40 likes | 108 Views
This research delves into the profound question of who is accountable for the perpetuation of sex-selective abortion in India. Highlighting how the government's reluctance to enforce laws against this practice perpetuates discrimination and societal views favoring male superiority and female inferiority, the study examines the efficacy of legislative measures in curbing this issue. The analysis explores the impact of Indian socio-cultural values on sex-selective abortions and the government's enforcement of existing laws, revealing a troubling dynamic influenced by corruption and societal pressures. Ultimately, the study sheds light on the shared responsibility among the government, socio-cultural norms, and population control strategies in tackling this pressing issue.
E N D
Introduction • Research question: Who is responsible for the continuation for sex-selective abortion? • Thesis: The government is influenced by the sociocultural views of Indian society, by not enforcing laws against sex-selective abortion they are not only condoning sex-selective abortion practice, but discrimination as well.
Body paragraph #3 • Topic sentence: Indian Socio-cultural values influence sex-selective abortions. • Male= superior • Women= inferior • Negative connotation • Will banning abortion solve the issue?
Body Paragraph 4 • Topic sentence: The government is establishing laws to ban sex-selective abortion, but they are not enforcing their laws. • 1994 ban of sex determination test • Continuation of sex determination test
Conclusion • The government’s decisions are corrupted by the socio-cultural values; allowing the continuation of sex-selective abortion. • Who is to blame • Government • Socio-cultural values • Population control