410 likes | 585 Views
Software Attacks. Buffer Overflow. Outline of the seminaries. + 2-3 hours seminars by YOU =). 8 hours, 4 lessons Buffer overflow, introduction: Stack smashing, concepts, practical example (Blaster) Mitigations Buffer overflow: new techniques Heap smashing, concepts, the heap in Win32
E N D
Software Attacks Buffer Overflow
Outline of the seminaries + 2-3 hours seminars by YOU =) • 8 hours, 4 lessons • Buffer overflow, introduction: • Stack smashing, concepts, practical example (Blaster) • Mitigations • Buffer overflow: new techniques • Heap smashing, concepts, the heap in Win32 • Countermeasures: WinXP SP2 • Integer overflow and DLL injection • A Win32 process memory layout • An example: IAT patching, memory walking • Countermeasures: managed languages (Java, .NET) • An example: .NET Code Access Security
Buffer overflow is the most frequent vulnerability (ca 50% of security problems) See for example, MS bulletins, CERT, BugTraq. Software attacks • A VULNERABILITY is a security flaw caused by a software defect. • An EXPLOIT is a technique that take advantage of a vulnerability. A malicious hacker uses them to ATTACK a system. • For each vulnerability, many EXPLOIT may exist
Software attacks Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-26 (buffer overflow vulnerability exploited by Blaster) Author Technique Notes Last Stage of Delirium Unknown Original report Never published Xfocus Stack smashing Apparently same as Blasterwww.xfocus.org/ D. Litchfield Pointer subterfuge Cigital Pointer subterfuge K-oitic Arc injection Pincus, Baker Arc injection + Pointer subterfuge
Buffer overflow: some basic • A buffer is a contiguous block of memory, that holds multiple instances of the same data type • To a C programmer, a buffer is usuallychar buffer[200]; • [Orchar* buffer = (char*)malloc(200);] • In the latter case, we have a dynamically allocated buffer -> we’ll consider this case later • In fact, it is possible to overflow (and exploit) various types of buffers. • The first one we’ll see, is the stack buffer overflow
A buffer overflow is a condition created by a defect in a program. void printFunc(char* str) {char buffer[20]; strcpy(buffer, str); ...} Buffer overflow: some basic (2) Buffers are commonly used, especially in network programming. char recvbuf[32]; bytesRecv = recv(ConnectSocket, recvbuf, 32, 0); What if str is more than 20 characters?
What about this address? We’ll see in a moment… What is a Buffer Overflow? In most cases, if it’s a programming error, a buffer overflow results in a Segmentation Fault / Memory Access error void func() {char buffer[20];char* current = buffer; for(int i =0; i <256;++i){*current ='A';++current;}}
How can this lead to a software attack? You can use it to inject code/data in a program and then Change the program control flow. (If used bad) you can crash a system process (DoS) (If used well) Can lead to privilege escalation / Malicious Code execution.
How can this lead to a software attack?(2) In the stack smashing exploit, a buffer allocated on the stack is overflowed to overwrite a particular area of the stack. This approach is very architecture dependent: So, let’s see how is the stack configuration of a process (x86, but is valid for every architecture)
Memory layout • The attack is architecture dependent • We take as an example Win32 on an x86 CPU • Each process has its own Virtual Address Space, which is divided into several areas: text, bss, stack, heap, etc… 0x00000000 0x00030000 stack 0x00130000 0x00140000 heap • We’ll see the heap in more detail in another lesson 0x00400000 Exe image 0x7FFFFFFF
The Stack • Why the stack? Function calls! • Pop, push, EBP, ESP • Stack grow from 0x00130000 to 0x0003000 (from high to low) <- this is due to x86 stack instructions 0x00030000 … Page guard 2 pages committed 0x00130000
Stack configuration (1) Let’s see what asm code the following (simple) program generates: void f(int a, int b) { char buffer[20]; int i; int j; j = a; i = a + b; } int main() { f(2, 3); return 0; } push ebp mov ebp, esp sub esp, 28 ; 4 : char buffer[20];; 5 : int i;; 6 : int j; ; 7 : j = a;; 8 : i = a + b; mov eax, DWORD PTR [ebp + 8h] ; a mov DWORD PTR [ebp - 8], eax ; j EBP - 8 add eax, DWORD PTR [ebp + 0Ch] ; b mov DWORD PTR [ebp - 4], eax ; i EBP - 4 mov esp, ebp pop ebp ret 0 push ebp mov ebp, esp sub esp, 0; 13 : f(2, 3); push 3 push 2 call _f; 14 : return 0; xor eax, eax mov esp, ebp pop ebp ret 0 Do it by yourself! /Fas (VC) –save_temps (gcc)
