1 / 1

Edward A. Gill, MD, Mariko Welch, MD, Thom Schessler , Nayak Polissar , PhD

Introduction.

Download Presentation

Edward A. Gill, MD, Mariko Welch, MD, Thom Schessler , Nayak Polissar , PhD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction • Given the rising prevalence of obesity, there is increasing need for perflutren lipid microsphere intravenous contrast use with echocardiography. It is contraindicated in the suspected or known presence of intracardiac shunt (PFO). Using a large retrospective database, we determined the rate of adverse events among perflutren users, including events in subjects incidentally found to have a PFO. There were two major purposes: 1) Determine the demographics of patients with back pain secondary to perflutren and 2) adverse events when PFO was present Adverse Events With Perflutren Lipid Microsphere Intravenous Contrast in Subjects With and Without Patent Foramen Ovale Edward A. Gill, MD, Mariko Welch, MD, Thom Schessler, NayakPolissar, PhD Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA Adverse Events: Subject Demographics Characteristics of PFO Subjects Methods • All subjects who underwent transthoracic echo (TTE) with the use of perflutren contrast at a tertiary medical center 01/01/03 - 06/01/12 were retrospectively assessed. Subjects who experienced adverse events during the 48 hr peri-procedural period were categorized by type of adverse events. • All subjects who had undergone a saline contrast study in tandem with perflutren contrast were also evaluated: those subjects who had PFOs diagnosed as result of this index study were compared to those without a PFO. Conclusions/Discussion Results • Although headache and abnormal taste are said to be the most common side effects of perflutren, we found back pain (43%) to be the most common • Although our cohort was too small (51) patients to make conclusions about the safety of perflutren in patients found to have a PFO, there were no adverse events in this group • The incidence of adverse events (0.6%) was too low to make any conclusion about the demographics of the patients with back pain • Adverse events were reported in 29 patients of the 4,722 total receiving perflutren. None of these individuals underwent a saline contrast study to determine if PFO was present. • Back pain was the most frequently reported adverse event (43%). No CVAs or MIs were reported in the entire cohort. • 51 patients were identified that had received perflutren and later were found to have a PFO. None had any adverse events within 48 hours of the initial TTE.

More Related