1 / 25

Strongsville City School District

Strongsville City School District. Facilities Utilization Advisory Committee OSFC Presentation November 3, 2009. Strongsville City School District. Ohio School Facilities Commission Programs :. Classroom Facilities Assistance Program (CFAP)

brianharris
Download Presentation

Strongsville City School District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strongsville City School District Facilities Utilization Advisory Committee OSFC Presentation November 3, 2009

  2. Strongsville City School District Ohio School Facilities Commission Programs: Classroom Facilities Assistance Program (CFAP) Provides funding for a share of the entire facilities needs within a district Exceptional Needs Program (ENP) Application based building replacement program to address health & safety of students Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP) Allows school districts estimated to be over two years away from eligibility for state assistance (CFAP) to fund a portion of their facilities master plan through local monies prior to the time state funding becomes available through the CFAP; a district-wide assessment and master facilities plan is provided by the commission

  3. Strongsville City School District What are the Opportunities in Developing a Comprehensive Master Facilities Plan? • Evaluate Curriculum and Educational Delivery • Evaluate and Realign (if desired) Vertical Organization (i.e., grade groupings) • Evaluate Current Population Centers for Building Locations • Right Size District’s Capital Assets with Projected Student Population • Develop Partnerships for Community Learning Centers • Deliver Quality Education More Efficiently and Reduce Operating Costs

  4. Strongsville City School District Where does Strongsville City Stand? • November 2000 – ELPP application • May 2001 – Facilities Assessment • November 2002 – Withdrew from ELPP • February 2008 – Reapplied for ELPP • February 2009 – Facilities Reassessment • April 2009 – District accepted ten-year Enrollment Projections • Master Plan options developed based on February 2009 Assessment and April 2009 Enrollment Projections

  5. Strongsville City School District How is the District’s Local Share Determined? ODE 2010 Eligibility Ranking #560 Ohio State Share 8% Local Share* 92% * Based on FY10 ODE Eligibility Ranking List

  6. Strongsville City School District Historical Equity Ranking

  7. Strongsville City School District Enrollment Projection by Grade Planning Year

  8. Strongsville City School District OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles • Enrollment Projections: • 5 year out planning for declining enrollment • 10 year out planning for increasing enrollment • 2/3rds Guideline: • Waiver Process • Must demonstrate safe, educationally adequate • operationally efficient • Co-funding up to 100% replacement cost • 1/3rd Guideline: • District discretion on scope • Code, health and safety scope must be included

  9. Strongsville City School District OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles: • 350 Rule (ORC 3318.03(c)): • Minimum 350 students to be housed (renovate or new) • Square Foot / Student Allocation: • Sliding Scale (based on grade grouping and population) • Oversized Space Calculation (renovated buildings) • Excess Space (renovated buildings)

  10. Elementary School Student PopulationSF / StudentCost / SF 350 – 400 125 $224.49 401 – 600 124 - 115 $216.02 601 – 865 115 $207.00 866 and up 115 $201.11 site size recommendation = 10 acres + 1acre per 100 students Middle School Student PopulationSF / StudentCost / SF 350 – 450 151 $224.99 451 – 650 150 - 141 $212.27 651 – 709 141 $211.87 710 and up 141 $205.92 site size recommendation = 20 acres + 1acre per 100 students High School Student PopulationSF / StudentCost / SF 350 – 598 180 - 167 $224.20 599 – 800 167 - 166 $217.83 801 – 1,200 166 - 165 $213.58 1,201 and up 164 - 156 $208.73 site size recommendation = 35 acres + 1acre per 100 students *Region 8

  11. Strongsville City School District OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles: • 350 Rule (ORC 3318.03(c)): • Minimum 350 students to be housed (renovate or new) • Square Foot / Student Allocation: • Sliding Scale (based on grade grouping and population) • Oversized Space Calculation (renovated buildings) • Excess Space (renovated buildings)

  12. OSDM (total sf required) 166,000 sf (1,000 st. x 166 sf/st.) 173,110 sf (total building less oversized sf) - = 19,193 sf(oversized sf) Existing High School 192,303 sf(total building sf) OSDM (total sf required) 166,000 sf (1,000 st. x 166 sf/st.) - Actual SF SF Per OSDM Oversized SF Excess SF (PALFI) (additional excess sf) 7,110 31,000 29,307 1,693 Corridors 3,000 Gymnasium 17,000 14,000 (total PALFI sf) 20,110 1,500 Media Center 5,000 3,500 7,000 Natatorium 7,000 Non-OSDM 7,000 6,000 Auditorium 6,000 Non-OSDM 6,000 19,193 13,000

  13. Strongsville City School District OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles: • Locally Funded Initiatives (LFI): • Project Agreement LFI (PALFI) • Elective • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED): • Silver Certification w/emphasis on points in energy category • Segmenting- CFAP: • Entire building project minimum (i.e., complete renovation, • complete new building) • Minimum local share = 4% of district’s assessed valuation

  14. Strongsville City School District OSFC Budgeting Guidelines: State of Ohio Summary of New Construction“Opinion of Probable Costs” per square foot of floor areaRegion 8 (northeast)2009 Design Manual Update