Stack configuration (2) And now let’s see how a function call is made ESP 0x0012FE84 004119A2 Return address 0x0012FE88 00000003 a 0x0012FE8C 00000002 b
Stack configuration (2) PUSH EBP ESP 0x0012FE80 0012FE90 EBP saved 0x0012FE84 004119A2 Return address 0x0012FE88 00000003 a 0x0012FE8C 00000002 b
Stack configuration (2) MOV EBP, ESP ESP 0x0012FE80 0012FE90 EBP saved 0x0012FE84 004119A2 Return address EBP 0x0012FE88 00000003 a 0x0012FE8C 00000002 b
Stack configuration (2) ESP Unitiliazed buffer SUB ESP, 28 i unitiliazed j unitiliazed 0x0012FE80 0012FE90 EBP saved 0x0012FE84 004119A2 Return address EBP 0x0012FE88 00000003 a 0x0012FE8C 00000002 b NB! EBP let us know where local variables and parameter are located! EBP – offset -> localsEBP + 8 + offset -> params
Stack configuration (3) Do you remember? Let’s see a slightly more complex example push ebp mov ebp, esp sub esp, 28 ; 4 : char buffer[20];; 5 : int i;; 6 : int j; ; 7 : j = a;; 8 : i = a + b; mov eax, DWORD PTR [ebp + 8h] ; a mov DWORD PTR [ebp - 8], eax ; j add eax, DWORD PTR [ebp + 0Ch] ; b mov DWORD PTR [ebp - 4], eax ; i mov esp, ebp pop ebp ret 0 void f(int a, int b, char* str) { char buffer[12]; int i; int j; j = a; i = a + b; strcpy(buffer, str); } Where str = “averyverylongstring”
…and after! ESP averyverylon buffer i gstr j ing\0 0x0012FE80 0012FE90 EBP saved 0x0012FE84 004119A2 Return address EBP 0x0012FE88 00000003 a 0x0012FE8C 00000002 b Stack smashing Unitiliazed ESP buffer Before strcpy… i unitiliazed j unitiliazed 0x0012FE80 0012FE90 EBP saved 0x0012FE84 004119A2 Return address EBP 0x0012FE88 00000003 a 0x0012FE8C 00000002 b
Overwriting return address • If we go further, we have the saved frame pointer, plus the return address • Go overwrite it, placing an address of our choice! • The buffer could be filled with code of our own choice!
AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA Old sfp 20 10 40 00 AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA 20 10 40 00 AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA 90 10 40 00 Fill buffer owr sfp owr ret Overwriting return address //00401090staticchar message[]="AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA\x90\x10\x40\x00"; void handleRequest() {char buffer[20]; strcpy(buffer, message); printf("Request: %s\n", buffer);} void doNastyThings() { printf("He he!!\n");} int main() {while(1){ handleRequest();}return0;} DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD Old sfp 20 10 40 00
Shellcode writing • We have only injected an arc, modifying the control flow of a program, but we can inject code as well • This requires us to write some shellcode • A shellcode is a small portion of machine code we write by hand, and then insert in the buffer
0x0012FF20 SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSPPPPP20FF1200 Shellcode injection • The shellcode has to be small, and it must not contain terminators for the function overflowing the buffer (ex: \n, \x00, \r,…) • We “send” it in the buffer before the return address, and then point the return address back in the buffer S = shellcode; P = padding
NOP • Problem: At what address our code will be? What do we (over)write as ret? int f(){} int g(){ f();} int main() { f(); g();} f stack frame ? f stack frame g stack frame main stack frame main stack frame 0x00130000 • Answer: • Estimate (stack start always at the same address (0x00130000 on Win32)) • Use nop(s) to have a margin (otherwise) Trampolining (more on this later)
0x0012FF20 NNNNNSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS40FF1200 NOP (2) S = shellcode; N = NOP Our estimate is not precise, but it works nonetheless [How to write a shellcode?]
Exploits possible • Overwrite ret with an address pointing back to the buffer, use NOPs to increment probabilities (stack protection) • Overwrite ret with an absolute address, taken by a Win32 dll (ex: WinExec in kernel32.dll) (but the params? – hardcoded addresses change) • Find a trampoline (jmp reg, call reg) at an absolute address (same as before)
A simple example (Demo?)
