390 likes | 580 Views
Transnational Academic Mobility, Internationalisation, and Interculturality in Higher Education. Terri Kim Brunel University London, U.K. European Migration Network V National Seminar: Immigration of International Students 19 October 2012 Eurooppasali , Malminkatu 16, Helsinki. Outline.
E N D
Transnational Academic Mobility, Internationalisation, and Interculturalityin Higher Education Terri Kim Brunel University London, U.K. European Migration Network V National Seminar: Immigration of International Students 19 October 2012 Eurooppasali, Malminkatu 16, Helsinki
Outline • Trans-national mobility of international students and academics – a growing phenomenon worldwide • Internationalisation as marketisation • Multi-cultural insularity in UK HE • Academic mobility for new knowledge creation • Some suggestion for global learning and interculturality in HE
Immigration in Europe in the Age of Migration Total Population in Europe: 730 million 9.5% from overseas Spain: 40 million (14.1%) Germany: 80 million (13.1%) France: 64 million (10.7%) U.K.: 60 million (10.4%) Italy: 60 million (7.4%) Source: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2010
Internationalisation of Higher Education Worldwide through Academic Mobility • Total number foreign students worldwide: + 3.5 million Inbound • 1.5 million of all foreign students study in Europe (50% global “market share”) • 58% of these come from outside Europe, 38% from inside (4% unknown) • Foreign student share (of total enrolment) is about 7% in Europe. (Source: Bernd Wächter, ACA, 2010; UKCISA, 2011)
There are two major processes occurring: • very rapid changes in political space, particularly the creation of regional spaces, within which transnational academic mobility occurs; • and – almost everywhere – policies are being written and implemented by international and supranational agencies. Previous sporadic, exceptional and limited inter-national academic links have become systematic, dense, and multiple trans-national, which is especially visible in Europe.
On a global scale, • We are experiencing a mass movement of academics (especially researchers) across borders at the same time as a new mode of knowledge production (Gibbon, 2003; Kim, forthcoming, 2013) and the corporatisation of universities (Kim, 2008). • HE has become indicator of economic super-power; and universities are regarded as ‘ideal talent-catching machines’ International students become migrant workers.
Proportion of migrants with degrees on the rise in the OECD area • More than half of recent migrants in Canada, Australia, Ireland and the UK are higher education graduates. (Harnessing the Skills of Migrants and Diasporas to Foster Development, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, France, 2012, University World News, 7 Oct. 2012). • In absolute numbers, some 1.7 million highly educated migrants within the OECD area are from India, 1.3 million from the UK, 1.3 million from the Philippines, 1.2 million from China and one million from Germany. These five largest highly educated migrant populations account for around 26% of all tertiary educated migrants in the OECD area. (OECD, Connecting with Emigrants: A global profile of diasporas, 2012) • Pattern of migration brain drain, and increasingly brain circulation
“… mobility shall be the hallmark of the European Higher Education Area. We call upon each country to increase mobility, to ensure its high quality and to diversify its types and scope. In 2020, at least 20% of those graduating in the European Higher Education Area should have had a study or training period abroad.” Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education in Leuven, 28-29 April 2009, ‘The Bologna Process 2020’ (p. 4)
… mobility-related disadvantages should be eliminated for all workers. This is particularly important for the research world as it allows more mobility, more cooperation and more competition throughout Europe. As such, it could lay the very foundations of a truly dynamic European Research Area. The League of European Research Universities , 1 March 2010
EC’s recent proposal: ERASMUS for All • Allocate €19 billion (2014- 2020) – 70% increase compared to the current seven-year budget. • Main aim: (i) Modernisation of education and training systems; (ii) providing citizens with skills and competences, and ultimately improving their ‘employability’; (iii) increasing student and staff mobility to and from countries outside the EU as well. • Global learning opportunities for individuals - 5 million mobility opportunities, including 2.2 million HE students. • Specific Knowledge Alliances between HEIs and businesses, promoting innovation and fostering creativity and entrepreneurship.
