1 / 16

Nonregularity Proofs

Nonregularity Proofs. Regular Languages: Grand Unification. (Parallel Simulation) (Rabin and Scott’s work). (Collapsing graphs; Structural Induction) (S. Kleene’s work). (Construction) (Solving linear equations). Role of various representations for Regular Languages.

borna
Download Presentation

Nonregularity Proofs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nonregularity Proofs L10PLemma

  2. Regular Languages: Grand Unification (Parallel Simulation) (Rabin and Scott’s work) (Collapsing graphs; Structural Induction) (S. Kleene’s work) (Construction) (Solving linear equations) L10PLemma

  3. Role of various representations for Regular Languages • Closure under complementation. (DFAs) • Closure under union, concatenation, and Kleene star. (NFA-ls, Regular expression.) • Consequence: Closure under intersection by De Morgan’s Laws. • Relationship to context-free languages. (Regular Grammars.) • Ease of specification. (Regular expression.) • Building tokenizers/lexical analyzers. (DFAs) L10PLemma

  4. Consider pairs of strings: IfL were regular,then there exists a DFA M accepting L with the following property: L10PLemma

  5. CLAIM: JUSTIFICATION: Otherwise, from the definition of DFA, which contradicts the earlier conclusion. In order to satisfy the machine M must have a unique state for every i. Thus, M must have infinite number of states, if L is regular. This violates the definition of DFA. So, L must be non-regular. L10PLemma

  6. Using Closure Properties • Regular languages are closed under set-intersection. • Note that regularity is a property of a collection, and not a property of an individual string in the collection. L1=bit strings with even parity L2=bit strings with number of 1’s divisible by 3 L=bit strings with number of 1’s a multiple of 6 L10PLemma

  7. If R is a regular language and C is context-free, then may not be regular. • Proof: • Show that • is not regular. • Proof: If L were regular, ought to be regular. However, is known to be non-regular. Hence, L cannot be regular. L10PLemma

  8. DIGRESSION • If R is a regular language and C is context-free, then can be regular. • Proof: • L = {/\, ab, ba, aabb, abab, abba, baba, bbaa, …} • a*b* = {/\, a, b, aa, ab, bb,…, aabb,…} • C = {/\, ab, aabb, …} • intersect(a*b*, C) =intersect(L, a*b*) = C • union(a*b*, C) = a*b* ; union(L, C) = L L10PLemma

  9. Prelude to Pumping Lemma • Is 46551 divisible by 46? • Is 46554 divisible by 46? • Is 46552 divisible by 46? Necessary vs sufficient condition L10PLemma

  10. Pumping Lemma for Regular Languages • It is a necessary condition. • Every regular language satisfies it. • If a language violates it, it is not regular. • RL => PL not PL => not RL • It is not a sufficient condition. • Not every non-regular language violates it. • not RL =>? PL or not PL (no conclusion) L10PLemma

  11. Basic Idea: b a q0 a q1 b b a q2 q3 a,b L10PLemma

  12. Note, So, L10PLemma

  13. Fundamental Observation • Given a “sufficiently” long string, the states of a DFA must repeat in an accepting computation. These cycles can then be used to predict (generate) infinitely many other strings in (of) the language. Pigeon-Hole Principle L10PLemma

  14. Pumping Lemma (Theorem 7.3.3) • Let L be a regular language that is accepted by a DFA M with k states. Let z be any string in L with . Then z can be decomposed as uvw with L10PLemma

  15. For all sufficiently long strings (z) These exists non-null prefix (uv) and substring (v) For all repetitions of the substring (v), we get strings in the language. L10PLemma

  16. Proving non-regularity • If there exists an arbitrarily long string s L, and for each decomposition s = uvw, there exists an i such that , then L is non-regular. Negation of the necessary condition: L10PLemma

More Related