  15. Strongsville City School District A. Heating System The Assessment Consultant shall evaluate the HVAC system and determine the requirements for each building or building addition using the funding chart below. HVAC System Replacement $25.00 sf* (* includes demo of existing system & reconfiguration of piping layout, new controls for air conditioning and duct work) Convert to Ducted System Replacement: $ 7.50 sf* (* includes costs for vert. & horz. Chases, cut openings, soffits, etc.) Heating System (Only): $ 8.50 sf (for boilers, pump & piping replacement, not AHU) Controls (Only): $ 2.50 sf Assessment Cost Guidelines - 2009 * Does not include regional cost factor

  16. Strongsville City School District Assessment Summary

  17. Building Summary – Whitney Elem (41053 (1) BUILDING and ASSESSOR DATA (2) CEFPI APPRAISAL / REGIONAL COST FACTOR BUILDING INVENTORY DATA (4) (1) Building data, assessor data and assessment dates. (2) Includes building inventory details about all the buildings that were assessed. (3) Listing of each of the 23 building systems, rating and cost data. Each item is linked to a detailed description of the assessor’s findings and recommendations. (4) Council of Educational Facility Planners International (CEFPI) -- Appraisal is an instrument that yields data about the ability of the building to support the educational program. Each item is linked to a detailed description of the assessor’s findings. Cost to renovate “regional cost factor” applied. (3) 23 BUILDING SYSTEMS and COSTS

  18. Strongsville City School District OSFC DOES NOT SHARE IN *: Purchase of Land Offsite Utility Costs Performing Arts Halls (Fixed seat auditoriums) Bus Garages District Administration Facilities Stadiums, Tracks, etc. Desktop Computers / Software *list not all inclusive

  19. Strongsville City School District Renovations vs. Build New Ratio: Whitney Elementary 94% Allen Elementary 77% Zellers Elementary 77% Chapman Elementary 66% Drake Elementary 62% Surrarrer Elementary 40% Muraski Elementary 34% Kinsner Elementary 6% Center Jr. High 65% Albion Middle 57% Strongsville High 11%

  20. Strongsville City School District DRAFT Master Plans: The following Draft Master Plans are for discussion purposes only. These plans should be considered as a starting point as the Strongsville City School District partners with the OSFC to best meet the needs of the students and community.

  21. Strongsville City School District Draft MP 1 Scope: Renovations/Addition to Chapman Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations/Addition to Drake Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations to Kinsner Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations to Muraksi Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations/Addition to Surrarrer Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations to Albion Middle School to house grade 6 Renovations/Addition to Center Junior High to house grades 7-8 Renovations/Addition to Strongsville High to house grades 9-12 and CT Allowance to abate and demolish Allen Elementary, Whitney Elementary, and Zellers Elementary Schools Total Master Plan Cost: State Share: Local Share: LFI: Total Local Share: $98,925,892 $7,914,071 $91,011,821 $0 $91,011,821 Co-Funded 8% Co-Fundable 92% Co-Fundable; FY 10 Equity Ranking PALFI – n/a this plan Co-Fundable Local Share + PALFI Please note the PALFI detailed in master plan options is not inclusive of all Locally Funded Initiatives the district may choose to include in their project(s). Additional LFI scope should be discussed and budgets established with the assistance of the district’s design professional prior to finalizing bond language to secure the local share of the project funds. Master Plan utilizes District Accepted Enrollment Projections dated April 20, 2009 (2013-14 planning year). Approved Enrollment Projections will be required for final plan approval. EEA studies have not been completed on all existing buildings. Local Share percentage based on 2010 Equity Ranking.

  22. Strongsville City School District Draft MP 2 Scope: Renovations/Addition to Chapman Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations/Addition to Drake Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations to Kinsner Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations to Muraksi Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations/Addition to Surrarrer Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations/Addition to Albion Middle School to house grade 7-8 Renovations/Addition to Strongsville High to house grades 9-12 and CT Allowance to abate and demolish Allen Elementary, Whitney Elementary, Zellers Elementary, and Center Junior High Schools Total Master Plan Cost: State Share: Local Share: LFI: Total Local Share: $102,908,181 $8,232,654 $94,675,526 $0 $94,675,526 Co-Funded 8% Co-Fundable 92% Co-Fundable; FY 10 Equity Ranking PALFI – n/a this plan Co-Fundable Local Share + PALFI Please note the PALFI detailed in master plan options is not inclusive of all Locally Funded Initiatives the district may choose to include in their project(s). Additional LFI scope should be discussed and budgets established with the assistance of the district’s design professional prior to finalizing bond language to secure the local share of the project funds. Master Plan utilizes District Accepted Enrollment Projections dated April 20, 2009 (2013-14 planning year). Approved Enrollment Projections will be required for final plan approval. EEA studies will need to be completed on all existing buildings. Local Share percentage based on 2010 Equity Ranking.

  23. Strongsville City School District OSFC Annual Inflation Costs:

  24. Strongsville City School District Next Steps in OSFC Planning Process: • Develop Final Master Plan • Validate Assessment Scope (adjust scope and budget if required) • Evaluate Enhanced Reprogramming (incorporate scope and budget if required) • Evaluate Swing Space Needs (incorporate scope and budget if required) • Discussions on Site Safety Access Allowance (incorporate into plan if required)

  25. Strongsville City School District Questions?

More Related