensions 200 nm XRD 3hr, 100ºC, HBr (2.5M) SC during
Sample Cr.I. Transverse 1 (nm) Transverse 2 (nm) Length (nm) 100°C, SC during, 1hr 88 7.0 7.6 100-400 100°C, SC during, 2hr 89 7.6 7.7 100-400 100°C, SC during, 3hr 91 8.6 7.7 100-400 100°C, SC during, 3hr (sediment) 91 8.2 8.3 n.d. Average sizes of Cellulose Nanocrystals Transverse dimensions are based on XRD analysis. Lengths were estimated from TEM images. Cr.I. = Crystallinity Index
Summary • Reaction conditions play a significant role in determining the yield of cellulose nanocrystals • Ultrasonication during the hydrolysis reaction improved the yields of cellulose nanocrystals and allowed lower reaction temperatures • Thermal analysis is seen to provide information that currently is attempted to be correlated with various physicochemical properties of the cellulose nanocrystals (work in progress)