1 / 9

Agricultural policy objectives Multifunctionality: a new rationale for support?

Explore the concept of multifunctionality in agricultural policy objectives and its role in justifying support for farming. Discuss the various non-commodity outputs provided by farming, such as cultural heritage, rural development, landscape, biodiversity, and food security. Consider the jointness of these outputs and the implications for policy. Evaluate the existence of externalities and public goods in relation to multifunctionality. Examine the challenges in valuing and measuring non-commodity outputs. Discuss policy implications, including the need for improved targeting and decoupling of policy measures.

bow
Download Presentation

Agricultural policy objectives Multifunctionality: a new rationale for support?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agricultural policy objectivesMultifunctionality: a new rationale for support? Economics of Food Markets Lecture 5 Alan Matthews

  2. Reading • Evolution of agricultural policy objectives • Winters, A., (1990), The so-called non-economic objectives of agricultural support, OECD Economic Studies 13, pp. 237-266. • Multifunctionality • Cahill, C. and Shobayashi, M., 2000. 'The concept of multifunctionality of agriculture: results of OECD research', Proceedings of the Agricultural Economics Society of Ireland. • Bohman, M. et al. 1999. The Use and Abuse of Multifunctionality, US Department of Agriculture Economic Resarch Service. • See also the Commission's defence of multifunctionality in the context of the WTO agricultural negotiations. • Read the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Multifunctionality: A Pretext for Protection, ABARE Current Issues paper 99.3, Canberra, ABARE, for a critical view.

  3. The European model of farming • Emphasises the non-commodity outputs provided by farming activity • Cultural heritage • Rural development • Landscape • Biodiversity and environment • Food security • Does provision of these non-commodity outputs provide a distinct justification for support to farming? • Is underpinned by the idea of multifunctionality

  4. Context • Discourse emerged in the late 1990s • Partly to provide a new legitimation of public payments to farmers as the compensation justification became less convincing • To defend some types of support to agriculture in WTO negotiations aiming to continue the agricultural policy reform process • Endorsed by the European Council in December 1997 which approved the Agenda 2000 strategy • “The Union is determined to continue developing the present European model of agriculture while seeking greater internal and external competitiveness”

  5. Multifunctionality • The existence of multiple commodity and non-commodity outputs that are jointly produced, AND • The fact that some of these non-commodity outputs exhibit characteristics of externalities or public goods • Why multifunctionality matters: • High protection countries argue that maintaining agricultural production is a necessary prerequisite for these non-commodity benefits

  6. The issue of jointness • Think about jointness wrt cultural heritage, rural viability via agricultural employment, landscape, environmental quality, food security • Can these non-commodity outputs be provided by the non-agricultural sector? • Are there economies of scope such that agriculture has a competitive advantage in supplying these outputs? • Does jointness imply fixed proportions? • Could there be non-agricultural provision?

  7. The issue of externalities/public goods • Non-commodity outputs that constitute positive externalities do not necessarily cause market failure • The existence of a positive externality is not necessarily an argument for intervention; how much of the non-commodity output is optimal? • The problem of valuation • Not all public goods necessarily imply government provision, e.g. possibility of clubs, voluntary groups • The spatial and scale dimensions of non-commodity outputs

  8. Policy implications • Agriculture produces negative as well as positive spillovers, yet advocates of multifunctionality do not net out or consider these negative effects • Using agricultural support in one country to attain multifunctional benefits lower the benefits from agriculture, including multifunctional benefits, everywhere else • Unlikely that blanket measures to encourage agricultural production will ensure just the right outputs of non-commodity benefits in the right places at reasonable cost • Provides an argument for improving targeting and decoupling of policy measures

  9. Policy implications • Many non-commodity outputs, especially those relating to land use, may be linked to a certain amount of commodity production but not directly to the level of production (threshold effects) or may be linked to a particular technology of production (choice of inputs) rather than level of output • E.g. dykes for rice production may help to prevent flooding but this effect is independent of the intensity of rice production • Measurement of the demand for the non-commodity output, however difficulty, is critical in determining whether a market failure exists

More Related