190 likes | 200 Views
Session 12 STEPS 3 AND 4. Stage 2 Detail Design Submission should include an updated cost estimate and the following: (Not every item listed will apply to every project). Bridge Plans generally consisting of the following: Site Plan in compliance with all Stage 1 review comments
E N D
Stage 2 Detail DesignSubmission should include an updated cost estimate and the following:(Not every item listed will apply to every project) • Bridge Plans generally consisting of the following: • Site Plan in compliance with all Stage 1 review comments • General Plan (if required) • General Notes • Phase Construction Details • Foundation Plan • Abutment Details with all dimensioning, bar marks and bar spacings properly shown • Pier Details with all dimensioning, bar marks and bar spacings properly shown • Superstructure Details with all dimensioning, bar marks and bar spacings properly shown • Other Details as necessary
The Stage 2 Detail Design Submission <Continued> • Retaining Wall Plans generally consisting of the following: • General Notes • Retaining wall details • Other Details as necessary • Noise Barrier Plans generally consisting of the following: • General Notes • Plan and Profile Views • Noise Barrier Details • Foundations Table • Subsurface Investigation Plan Sheets • Other Details as necessary • Special Provisions • Load Rating Reports for bridges (Major and Minor PDP)
Stage 3 Detail Design Submission should include an updated cost estimate and the following: • Stage 2 Detail Design plans in compliance with all Stage 2 review comments. • Completed Estimated Quantities Table • Completed Reinforcing Steel Schedule • Estimated Quantities calculations • Load Rating Reports for bridges (Minimal PDP only)
Item 65 Vertical Clearance • Interstates, freeways, expressways & arterial • Minimum clearance 16.5’ • Collectors & Local • Minimum clearance 14.5’ • REQUIRED AT ALL POINTS LESS THAN 14’-6”
L & D Manual Vertical & Horizontal Clearance
LOADING REQUIREMENTS • All bridge structures shall be designed for an HS25 loading or the alternate military loading, whichever produces the greatest stresses and live load deflections, unless otherwise stated in this manual. Figure 301 illustrates the HS25 truck and lane loadings. • All bridges shall be designed for a future wearing surface (FWS) of 60 psf . • All steel structures shall be designated as Case I or Case II as defined by AASHTO for fatigue design. • Bridge structures on LPA projects shall be designed to the same loading requirements as traditionally funded projects except an HS20-44 loading may be used in lieu of the HS25 ] loading.
Other Zinc Coatings Metallized Hot-Dip Galvanized Zinc-Rich Paint Galvanized Sheet Electroplated