Record numbers of international students – an annual increase of 12% (2010-11); rising by more than 75% since 2000 Source: UNESCO; BBC 10 March 2011
International students in UK HE • totalled 428,225 in 2011 compared with 405,810 in 2010 (Total 17% of student population; an increase of 6%) • made up 14% of full-time first degree students • made up 70% of full-time taught postgraduates • made up 48% of full-time research degree students • Top non-EU sending countries: China, India, Nigeria, USA, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Thailand, Canada Source: UKCISA (http://www.ukcisa.org.uk/about/statistics_he.php)
International students in UK HE • Top EU-sending countries: Republic of Ireland, Germany, France, Greece, Cyprus, Poland, Italy, Spain, Romania, Bulgaria • Popular subject areas by the number of international students: Business and Administration studies; Engineering and Technology; Social studies; Computer science; subjects allied to Medicine; Languages; Creative arts and design; Law; Biological sciences; Physical sciences; Education; Architecture, building & planning; Medicine & Dentistry; Mass communication & documentation; Historical & philosophical studies; Mathematical sciences; Combined; Agriculture & related subjects; Veterinary subjects. • Top 20 largest recruiters of international students (2010-11): University of Manchester (26%); UCL (38%); Nottingham; University of Warwick; Edinburgh; Sheffield; University of the Arts, London; Oxford (27%); Birmingham; Coventry; LSE (66%); Greenwich; Bedfordshire; King’s College, London; Cambridge (30%); Middlesex; London Met (26%); Imperial College (40%); The City University; University of Westminster • Students studying wholly overseas for a UK HE qualification: 408, 685 Source: UKCISA (http://www.ukcisa.org.uk/about/statistics_he.php
Enrolments of international (non-EU)domiciled students, 2008/09Enrolments of international (non-EU)domiciled students, 2008/09 Source: NIACE; Professor Sir David Watson, Oxford, 12 March 2011
UK • According to the national government’s reports: “higher education institutions operate in an international labour market, they will take appropriate measures to ease the mobility of academic staff, and the large numbers of international staff reflect the UK's openness towards mobility.” (National Reports 2004-2005 of England, Northern Ireland and Wales prepared for the Bologna Process, p. 9)
Internationalisation of the Academic Profession in British Universities • 27% of full-time academic staff appointed in 2007/08 came from outside the UK (Kim and Locke, 2009). • 41% of UK university full professors have foreign citizenship (Teichler, 2010). • Within the UK, the highest numbers of new appointments from the EU are: Germany 4200, Ireland 2895, Italy 2695, France 2340, Greece 1905, and Spain 1570. • From outside the EU, the highest numbers of appointees are US 2950 (2380 academic staff + 570 researchers), China 3730 (2280 academic staff + 1450 researchers), and India 1900 (1330 + 570). • On the basis of current trends, it has been estimated by the Universities UK that the overall proportion of international academics employed in British universities will rise to 50% in 20 years (Source: Universities UK, Policy Brief Talent Wars, 2007, p. 10). • The rise of a new transnational academic tribe & the de-nationalisation of the British academic profession? (Kim, 2009)
UK Government new immigration policy • It is aimed at reducing net annual immigration from 240,000 to 100,000 by 2015. • The government rejected calls from 70 of Britain's universities to stop counting foreign students as immigrants this year (BBC News, 30 May 2012). • It restricts who can stay in the UK upon completion of their studies - new rules required foreign students to earn at least £20,000 per year to be employed by Home Office approved companies. • Under new visa regulations, students face tougher questions about their destination, limits on their ability to work and harder questions on their English-language capability.
Expansion, Control and Finance of UK Higher Education • Massification of HE started relatively late but has been rapid in the UK for the last twenty years. -> A former UK government set a target to increase participation in Higher Education towards 50% of those domiciled in England and aged 18 to 30 by 2010. • As a consequence of Widening Participation in HE policy, there is visible disparity in the home student cohort – in terms of age, social class and ethnicity with 17% BME nationally.
The major policy driver: Human Resource Development for the UK Economic competitiveness - UK Economic position, Economic performance in the global knowledge economy “Widening access and improving participation in HE are a crucial part of our mission. Participation in HE will equip our citizens to operate productively within the global knowledge economy. It also offers social benefits, including better health, lower crime and a more tolerant and inclusive society.” HEFCE Strategic Plan 2003-2008
Percentage of UK-domiciled first yearstudents from minority ethnic groups, 2008/09 Source: NIACE; Professor Sir David Watson, Oxford, 12 March 2011
Percentage of young full-time first degree entrants fromnational statistics socio-economic classification classes4, 5, 6 and 7, 2008/09 Source: NIACE; Professor Sir David Watson, Oxford, 12 March 2011
A Widening gap in Widening participation in UK HE? As Crozier and Reay pointed out, what seems to have emerged in the process of widening participation in higher education in Britain is a polarised mass system of HE (Reay, Ball, and David 2005). “Widening participation will be the first victim of funding cuts”(The Guardian, 2 March 2010) + the new triple tuition fee regime
Internationalisation as marketisation and Widening Participation in HE as “social engineering” for neoliberal knowledge economy • Multi-cultural insularity(?) in British HE - The coexistence of two cultures on campus entailed by multi-monoculturalism
Complex relations of • transnational academic mobility, • internationalisation, and • interculturalityin Higher Education Underpinning meanings and forces that shape the Triadic Relations + WP (2) (1) (3)
“Universities have become once again universitas informed by the universals of a (new) lingua franca and by the mobility of academics and ideas which are clustering into a few centres of excellence within competition on a global scale” (Kim, 2009: 402). • As argued by Ainley (1993),’skills’ formerly understood by many as complex social processes have become de-contextualised and de-constructed into finite, isolable ‘competences’ to be located as the property of the individual, who then carry them, luggage-like, from job to job and also across spatial boundaries (Ainley 1993: 357). The same logic is applied to transnational mobile students and migrant workers and the types of knowledge they carry.