(Brief COM introduction) • What is COM? Component Object Model: object are in DLLs and can be used locally or invoked remotely (ex: DirectX, Active Directory, ADO, etc.) • Component implement some interfaces • The COM runtime provides function to load/locate/create components • These functions MUST work for both locally avalable AND server-side components
IClassFactory return IUnknown* to client IClassFactory::CreateInstance IUnknown CoGetInstanceFromFile IPersistFile return IUnknown* to client IPersistFile::Load The COM model IUnknown CoCreateInstance
The RPC-DCOM interface vulnerability (1) HRESULT CoGetInstanceFromFile( COSERVERINFO * pServerInfo,CLSID * pclsid, IUnknown * punkOuter, DWORD dwClsCtx, DWORDgrfMode, OLECHAR * szName, ULONG cmq, MULTI_QI * rgmqResults); Includes name of server Name of file containing persistant object Message is packed for RPC request, and the string passed to server is assembled in this way “\\servername\filename”
Here the only check done is ‘\’ (cmp ax, 5Ch)! Here buffer is 32 only! (max length of a NETBIOS name) The RPC-DCOM interface vulnerability (2) At server side GetPathForServer GetMachineName String is assembled by system, BUT we can assemble a malicious request building an ad-hoc packet!
The RPC-DCOM interface vulnerability (3) GetPathForServer;.text:761543DA push ebp.text:761543DB mov ebp, esp.text:761543DD sub esp, 20h <-----the length is only 0x20.text:761543E0 mov eax, [ebp+arg_4].text:761543E3 push ebx.text:761543E4 push esi.text:761543E5 mov esi, [ebp+hMem].text:761543E8 push edi.text:761543E9 push 5Ch.text:761543EB pop ebx.text:761543EC mov [eax], esi.text:761543EE cmp [esi], bx.text:761543F1 mov edi, esi.text:761543F3 jnz loc_761544BF.text:761543F9 cmp [esi+2], bx.text:761543FD jnz loc_761544BF.text:76154403 lea eax, [ebp+String1] <----addr to place servername, only 0X20.text:76154406 push 0.text:76154408 push eax.text:76154409 push esi <------------here is the parameter of filename .text:7615440A call GetMachineNameGetMachineName:.text:7614DB6F mov eax, [ebp+arg_0].text:7614DB72 mov ecx, [ebp+arg_4].text:7614DB75 lea edx, [eax+4].text:7614DB78 mov ax, [eax+4].text:7614DB7C cmp ax, 5Ch <-----------check if it is 0X5C,if yes,the servername is over
The exploit One of the published exploits is by Xfocus.org (many others, remember?) It uses a trampoline (jmp esp) On XP SP1, there is one at 0x77d737db More details, plus the documentation and the complete exploit, on their website
Workarounds • So, how can we avoid such situations? • Some over-simplistic recommendations: • Move-to-heap -> heap smashing! • Use “safe” functions: avoid using C library functions (like strcpy) -> is not a panacea! strncpy vulnerabilities • Remember Blaster void ConcatString(char *buf1, char *buf2, size_t len1, size_t len2) { char buf[256]; if((len1 + len2) > 256) return -1; memcpy(buf, buf1, len1); memcpy(buf + len1, buf2, len2); }
Mitigations • What is a mitigation? Instead of letting malicious hackers obtain control over a machine, kill process • If the program/OS is aware that there is a buffer overflow, terminate program • It can have a DoS effect, but arbitrary code excecution is MUCH worse!
i unitiliazed locals j unitiliazed StackCanary memory grows Stack grows 0x0012FE80 0012FE90 EBP saved 0x0012FE84 004119A2 Return address 0x0012FE88 00000003 a params 0x0012FE8C 00000002 b StackGuard • The first to introduce canaries Canaries is checked before the asm ret instruction The StackGuard idea: terminator canary Is a word “\x00\n\r\xFF”
VC 7.X stack canary (Windows XP SP2 & Windows 2003 Server) • Recently introduced in Visual C++ • Canary is a random word, so it works better then StackGuard • However, stack protection has still several vulnerabilities • Double Cookie Overwrite • Security Handler Overwrite • Replacing the Windows System Directory • Ldr* function pointer overwrites • See http://www.nextgenss.com/papers/defeating-w2k3-stack-protection.pdf
They can be defeated • Heap overflow • Trampolines over canary • (StackGuard) terminators (Blaster) • Arc injection, function pointer overwrites, new buffer overflow techniques (next lessons)
NX bit • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NX • NX bit may prevent the stack and heap memory areas from being executable, and may prevent executable memory from being writable • Not available on x86-32 (but available on x86-64)
Conclusions (some advices by G. McGraw) • The network is populated with untrustworthy people • All input should not be trusted until proven otherwise • Do not trust input that comes from non-validated sources • If user/caller does not authenticate, do not extend trust • Use a "white list" instead of a "black list" • Determine what is legal and reject the rest • Test carefully with illegal values (fault injection) • Limit maximum characters length
[Overwriting function pointers] Attack known as pointer subterfuge void func(void* arg, size_t len){char buffer[100];void(*f)()=...; memcpy(buff, arg, len);//buffer overflow f();...} It may seems not so common.. But it has no mitigations and in other forms is very widely used… …but we’ll see it in another lesson!