290 likes | 309 Views
This study explores the representation and maturation of temporal sound processing including gap detection, duration discrimination, masking, and modulation transfer. Different measures mature at varied ages, with factors like intensity resolution and decision strategy potentially contributing to processing immaturity.
E N D
Temporal processing Representation of the temporal characteristics of sound
Different measures of temporal processing mature at different rates • Gap detection • Duration discrimination • Forward and backward masking • Temporal modulation transfer function
Level (dB) Level (dB) Time (ms) Time (ms) Gap detection Interval 2 Interval 1 Which one had a gap?
Gap detection for infants Level (dB) Time (ms)
Level (dB) Frequency (Hz) Level (dB) Level (dB) Time (ms) Time (ms) Gap detection by infants: Werner et al. (1992)
Adaptation Recovery Susceptibility to adaptation
Amplitude Adaptation Time Recovery Forward masking as a measure of susceptibility to adaptation
Backward masking Amplitude Time
1 adult unmasked threshold 0.9 Infant unmasked threshold 0.8 p(C) 0.7 0.6 Infants Adults 0.5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 Level (dB SPL) Backward masking: Infants
Amplitude modulation: frequency and depth 25%, -12 dB 100%, 0 dB 10 Hz 10 Hz 20 Hz
-25 adults 3-month-olds -20 6-month-olds -15 -10 Modulation depth, 20 log m (dB) -5 0 1 10 100 512 Modulation frequency (Hz) TMTF: Infants
Summary of results on different measures • Gap detection: mature at 6 years • Duration discrimination: mature at 10 years • Forward masking: mature at 6 months • Backward masking: mature at 11 years • TMTF: mature at 4 years (3 months?)
Summary There doesn’t seem to be one age at which all sorts of temporal processing are mature
Possible additional contributors to immature temporal processing • Intensity resolution • Memory • Confusion • Decision strategy