400 likes | 520 Views
The result of GoldenDOM Calibration. Hiroko Miyamoto T.Noda, S.Yoshida, K.Mase K.Hoshina, M.Krasberg, K.Hanson, C.Rott Chiba University, UW Madison, PSU. Who is doing what?. Chiba University Hiroko, Keiichi, Tsuyoshi, Shigeru UW-Madison Kael, Mark, Chris and FAT people … PSU
E N D
The result of GoldenDOM Calibration Hiroko Miyamoto T.Noda, S.Yoshida, K.Mase K.Hoshina, M.Krasberg, K.Hanson, C.Rott Chiba University, UW Madison, PSU
Who is doing what? • Chiba University Hiroko, Keiichi, Tsuyoshi, Shigeru • UW-Madison Kael, Mark, Chris and FAT people… • PSU Carsten, Martin
Contents • Golden PMT calibration @ Chiba • Golden DOM calibration @ Chiba (useful LC circuit!) • DOM vs PMT? • Schedule
Golden PMT/DOM production and calibration 2005/06 deployment SouthPole FAT#8 Madison Chiba Chiba PMT calibration Chiba DOM calibration Hamamatsu Hamamatsu PMT QE calibration 2004,Nov 2005,Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
IceCube Golden PMT/DOM calibrations at Chiba [DOM] Room Temperature • Relative Collection Efficiency (4π) • Absolute Efficiency (1 point) [PMT] Low Temperature (-32C) • Gain • Waveform • Noise Rate Room Temperature • Relative Collection Efficiency (2π) • Absolute QExCE Efficiency (1 slice) http://www.ppl.phys.chiba-u.jp/research/IceCube/pmt/GoldenPMT/ for GoldenPMT calibration 2005
Hakkenden (“eight” dog) Warriors….? DOM namePMT # Sosuke_Inukawa : TA1181 --failed Dosetsu_Inuyama : TA1069 Shino_Inuzuka : TA1052 Genpachi_Inukai : TA1167 Kobungo_Inuta : TA1062 Keno_Inuzaka : TA1056 --failed Shinbei_Inue : TA1059 Daikaku_Inuyama : TA1176 --failed
2D PMT Scan • Data library available • Implemented in the detector MC
2D CE map I TA1052 TA1059 TA1062
2D CE map II TA1069 TA1167
Chamber and DAQ ATTENUATOR Pressure meter Temp monitor
QExCE(absolute efficiency) = photoelectron # / cathode hit photon # Estimate incidental photon #. cathode hit photon # ~initial photon#xaperture x Cross Section Energy meter Numerical calculation Typically, ~4x109x5x10-11~ 0.2
Pedestal subtraction sf0077@1atm
How useful external trigger is? • SPE-based measurement SPE-based study is very important and fundamental, but we can’t see SPE signals from light source because of the bunch of noise • Control trigger rate You don’t need to take 10 kHz dark noises anymore but signals at a rate just as you like • Standalone operation DOM can take the data from the light source by itself alternatively (you don’t need other DOMs or MB anymore) • After pulse measurement You can trigger anytime you like, which enables you to see after pulses
N2 N2 laser Absolute efficiency measurement for DOM Same setup as for PMT (with 337nm N2 laser), except: • 2000 incidental photons (increase the laser luminosity)
Shino_Inuzuka POS.1 DOM surface POS.2 POS.3 ~2cm POS.1 POS.3 POS.2
DOM efficiency Acceptance(l) + Glass/gel transmittance
DOM 2D 4p scan Combine DOM absolute efficiency and DOM 2D scanning map! Map out the detection efficiency
Dosetsu_Inuyama Very very preliminary!
By the way… Quad-LC signal works very well as a event trigger. Cosmic μ (bkg) Rayleigh scattered Photon signal peak Externally triggered LED signal, no bkg
How about next year? • We are providing another set of 8 Golden DOMs next year. • Chiba calibrate and ship them to UW via Hamamatsu in May 2006 for FAT in May or June.
Discussion Any idea for this year?(with 5 Golden DOMs…) For example…. Ice Layer
2D CE map I TA1052 TA1059 TA1062
2D CE map II TA1069 TA1167