140 likes | 261 Views
A convenient untruth. Why CPI is stealing your pension. CPI - a huge issue. The Government has chosen to use CPI rather than RPI to increase all state pensions, state welfare payments and all pubic sector pensions Many private sector scheme will also choose to use CPI if they can
E N D
A convenient untruth Why CPI is stealing your pension
CPI - a huge issue • The Government has chosen to use CPI rather than RPI to increase all state pensions, state welfare payments and all pubic sector pensions • Many private sector scheme will also choose to use CPI if they can • It will affect the young even more than the old since the effect will continue relentlessly • Taken together this may affect 40% of the population very seriously
What’s the difference: CPI vs RPI • The Government says the main difference is CPI does not cover housing costs and Council Tax • They say it is thus more appropriate to pensioners • In fact that is NOT the main difference – there has been no rise in housing and Council tax in the last year yet the indexes are 1.2% different in Dec 2010. • Most of the difference is the way they are calculated – RPI uses arithmetic mean (AM) to average the price rises in the basket and CPI uses geometric mean (GM) • GM is always less for the same set of price rises – this is called “the formula effect” • The difference due to this formula effect has averaged about 0.75% over the last year.
Arithmetic Mean vs Geometric Mean • In arithmetic mean (AM) you add up the price changes in a month and divide by the number of items – it is what you would normall consider to be an average • In geometric mean (GM) you multiply the price changes together and take the nth root • GM is normally used where several change are accumulated e.g. a business grows by 2% year 1, 3% year 2 and 4% year 3. The average growth is not (2+3+4)/3 = 3 it is cube root (2X3X4) = 2.88 • But price rises across a month are not like this so GM is the wrong average to use
“Justification” for using GM • Statisticians say RPI overeggs inflation because it doesn’t take account of substitution • Substitution is the idea that people shift to cheaper goods and cheaper shops as prices rise • Example iceberg lettuce price stays the same and romaine price doubles. Consumers shift rorm romaine to iceberg • GM would apply (apparently) if the amount they now spend on each is equal • This argument is weak because • Iceberg not as good as romaine so quality not like for lik • Consumers unlikely to make the right calculations • Index basket is periodically adjusted which would include substitution so this is double counting • GM does not actually measure substitution at all – it is just being used as an estimate because it is just lower than AM • Basically the use of GM is a statistical fix
Why does index discrepancy vary • The Royal Statistical Society has estimate that the calculation method accounted for between 0.43% and 0.83% of the CPI/RPI difference last year i.e. most of it • The difference in the methods rises when the range in the individual price rises of items in the basket is greater. Some simple examples: • Item rises 2%, 3%, 4% AM=3 GM= 2.88 1%, 3%, 5% AM =3GM=2.47 1.5%,3%,4.5% AM=3 GM=2.73
Inconsistency • Although CPI will be used for pensioners and welfare payments it is not being used for many other things such as • The fuel accelerator tax • Index-linked gilts • The electricity feed-in tariff • The government therefore knows this is not a good measure of inflation but chooses conveniently to ignore it • All EU governments have CPI, originally designed as a comparison measure, but all the others use an RPI like measure for pension increases
CPI was never meant to be real index • CPI started life as an invention of the EU to enable comparison between EU economies • It was originally called the Harmonised Consumer Index of Prices (HCIP) • It excluded housing costs because these were often out of synch and excluded Council Tax because many other country lacked such a tax • Why Geometric Mean was chosen is not clear other than the questionable substitution theory • No other European country uses CPI to index pensions – they use RPI equivalents • This is clearly opportunistic thievery by the government
The Disastrous Cumulative effect • Over 10 years 7-10% of pension lost • Over 20 year 13- 20% of pension lost • Person now aged 20 – 30-40% lost by retirement • In the long term represents a huge reduction in pensions – the 20 year old will have an average salary pension so his pension will be 30% of current pensions • Future pensioner poverty • Burden on welfare - which will also be reduced • This is much bigger issue for the young than university tuition fees – it’s a double whammy for the young
Triple Lock • Government may argue triple lock on pensions – greater of CPI, wages, 2.5% • For the forseeable future wages will lag CPI (and certainly RPI) • There is no triple lock for pubic sector and private sector pensions affected – they will relentlessly fall behind inflation and wages
Just like the banks • Banks made money out of sub-prime mortgages by making the system so complicated it fooled people • If you make it complicated you can get away with murder – or at least theft • The Government is doing the same thing
The media • Have ignored this issue – probably because journalists cannot count • BBC in particular have accepted the governments ruse and now only refer to CPI “the government’s preferred measure” –rarely even mention RPI • Like sub-prime mortgages it is amazingly easy, with our media, to perpetrate such a fraud
Royal Statistical Society and UKSA • The RSS has written to UK Statistics Authority (ONS) to complain that CPI should include housing costs and Council Tax and that the calculation method is producing to great a discrepancy • Here is a good article on the topic http://www.straightstatistics.org/article/rpi-vs-cpi-seconds-out-round-two • Here is the RSS letterhttp://www.nfop.org.uk/docs/RSS%20re%20RPI%20CPI.pdf
CPI + • UK Statistics Authority working through Consumer Prices Advisory Committee (CPAC) to include housing costs and Council Tax • If they do this it will be embarrassing because will become obvious that the difference is the calculation method • It will be obvious that the government has been lying or ignorant – take your pick