1 / 31

Oklahoma Perspective on Spending Limitations Jonathan Small, CPA Fiscal Policy Director

Oklahoma Perspective on Spending Limitations Jonathan Small, CPA Fiscal Policy Director Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, Inc. Jonathan Small, CPA. Certified Public Accountant Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting Budget Analyst – Office of State Finance

boyce
Download Presentation

Oklahoma Perspective on Spending Limitations Jonathan Small, CPA Fiscal Policy Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Oklahoma Perspective on Spending Limitations Jonathan Small, CPA Fiscal Policy Director Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, Inc. www.ocpathink.org

  2. Jonathan Small, CPA • Certified Public Accountant • Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting • Budget Analyst – Office of State Finance • Fiscal/Research Analyst – House of Reps • Auditor – BKD, LLP • Dir. of Government Affairs – Insurance Dep. www.ocpathink.org

  3. Mission “OCPA's mission is to accumulate, evaluate, and disseminate public policy ideas and information for Oklahoma consistent with the principles of free enterprise, limited government, and individual initiative.” www.ocpathink.org

  4. Sources • Pages 152 – 154 of the Oklahoma Comprehensive Accounting Financial Report • United States Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis • Oklahoma House of Representatives Legislative Appropriations publications www.ocpathink.org

  5. General state legislative spending limits • General & special appropriation bill limits • Balanced budget requirements • Limit on appropriations authority of 95% • Limit on appropriations growth of 12% • Requirement to save surplus • Limits on “Rainy Day Fund” spending www.ocpathink.org

  6. Limit on appropriations growth • Article 10, Section 23 of the Oklahoma Constitution • Limit on total appropriated from all funds in the preceding fiscal year • Total appropriated cannot exceed growth of 12% plus inflation www.ocpathink.org

  7. Why a limit on appropriations growth? • Economic volatility in 1970’s & 1980’s • Passed by 1985 Legislature • Added by HJR 1005, SQ 587 • Election held April 30, 1985 • Yes – 405,775, No – 203,369 www.ocpathink.org

  8. What’s happened since creation of the limit on appropriations growth? www.ocpathink.org

  9. State appropriations continue to grow • FY-1993 – $3.65 Billion • FY-2012 – $6.50 Billion • Inflation adjusted growth of $640 Million • Appropriations have been less than the prior year in only 5 of last 20 years www.ocpathink.org

  10. www.ocpathink.org

  11. www.ocpathink.org

  12. Total state government expenditures continue to grow • FY-2001 – $9.64 Billion • FY-2010 – $16.6 Billion • Inflation adjusted growth of $4.7 Billion • Total state spending has grown every year since FY-2001 www.ocpathink.org

  13. www.ocpathink.org

  14. Total state government expenditures outpacing private earnings • Private Earnings 2001 – 2010, growth of 40.71% • Govt. Expend. 2001 – 2010, growth of 72.20% www.ocpathink.org

  15. www.ocpathink.org

  16. Total state government earnings outpacing private earnings • Private Earnings 2001 – 2010, growth of 40.71% • State Govt. Earnings 2001 – 2010, growth of 59.60% www.ocpathink.org

  17. www.ocpathink.org

  18. www.ocpathink.org

  19. www.ocpathink.org

  20. Is the current limit working? www.ocpathink.org

  21. Preceding decline periods, rapid increases • Appropriations in FY-1996, $3.7 Billion • Appropriations in FY-2002, $5.6 Billion • Appropriations growth of $1.9 Billion or 48.76%, in just six years • Private earnings growth over same period 50.71% www.ocpathink.org

  22. Preceding decline periods, rapid increases • Appropriations in FY-2004, $5.1 Billion • Appropriations in FY-2010, $7.2 Billion • Appropriations growth of $2.1 Billion or 41.29%, in just six years • Private earnings growth over same period 36.24% www.ocpathink.org

  23. Preceding each decline, rapid increases • Private employment in 2000, 1,572,190 • Private employment in 2010, 1,667,644 • Private employment growth from 2000 – 2010, 6.07% www.ocpathink.org

  24. Preceding each decline, rapid increases • State employment in 2000, 79,805 • State employment in 2010, 86,641 • State employment growth from 2000 – 2010, 8.57% www.ocpathink.org

  25. www.ocpathink.org

  26. The challenge • State government appropriations and spending growth exceeding private earnings growth • State government employment growth exceeding private employment growth • Rapid increases in growth years, resulting in abrupt decreases www.ocpathink.org

  27. How have we solved other spending challenges? www.ocpathink.org

  28. 2010 SJR 51, State Question 757 • Former limit on “Rainy Day Fund” of 10% of prior year general revenue certification • During downturns and emergencies, this proved inadequate • Lawmakers and citizens saw the need to save more www.ocpathink.org

  29. 2010 SJR 51, State Question 757 • Lawmakers pass SJR 51 • Sent to a vote of the people a constitutional amendment increasing limit on the size of the “Rainy Day Fund” • Increase to 15% approved by voters in November 2010 www.ocpathink.org

  30. Solution Given government growth rates exceeding private sector growth rates, and periods of rapid unsustainable growth in state appropriations, it is reasonable and time to amend the current state constitutional limit on appropriation growth. www.ocpathink.org

  31. Thank You! Q & A Jonathan Small, CPA jonathan@ocpathink.org (405) 602-1667 www.ocpathink.org

More Related