170 likes | 368 Views
Safety and Mission Assurance Plan AMS-02 R EBASELINING O UTBRIEF July 15, 2004 NT/David Kaplan david.kaplan@jsc.nasa.gov 281-483-3729. Experiment. PIH. Is it safe?. Is it built right?. Will it work? . . .throughout its lifetime?. Experiment. PIH.
E N D
Safety and Mission Assurance Plan AMS-02 REBASELINING OUTBRIEF July 15, 2004 NT/David Kaplan david.kaplan@jsc.nasa.gov 281-483-3729
Experiment PIH Is it safe? Is it built right? Will it work? . . .throughout its lifetime?
Experiment PIH
SAFETY for both PIH and Experiment Milestones: Flight Safety Review – Phase II December 2004 Ground Safety Review – Phase II April 2005 Flight Safety Review – Phase III April 2006 Ground Safety Review – Phase III September 2006 Process: Payload Safety Review Panel [PSRP] point-of-contact: NC/Chuck Bailey Action: Preparation of all Safety Data Packages is the responsibility of Lockheed Martin Space Operations (LMSO)
Experiment PIH
ASSURANCE and RELIABILITY for PIH Evaluate Project Requirements Quality Evaluate Manufacturing/Fabrication Plans and Processes Define Inspection Requirements Engineering Approve Testing Investigate Non-conformances and Mishaps Support System Acceptance Reviews (SAR's) Conduct Pre-Shipment Readiness Reviews Manufacturing Inspections Quality Test Verification Assurance Program Stock Control Discrepancy Reporting Metrology Process Assurance Monitoring Clean Room and Laboratory Services QARC Document Processing and Maintenance Procurement Quality Assurance Fastener and Materials Testing Establish minimum reliability goals Reliability Support Requirements and Design Reviews Assurance Evaluate Project Requirements and Verifications Investigate Nonconfomances and Failures Approve Testing/Certification Analyze Software Requirements Software Evaluate Software Design Assurance Approve Testing/Certification
Endorsement PIH Experiment Comment Certification Yes Safety Only Limited Life Yes Yes* Hazards, FMEA’s Yes Yes Flight Rules/Crew Procedures Yes Yes ALERTS, GIDEP’s, TWX’s Yes Yes* ADP’s, TPS’s Yes Yes* H/W &S/W Noncomformances Yes Yes* Open FIAR’s Yes Yes* SPN’s Yes Yes* CoFR Endorsements *Indirect Involvement via SSP and ISS S&MA Organizations
Experiment PIH
Observation; On-Demand Selective Full On-Site Attend Independent Surveillance Quality Meetings Assessment System for Each Collaborator Cryogenics EMI & Thermal Pressure Structures EEE Parts Welding Non Magnetic Systems Systems Destructive Systems Evaluation (NDE) RELIABILITY and RISK MANAGEMENT for Experiment
Observation; On-Demand Selective Full On-Site Attend Independent Surveillance Quality Meetings Assessment System for Each Collaborator Space Arde, Inc., OHB GmbH, CAEN Carlo ISATECH Cryomagnetics USA Germany Aerospace, Gavazzi Engineering LTD, UK Italy Space SpA, GmbH, Italy Germany RELIABILITY and RISK MANAGEMENT for Experiment *Note: Sample list of manufacturers
Risk Cost Cost Risk Observation; On-Demand Selective Full On-Site Attend Independent Surveillance Quality Meetings Assessment System for Each Collaborator RELIABILITY and RISK MANAGEMENT for Experiment Recommendation: Selective Independent Assessment & Surveillance