1 / 14

EURO 

EURO . A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe. Status of EUROnu Costing, safety, etc Annual reports Milestones and deliverables for WP1 This meeting. Status of EUROnu. 21/48 th finished! Much progress since last meeting: Only just started then

brenda-wallace
Download Presentation

EURO 

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe • Status of EUROnu • Costing, safety, etc • Annual reports • Milestones and deliverables for WP1 • This meeting

  2. Status of EUROnu • 21/48th finished! • Much progress since last meeting: • Only just started then • This meeting will show significant progress • Using EC metrics • 34 documents • 52 meetings • 7 new associates since we started • Many issues raised at 1st meeting, by IAP, etc, dealt with

  3. Status of EUROnu • Scientifically, EUROnu not important! • Politically it is: • Recognised as part of CERN strategy • Main European activity on 2nd generation facilities • Strong connection to IDS-NF • Point of contact with CERN management • Input to SPC Neutrino Panel • ECFA/Strategy secretariat (+ ICFA?) review panel • Review IDS and next EUROnu report • Maintains important role • Internationalises further

  4. Costing, Safety, etc • Outputs of EUROnu: • Performance • Cost • Safety • (Technical) risk • Cost • very important! • very limited resources • needs to be done efficiently and coherently as pos. • taken on by Ilias

  5. Costing Workshop • Need a costing panel • Need a PBS/WBS • allows exploitation of overlaps • same approach, assumptions, etc • Combined approach to experts • Use CLIC tool: • some work already done • use well defined (defendable) techniques • even methods of making a choice • More later

  6. Safety • To come next • Workshop planned • Focus on big, potentially show-stopping issues • Technical risk: • identify issues requiring further R&D • focus large impact things • hopefully, comes out of other work?

  7. Annual Report #1 • Not (quite) done with! • Was submitted late • More (trivial) information requested • All now received and submitted • Many lessons learnt (by me!) • We must all do better next time

  8. Annual Report #2 • Includes independent Technical review • Outcome between • Everything is fine, continue unchanged • Cancel and repay EC funding • Next report: submitted by end October! • all due milestones and deliverables done • WP reports • Form Cs done & signed • Explanations of costs done • Work will start in August • Review during next annual meeting: RAL – Jan/Feb 2011

  9. WP1 Deliverables

  10. WP1 Deliverables • D8 done and being written up • Criteria not completely defined, e.g. θ13 known? • But use obvious: • Physics: - δ - θ13 - Δm223 • Cost and schedule • Safety: - personnel - environmental impact • Risk: - technical - only show-stoppers

  11. WP1 Deliverables • Ultimately, would be good to have figure of merit • Techniques exist to do this • Easier to do if θ13 known • Otherwise, use 3 cases: • large, e.g. >10-2 • intermediate, e.g. >10-3 & <10-2 • small, e.g. <10-3 • Needs results of costing and safety panels

  12. WP1 Milestones

  13. WP1 Milestones • Not possible to do yet • Will use the most recent results from WP6 • Hence, preliminary physics only comparison

  14. This Meeting • Very important! • Preparation for technical review…… • ……..but plenty of science as well • Welcome to the 2nd annual EUROnu meeting!

More Related