The concept of boundaries is partly drawn from work on collective identities - as explored by Barth (1969) and Jenkins (1996). “Boundaries are permeable, persisting despite the flow of personnel across them, and identity is constructed in transactions which occur at and across the boundary.” (Jenkins, 1996, p. 24)
Transnational Academic MobilityMaking Boundaries (i) --- >> Transnational Academic Mobility --- >> Hard Soft ____________________________ Explicit Implicit
Transnational Academic Mobility Making Boundaries (ii) Visible Invisible _____________________________ Legal-rationalCultural- Reflexive State Personal Authority Adaptation
Academic Mobility as an ontological condition and Knowledge as ‘capital’ • Urry (2000; 2002) rightly asserts that mobility is an ontological condition and is expressed in processes of people, commodities, cultures and technologies all on the move. • An important way to see these processes and relations of mobility and knowledge creation is through different types of knowledge as ‘capital’.
A Typology of knowledge creation: evolving from Mode 1 and Mode 2 to Mode 3 Mode 1 Mode 2 -----> Mode 3 Based on Incorporating Using Knowledge CapitalSocial CapitalIdentity Capital (hierarchical) (interactive, multiple nodes) (entwined, circular movement)
Identity capital as a concept is not context-specific or class-specific. Identity capital includes cultural capital as well as many other elements that are specific to membership in any type of social culture. Identity capital operates to gain a group membership validation or preserve a self-definition (Cote & Levine, 2008) • Moreover, I argued that transnational identity capital involves generic competences to engage with otherness(Kim, 2010).
Mode 3 as embodied, travelled Knowledge • I would argue that particular types of tacit knowledge formed and carried by transnational mobile academics and students are new form of ‘embodied travelled knowledge’ which can potentially develop into enculturedknowledge’ – as defined by Collins (1993) - and subsequently form ‘transnational identity capital’ (Kim, forthcoming). • Embodied knowledge consists of contextual practices, and is more of a social acquisition, as how individuals interact in and interpret their environment creates this non-explicit type of knowledge. • Enculturedknowledge is the process of achieving shared understandings through socialisation and acculturation (Collins, 1993).
The existing theories and collected evidence have not engaged sufficiently with ‘The University’ as an aggregation of mobile individuals. • This specific context promotes new types of knowledgetransfer and transformation (Kim, 2010 - novel processes that are occurring along with academic mobility. • These differ from codified knowledge explicitly required in the contemporary entrepreneurial university. • They occur in the interface between the mobile individual and ‘The University’ – better understanding of maybe key to success of the ‘internationalisation’ agenda. • They need to be investigated via different instruments.
Using biographical accounts of mobile academic intellectuals, my research has focused on how academic mobility led to a new mode of knowledge creation in the process of becoming strangers and being positioned as academic migrants.
Transnational Academic Mobility and new Knowledge Creation for Interculturality in HE In the contemporary neoliberal market period (1990-2011) Talents + M1, M2, M3 • Global Talent Recruitment, Rise and Expansion of Transnational Research Policy and Research Industry • Further diversification of Mode 2 knowledge production and • Rise of Mode 3 knowledge, significant but in danger of commodification
Martha Nussbaum on Cosmopolitan Citizenship ‘Each of us dwells… in two communities - the local community of our birth and in the community of human argument and aspiration… in which we look neither to this corner nor to that, but measure the boundaries of our nation by the sun’. Nussbaum (1994) Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism, Boston Review 19 (Oct/Nov).
Rethinking Interculturality in Higher Education Functionary, instrumental Existential Embodied, encultured knowledge -> Reflexive continuum A journey to develop, acquire transnational identity capital (Kim, 2010) Existential migration (Greg Madison, 2006); Narrative imagination (Nussbaum, 1997) • Intercultural competence skills formation -> Finite, isolable competences • Training; expected to be acquired through codified knowledge-based courses, degree-programmes, certificates
For further discussion and future contact: Terri.Kim@brunel.ac.ukTerri.c.kim@gmail.com