120 likes | 158 Views
Simplify installation and maintenance of DICOM Network Applications, automate collection and distribution of network parameters using industry standard IT protocols. Future vision profiles and trial test cases experience included.
E N D
DICOM Anniversary Conference & WorkshopBaltimore, 22-23 Sept 2003 Automatic Configuration of DICOM Network Applications Experience with Frozen Draft of Supplement 67 Andrew Hewett Siemens Medical Solutions
Scope – DICOM Configuration Management (Supplement 67) Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Simplify installation and maintenance of DICOM Network Applications • Reduce manual data entry of network parameters • Automate collection of network parameters • Automate distribution of network parameters • Use industry standard IT network protocols • DHCP – Obtain Network Parameters • DNS – Resolve names to addresses • NTP – Maintain accurate synchronized time • LDAP – Directory lookup of network devices & capabilities
Status Quo – Install a new Workstation Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Administrator / Technician / User • Identify network parameters of new Workstation • Manual entry of “self” network parameters • Hostname, IP-Address, Netmask, DNS, Default Gateway, … • Unused Unique AE Title(s), Local Port, Supported Services, … • Manual entry of “remote node” network parameters for each device with which communication is desired • Hostnames, IP-addresses, AE Titles, Ports • Supported Services, Roles, Transfer Syntaxes • Device type (e.g. RIS, Archive, Printer, …), … • Visit each device in network • Manually enter network parameters of new WS
Future – Install a new Workstation(Centrally Driven) Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Administrator • Creates name/credentials and registers WS with DHCP/DNS/LDAP • Loads predefined WS configuration in LDAP server • Device details, hostname, ports, AETs, SOP Classes, etc. • Peer (Workflow) Devices, etc. • Technician • Installs hardware & enters WS name/credentials • Workstation Automatically • Obtains network parameters & synchronizes to network time • Obtains “own” configuration from LDAP server • Technician • Refines WS configuration (if necessary)
Future – Install a new Workstation(Client Driven) Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Administrator • Creates name/credentials and registers WS with DHCP/DNS/LDAP • Technician • Installs hardware & enters WS name/credentials • Workstation Automatically • Obtains network parameters & synchronizes to network time • Identifies available unique DICOM AE Title(s) for own use • Registers WS own capabilities to LDAP server • Searches for “interesting” remote DICOM devices in LDAP Server • RIS, Archive, Network Printers, Workstations • Technician • Refines WS configuration (if necessary)
Future – Send images to a new WS Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • A new WS is installed • Other devices can immediately send images to new WS • Fully Dynamic Configuration (e.g. on a Modality) • Open Patient Browser (view of Local Database) • Select Patient and choose “Send to WS …” • Dialog shows “filtered” list of “assigned” Workstations • Obtained from central config server • Select desired WS (if more than 1) • Send images to selected WS • Using network parameters obtained from central config server (LDAP & DNS) • Many variations on this theme are possible
Configuration Management Profiles Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Products can claim conformance to separate Profiles • Network Address Management Profile • Obtain Network Parameters & Resolve names to addresses • Client must support DHCP & DNS • Time Synchronization Profile • Maintain accurate synchronized time • Client must support SNTP or NTP • DICOM Application Configuration Management Profile • Directory lookup of network devices & capabilities • Client must support LDAP protocol & DICOM schema • Each Profile defines • Actors & Transactions (Required/Optional)
Configuration Management Profiles Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Products can claim conformance to separate Profiles • Network Address Management Profile • Obtain Network Parameters & Resolve names to addresses • Client must support DHCP & DNS • Time Synchronization Profile • Maintain accurate synchronized time • Client must support SNTP or NTP • DICOM Application Configuration Management Profile • Directory lookup of network devices & capabilities • Client must support LDAP protocol & DICOM schema • Each Profile defines • Actors & Transactions (Required/Optional)
Trial Implementation Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • WG6 created a “Frozen Draft for Trial Implementation” • Sup67 is unusual for DICOM Standardization • Discover and fix problems before Ballot • “Frozen Draft” status will be reviewed in January 2004 • Siemens has developed a demo client implementation • Microsoft .NET Environment • Uses DirectoryServices class library for LDAP client support • Tested against the SunONE and OpenLDAP directory servers
Test Cases Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Install a new LDAP Server into a legacy network • Install a new managed device (pre-loaded LDAP Server configuration) • Install a new managed device (file-based data upload) • Install a new managed device (protocol-based data upload) • Find archives, workstations and printers • Change managed device configuration on the server • Change managed device configuration (file-based data upload) • Change managed device configuration (protocol-based data upload)
Trial Experience Scope Status Quo Future Vision Profiles Trial Test Cases Experience • Successfully completed all LDAP-related test cases • Limitations of LDAP server products & client libraries • Multi-valued RDNs • Modify RDN • Minor revisions to DICOM LDAP schema necessary • Clarification of some details necessary • Renaming a device • Intended use of “Peer AE Titles” • Important to test with multiple LDAP servers • Strict vs. lenient syntax checking