1 / 13

Work by: Nathaniel Royal, Pamela Dalal , Kostas G. Goulias

The Evolution Of Travel In The Urban Landscape Extrapolating Spatio ‐Temporal Behavioral Trends With Longitudinal Data. Keywords: Behavioral Geography, Migration, Central Place Theory, GIS , Spatio -Temporal. Work by: Nathaniel Royal, Pamela Dalal , Kostas G. Goulias.

Download Presentation

Work by: Nathaniel Royal, Pamela Dalal , Kostas G. Goulias

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Evolution Of Travel In The Urban LandscapeExtrapolating Spatio‐Temporal Behavioral Trends With Longitudinal Data Keywords: Behavioral Geography, Migration, Central Place Theory, GIS , Spatio-Temporal Work by: Nathaniel Royal, Pamela Dalal, Kostas G. Goulias

  2. Study Background What are the spatio-temporal behavioral trends of persons in an environment? Over time, how do the human-environment interactions evolve in an urban setting? Trends in individual spatial behavior What changes about how you travel as you age? As you start a family? How does this aggregate? Trends in aggregate spatial interactions - How does the urban area change as it grows?

  3. Study region and data • Puget Sound • 3.7 million people in 6,290 sq miles (2010) • GDP: $22.9 billion (2009, BEA) • Largest city: Seattle, population 612,000, 142.5 sq miles (2010) • Greece • 11.3 million people in 50,944 sq miles (2010) • GDP: $311.3 billion (2011 estimate) • Largest city: Athens, population 3.1 million, 15 sq. mi

  4. Δ Spatial behavior = ΔActivity spaces • How does behavioral change over space and time • Change in spatial patterns though observed activity spaces • The environment in which an individual travels for activity participation • Δ Space: x y coordinates of home and destinations from activity diaries • Δ Time: Total travel distance North North HOME HOME 1996 1997

  5. Δ Spatial behavior = ΔActivity spaces • ΔTime = 11 mi Distance = 9 mi • Uniquedestinations per person between two time points Δ Space • Create vectors of directionality 1. Normalize x y coordinates • Home xy – Home xy (0,0) • Destination xy – Home xy (dx,dy) 2. Calculate dominate direction • dx1+ dx2 + dx3 = Σdx • dy1 +dy2 +dy3 = Σdy • Direction from home based on (Σdx, Σdy) 3. Calculate Δdirectionality (space) • 1997(Σdx, Σdy) – 1996 (Σdx, Σdy) Δ Time • 1997(distance) – 1996 (distance) (-1,2) (3,4) HOME HOME (0,0) (0,0) (1,-1) Δ Space = (3,-2) (Σdx, Σdy) = (3,5) 1996 Distance = 20 mi HOME HOME (0,0) • Outcome: Δ Activity Space • Δ Space (1, 2, 3, 4) where 1 = Δ NE, 2 = SE… • Δ Time 11 miles = Δ Distance (2,-3) (4,-4) (Σdx, Σdy) = (6,-7) 1997

  6. Δ Spatial behavior = Δ Activity spaces NW NE • Δ Time Log value NW NE SE SW 0.01 1 SW SE • ΔSpace Size of circle indicates intensity of change Color of circle indicates direction of change

  7. NW NE • Δ Time Log value NW NE SE SW 0.01 1 SW SE • ΔSpace Changes in activity spaces show time-variant spatial behavior in individuals

  8. New spatial patterns + new localized economic change 1993-1994 1990-1992 1996-1997 1994-1996 Persons with unique destinations Change in number of businesses for home zip code

  9. Spatial association between new spatial patterns and change in activity space The LISA statistic: Local Indicators of Spatial Association

  10. Thoughts so far… Extrapolating behavioral trends using longitudinal travel data seems to work. • Spatial behavior of individuals • How is their behavior changing over time can be studied • Next step: Extrapolate trends in behavioral change • Link to changes in the person or household, i.e. turning points • Spatial interactions in an urban environment • Correlate spatial outcomes of travel behavior and built environment • Next step: include other spatial factors that affect travel behavior, i.e. work-based accessibility

  11. Futures • Data’s at the individual level • Lots of peripheral data (age, marriage stats, etc.) • But, only a few hundred surveyed in a city of millions…

  12. Two of three ideas for future work: Lifestyle changes: Marriage and kids- can these very specific turning points in a persons life be gleaned from the travel behavior.? If so, can we then say something about how a persons travel behavior changes when they do; are there patterns that stand out? Change in the city: can patterns in the cities lifestyle be predicted? by residents travel behavior? Vice versa? (does change in city = change in behavior or does change in behavior = change in city or both and in what cases?)

  13. The big idea What is the most engaging question we can look at with this sort of data? I say it’s the sprawl… How did cities become there modern versions of themselves? How’d did the suburbs become where everyone wanted to live? Wanting a yard, a house to call your own, and a quiet neighborhood is not a new want. Was it a want that was only achievable recently? Did “good” transportation create the sprawl?

More Related