310 likes | 321 Views
Learn how to measure psychology attributes and what makes a good measurement. Explore latent constructs in science and the potential for miscommunication. Evaluate measurements using theoretical, statistical, methodological, and logical approaches.
E N D
Measurements and Validity Week 1, session 2
Today’s questions • How do you measure a psychology attribute? • What makes a good measurement?
Latent constructs in science • Latent = “present but invisible” • Psychological constructs are abstract • They must be inferred. • But this is not unique to psychology.
Latent constructs in science • Dark matter (physics) must also be inferred • https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HneiEA1B8ks
Problem • We can’t see it, so people disagree how best to measure it. • Potential for miscommunication (“Blind men & elephant”) • Potential for miscommunication fraudulent claims
Recall • Last session, we discussed how to measure greed, rudeness, etc. • That is: Given theory about X, how do you measure X? • This session, how do we evaluate X?
Evaluating a measurement • Theoretical • Statistical • Methodological • Logical
Theoretical constructions • Defining the construct and the domain of observables • Example: • What is shyness? • What is self-esteem?
Statistical methods • Does the measure correlate well with other measures? (Jargon: “predictive validity”) More if you take SRM I
Statistical methods • Does the measure correlate poorly with measures that it should correlate poorly with? It measures… Levels of radiation in water Levels of oxygen Levels of liquid More if you take SRM I
Statistical methods • Does the measure correlate poorly with measures that it should correlate poorly with? (Jargon: “discriminant validity”) Love Anger Disgust More if you take SRM I
Methodological reasoning • Construct has been defined. • A measurement has been made. • Measurement does predict outcome. No problems, right?
Example: Oxygen therapy Watch the “What is an Oxygen Bar” Video http://www.oxygenbars.com/
Example: Oxygen therapy • A researcher wants to find out if oxygen therapy works in improving happiness • He gives oxygen therapy to all customers and found that they became happier over time
Methodological reasoning Study A Study B More in Week 13 & SRM II
If oxygen therapy worked… • 1. You’d be superior to a fish • 2. You’d be dead (oxygen is toxic at high doses)
Logical reasoning • The theory behind the measurement should be sound. • This is difficult if you are not an expert. Hence we are susceptible to heuristic processing: “Dr Oz has an MD he must be correct” • If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Let’s examine the logic <True, False, Not sure> • We have a brain. • Brains consists of neurons. • An active neuron produces electrical charges • These electrical charges can be detected • Brain have different parts • Different parts are perform different functions (functional specialization) • When a part is active, electrical charges can be detected.
Let’s examine the logic <True, False, Not sure> • People are different • People think differently • Because people think differently, they have different personalities • Thinking produces electrical charge • EEG measures electrical charge • Therefore, EEG measures personality
References • Korjus K, Uusberg A, Uusberg H, Kuldkepp N, Kreegipuu K, Allik J, Vicente R and Aru J (2015) Personality cannot be predicted from the power of resting state EEG. Front. Hum. Neurosci.9:63.
Take home messages • Measurement problems are not unique to psychology • Four ways to evaluate a measurement • Theoretical • Statistical • Methodological • Logical • Use these methods to examine the issues in this course
Beware • “Science has proven…” • Pictures of brains sell • Profit-driven • Advocates who have not published scientific papers in reputable journals • Confirmation bias • Shoddy science • Premature science
The broader picture • Critical thinking in psychology as an inoculation against pseudoscience • https://www.ted.com/talks/james_randi?language=en