1 / 17

URPERA: The Electronic Recording Advisory Committee

Learn about the Florida Electronic Recording Advisory Committee, its provisions, organization, staffing, and standards development. Find out about the legislative status and the standards development process.

bradleyr
Download Presentation

URPERA: The Electronic Recording Advisory Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Florida Electronic Recording Advisory Committee Carmelo D. Bramante Managing Director CDB Consultancy LLC John L. Jones President Arion Zoe Corp. Co-Authors of the PRIA URPERA Enactment and eRecording Standards Implementation Guide Tallahassee, FL August 20, 2007 URPERA:The Electronic Recording Advisory Committee

  2. Topics • FL URPERA Electronic Recording Advisory Committee • Provisions • Organization, Staffing and Expertise • Standards Development and Maintenance • “Best Practice” Statements • Example: KS eRecording Standards 1.0 version

  3. URPERA Legislative Status • 8 Enactments in 2006: ArizonaDelawareDistrict of Columbia Kansas North Carolina TexasVirginia Wisconsin

  4. 2007 Bills Pending • 12 States have introduced URPERA, including: Arkansas (enacted) New Mexico (enacted) Connecticut Nevada (looking good) Florida (enacted) Rhode Island Idaho (enacted) South Carolina (looking good) Illinois (passed) Utah Missouri Washington

  5. FL URPERA Electronic Recording Advisory Committee Provisions

  6. FL URPERA: Provisions • Chose Alternative A: Electronic Recording Advisory Committee • FACC designated to provide administrative support • Altered definition of electronic signature

  7. FL URPERA Electronic Recording Advisory Committee Organization, Staffing and Expertise

  8. FL ER Advisory Committee: Organization • Industry Stakeholders • Continuing Existence • Business and Technical Expertise • Funding • Volunteerism • Self-funded or Recurring Source • Early Period • Later in the Commission’s Life

  9. FL ER Advisory Committee:Organizational Approach Critical Success Factors • Leadership • Organization • Preparation • Communication Activities • Inaugural Meeting • Ongoing

  10. FL ER Advisory Committee: Staffing and Expertise • Administrative Support • Organization and Process Oriented • State and local government expertise • Technological Knowledge • Web or Internet technologies • XML • Security • Ongoing Support • FACC as staff • Part-time or full-time status • Commissioners’ expertise • Volunteers • Business • Technological

  11. FL URPERA Electronic Recording Advisory Committee Standards Development and Maintenance

  12. FL ER Advisory Committee: Standards Resources • Industry Standards Setting Bodies • Property Records Industry Association (PRIA) • Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization (MISMO) • Other Organizations (AARTT, LegalXML, REIPA, ABA, NASS, etc.) • National Standards Setting Bodies • Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) • Electronic Document Formats, e.g., XHTML, TIF, PDF, DOC, etc. • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) • National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), e.g., XML, e-signatures, etc. • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) • State and Local Standards Setting Bodies

  13. FL ER Advisory Committee: Standards Development & Maintenance • Data • XML • Logical Data Dictionary • Extending National Data Standards to Address State and Local Data Needs • Packaging and Routing XML Data • Data Transmission Alternatives • Electronic Signatures • Electronic Document Formats, e.g., SMART DocumentTM, Intelligent PDF • Electronic Payment Options, e.g., ACH • Security • Transactional • Organizational

  14. FL ER Advisory Committee: Develop “Best Practice” Statements • Address Issues or Concerns Standards Cannot • Electronic Payment Alternatives • Organizational Security, e.g., Counties’ Security Policy • Priority: electronic queue vs. paper queue • Electronic Recording Implementation e.g., • Portal • Queuing – paper vs electronic documents

  15. FL ER Advisory Committee: To Determine? • Are standards and “best practice” statements rulemaking under State law? Or does the law already provide for this? • Do you need Operating Rules? • Should you develop a Charter? • Should you draft a “Scope” document or a “priority list” to stay focused? • Where to get resources? • Whom to invite to speak or present on topics relevant to the work of the commission or council? • Do you need workgroups or committees? • What areas or tasks? • Who can participate?

  16. Sources • PRIA URPERA Enactment and eRecording Standards Implementation Guide @ www.pria.us/newlypublished.htm • National Conference of Commissioners for Uniform State Laws @ www.nccusl.org • Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization @ www.mismo.org

  17. John L. Jones Arion Zoe Corp. 813 254-055 jjones@arionzoe.com Thank You Carmelo D. Bramante CDB Consultancy LLC 202.441.1396 carmen@cdbconsultancy.com

More Related