1 / 13

Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians’ intentions to violate traffic regulations

Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians’ intentions to violate traffic regulations. 學生:董瑩蟬. Purpose. This paper main used questionnaire to investigate the parameters of people violations traffic rules. Used data to build a model evaluated those parameters. Reference.

Download Presentation

Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians’ intentions to violate traffic regulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians’ intentionsto violate traffic regulations 學生:董瑩蟬

  2. Purpose • This paper main used questionnaire to investigate the parameters of people violations traffic rules. • Used data to build a model evaluated those parameters.

  3. Reference • There were high percentage of pedestrian accident in chile. (Carabineros de Chile, 1996) • The driver was as the culpable in the accidents. (Moyano Diaz, 1997) • Many studies already applied the theory of accidents behavior on driver. (Parker et al.,1995; Parker et al.,1992a; Parker et al.,1992b )

  4. Reference • Previous studies showed that the driver bad behavior include violations, error and lapses. (Reason et al.,1990) • Pervious Study found the young and man has poor ability to estimating risk. (Gregersen,1996) • Older people has low commit violations, man more likely risk than women. (Parker et al.,1995,1992a,b)

  5. Method • Subject • 146 participants • Age:55 younger (range 17-25) 91 older (more than 26) • Restrict: driver license • From: Santiago

  6. Method • Materials • The questionnaire was developed from a driver behavior questionnaire. (Parker et al.,1992a) • The used Likert five-point items. • The question include subject attitude toward of this aberrant behavior, subject norm and perceived behavioral control. • The second instrument was “ scale of pedestrian behavior ” with Likert six-point items. About pedestrian violations, error, lapses.

  7. Result • ALL parameters reach significant value.

  8. Result

  9. Result • Young people significant more attitude towards behavior than adult (older).(t(144)=2.98,p<0.05) ,and subjective norm , perceived behavior control and behavioral intention.(t(144)=2.81,p<0.01 ,t(144)=2.91,p<0.05) • The gender, status user, accident involvement were no significant different.

  10. Result

  11. Result • Young people responses more violations (t(144)=-4.82,p<0.01), error (t(144)=-3.26,p<0.01), lapses (t(144)=-4.08,p<0.01). • Men responses more violations than women (t(144)=3.77,p<0.001) • The status user, accident involvement were no significant different.

  12. Discussion • Young person has high violation, errors and lapses. The result similar to parker et al. (1995, 1992a, b) • Accident prevention and traffic education should require the pedestrian and driver compliance traffic regulations. (Moyano Diaz, 1997)

  13. Conclusion • Young people has more intention to commit violations. • Men has more violations traffic rules than women.

More Related