1 / 21

Rethinking fuel poverty in the UK February 2012

Rethinking fuel poverty in the UK February 2012. Donald Hirsch. Fuel poverty: three perspectives. The poverty perspective Problem: high fuel costs stress family budgets Focus: low income households. Fuel poverty: three perspectives. The health perspective

brandi
Download Presentation

Rethinking fuel poverty in the UK February 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rethinking fuel poverty in the UKFebruary 2012 Donald Hirsch

  2. Fuel poverty: three perspectives The poverty perspective • Problem: high fuel costs stress family budgets • Focus: low income households

  3. Fuel poverty: three perspectives The health perspective • Problem: unaffordable fuel costs create cold homes • Focus: groups not heating houses properly

  4. Fuel poverty: three perspectives The environmental perspective • Problem: poor housing stock uses fuel wastefully • Focus: thermally inefficient homes

  5. Fuel poverty: three perspectives The poverty perspective The health perspective • CORE DRIVERS • HOUSEHOLD INCOME • FUEL EFFICIENCY OF HOMES The environmental perspective

  6. An underlying concept Fuel poverty means living in “a household living on a lower income in a home which cannot be kept warm at reasonable cost” Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act 2000

  7. Key measurement issues • What is the threshold of low income? • What do we mean by reasonable cost? • How to combine these?

  8. Current definition Fuel poverty = having to spend at least 10% of income on fuel to keep home warm

  9. Current definition Problem 1: It doesn’t measure affordability Spending Total income/spending Available for non-fuel spending Needed for fuel Fuel poverty line (10% of income) Income

  10. Current definition Problem 2: Why 10%? Should the threshold change with changing norms?

  11. Current definition Problem 3: What is adequate warmth? Living room standard Average centrally heated homes Non-living room standard Risk of respiratory problems (where humidity not optimal) “no demonstrable risk” - WHO 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DEGREES CENTIGRADE

  12. Redefining fuel poverty –low income, unreasonable fuel costs Fuel costs* 60% median income High fuel costs *”Fuel costs”= required fuel spending Income Low Income

  13. Redefining fuel poverty –low income, unreasonable fuel costs High fuel costs 60% median income after fuel costs Low income

  14. Redefining fuel poverty –low income, unreasonable fuel costs High fuel costs 60% median income after fuel costs Median fuel costs Fuel poverty Low income

  15. Issues arising • Do rising fuel prices cause “fuel poverty” to rise proportionately? • What level of fuel efficiency is taken as “reasonable”? • What are the actual consequences of fuel poverty, for material hardship and for health?

  16. Consequences 1: fuel pre-empts family budget Risk of spending high proportion of income* on fuel Fuel poor Not fuel poor (old definition) Income poor Not income poor 60% 85% 5% 34% *At least 10% of disposable income (after housing costs)

  17. Consequences 1: fuel pre-empts family budget Risk of spending high proportion of income* on fuel • Hardest hit: Lone parents • Low average family income • High priority on meeting family needs *At least 10% of disposable income (after housing costs)

  18. Consequences 2: fuel spending low relative to need Risk of low fuel spending* as a % of requirement Fuel poor Not fuel poor (old definition) Income poor Not income poor 12% 43% 19% 46% *Below 40% of requirement to meet temperature norm

  19. Consequences 2: fuel spending low relative to need Risk of low fuel spending* as a % of requirement • Hardest hit: Single people (pensioners and non-pensioners) • More likely to have high relative fuel costs • More likely to spend less than “need” *Below 40% of requirement to meet temperature norm

  20. Conclusion: five key observations • Spending too little to heat an expensive home is not always linked to poverty (eg single pensioners) • Many families in poverty spend a high proportion of income on heating, regardless of fuel efficiency • Rising energy prices spread the problem • Targeting the housing stock will not always reach people in greatest need • Measures that target by income and housing efficiency may be best.

  21. Centre for Research in Social PolicySchofield BuildingLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughLeicestershireLE11 3TUTelephone: +44 (0)1509 223372crsp@lboro.ac.ukwww.crsp.ac.ukwww.minimumincomestandard.org

More Related