1 / 31

Computer Science and Christianity: A Modeling Approach

Computer Science and Christianity: A Modeling Approach. Gene B. Chase 29 March 2001. “Thank you for not using 666 in your papers”. Three Approaches to Integration. Incarnational Approach: Who am I? Incompleteness Approach: What do I not know? Imago Dei: What do I know?.

bottom
Download Presentation

Computer Science and Christianity: A Modeling Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computer Science andChristianity:A Modeling Approach Gene B. Chase 29 March 2001

  2. “Thank you for not using 666 in your papers”

  3. Three Approaches to Integration • Incarnational Approach: Who am I? • Incompleteness Approach: What do I not know? • Imago Dei: What do I know? Modeling Approach

  4. I. Incarnational: Who am I? • Lynn Arthur Steen. “The Science of Patterns.” Science, 240, 29 April 1988, pp. 611-616. • “I am a scientist, and I am a Christian. The integration takes place in me, not in the subject matter.”

  5. Apply this to Computer Science? • In the CS workplace, I will model virtue. • In worship I will praise God for the beauty that I see in CS.

  6. Lutheran View • St. Olaf College • Dr. Richard Hughes, President of California Lutheran University: “The Lutheran vision never seeks to superimpose the kingdom of God onto the world . . . Lutherans seek to bring the world and the kingdom of God into dialogue.”

  7. Lutheran View • At Lutheran Valparaiso University one department chair said: “Show us what Lutheran economics is and we'll see if we can find a Lutheran economist who can teach it.”

  8. Advantage & Disadvantage • Advantage: It addresses the “so what” question. • Disadvantage: It doesn’t seem to be pursuing integration, just letting it happen.

  9. II. Incompleteness: What don’t we know? • Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem (1931): For any mathematical system S strong enough to do addition and multiplication of integers, the consistency of that system, Con(S), cannot be proven within the system.

  10. Gödel Numbering • g(x)=2, g(y)=3, g(()=5, g())=7, g(+)=11, g(*)=13, g(0)=17, g(1)=19, g(2)=23, ... • g(x*(y+21))= • 2g(x)3g(*)5g(()7g(y)11g(+)13g(2)17g(1) • g(statements)= • 2g(st1)3g(st2)5g(st3)7g(st4)11g(st5)3g(st6)

  11. Incompleteness Results • J. R. Lucas: Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem suggests that humanity is not the measure of its own meaning. • Chase: “Skolem’s Paradox and the Predestination/Free-Will Discussion” • Chase: “What Does a Computer Program Mean?”

  12. Incompleteness in CS • Alan Turing (1937). The Halting Problem: No computer program U can be written which receives as input a program P and its input I, and returns true if P halts on input I, but returns false if P loops infinitely on input I. • Kurt Gödel (1956). P=NP?

  13. Is P=NP? • P=solved in polynomial time. • NP=checked for correctness in polynomial time. • Optimists: P=NP, or maybe PNP. • Pessimists: P=NP can’t be known. • Ecc. 3:11: God “has also set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end.” • 4 - 10000 = 4

  14. Advantage & Disadvantage • Advantage: A sense of humility, awe, and mystery before a great God. • Disadvantage: This view has a “god of the gaps” feel to it.

  15. Calvinist View • Creation mandate: To “subdue the earth” (Gen. 1:28) • The Fall affected our ability to reason, not just our ability to be moral.

  16. III. Imago Dei:What do we know? • Parables. • Donald MacKay. The Clockwork Image, IV Press 1974. A marquee of flashing lights: • Physics explanation. • Information-processing explanation.

  17. III. Imago Dei:What do we know?

  18. Complementarity • Information-processing complements Physics • Waves complement particles • “Complementarity as a Christian Philosophy of Mathematics”

  19. Deciding on a Career

  20. Roger Penrose Mathematics Physics Mind

  21. Big Ideas of CS • Abstraction • Hierarchy • Virtuality • Global versus local • Parallelism • Time/space tradeoff • ...

  22. Sofware Soul Analogies in CS Don’t confuse the map with the territory.

  23. Parables as Analogies General General Deductive Inductive Specific Specific Transductive

  24. Father / Mother Friend Husband Master / Employer Judge Shepherd Vineyard Owner Social RelationshipsAbout God in Jesus’ Parables

  25. C. S. Lewis • The metaphor is backwards: It is not God who is like our earthly fathers; it is our earthly fathers who should strive to be like Father. • Similarly, CS is not the reality and our faith the metaphor; our relationship with God is the reality and CS can only provide metaphors.

  26. Advantage & Disadvantage • Advantage: We are at home in the universe. • Disadvantage: Multiple perspectives can too easily lead to relativism.

  27. Anabaptist View • Love more important than doctrine (John 13:36) • “We see a poor relfection in a mirror” (I Cor. 13:12)

  28. Anglican View religious Revelation Tradition objective subjective Reason Experience (Experiment) scientific

  29. Bibliography of Faith-Learning Articles • and Books by Dr. Chase • Arranged in Reverse-Chronological Order • [1] Faith-Discipline Musings http://www.messiah.edu/acdept/depthome/mathsci/courses/sensem/manifesto.htm . • Web posting of March 15 about Intellectual Property.

More Related