80 likes | 214 Views
Service Orchestration. June 8, 2004. Atul Saini CEO and CTO, Fiorano Software, Inc. Atul@fiorano.com www.fiorano.com. Services - a source of much confusion. Activities (used in most typical BPEL flows) Synchronous functions that accept an input and return an output
E N D
Service Orchestration June 8, 2004 Atul Saini CEO and CTO, Fiorano Software, Inc. Atul@fiorano.com www.fiorano.com
Services - a source of much confusion • Activities (used in most typical BPEL flows) • Synchronous functions that accept an input and return an output • Typically executed within a thread context • Coarse-Grained Services • Event-driven inputs and outputs (multiple, asynchronous) • Typically execute in a process-context • Service-Abstraction has dramatic impact on usability and benefits to end-users
Activity Orchestration Fundamental Problems • Focused on Control-flow • Most BPEL engines do not implement event/data flow visually; requires programming • Low-Level • Function-call interface implies “too many moving parts” • Single-process coordination • Control process is centralized • Typically uses request/reply interactions with external systems (inefficient)
Orchestration of Coarse-Grained Services • Focused on Event-Flow • Enables event-driven business processes without programming • High-Level • Maps to problems at a business-level • Allows the creation of a single-view for Business and IT • Accomodates BPEL control flow • Internal structure of service-abstraction is a BPEL process • Combination of event(data) and control flow
Orchestration of Coarse-Grained Services • Focused on Event-Flow • Enables event-driven business processes without programming • High-Level • Maps to problems at a business-level • Allows the creation of a single-view for Business and IT • Accomodates BPEL control flow • Internal structure of service-abstraction is a BPEL process • Combination of event(data) and control flow
Coarse-Grained Service Orchestration Benefits • Easy change-management, extensibility • Logical design maps directly to the physical implementation • Business Process model isthe implementation • Loosely-Coupled Service Composition • Dynamically setup and auto-reconfigured middleware • Event-Driven Business Processes Unified Business/Technical views lead to dramatic savings!
Summary • Impedance mismatch between Business and Technology users reduced • Faster turnaround times, dynamic adaptability • Enhanced Reuse of existing software and hardware • Event-Driven Business Process via composed services • Implementation Cycle-Times • 4-5 months to 4-5 weeks Coarse-Grained, Event-Driven Services offer key benefits