1 / 34

Warm Yes, A = 10 km/s, B = 5 km/s

Warm Yes, A = 10 km/s, B = 5 km/s List at least two of the problems associated with seismic tomography Poor source/receiver arrangement, errors in time picks, errors in earthquake locations, can ’ t resolve sharp contrasts Rayleigh number: Viscosity, n

bridie
Download Presentation

Warm Yes, A = 10 km/s, B = 5 km/s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Warm • Yes, A = 10 km/s, B = 5 km/s • List at least two of the problems associated with seismic tomography • Poor source/receiver arrangement, errors in time picks, errors in earthquake locations, can’t resolve sharp contrasts • Rayleigh number: • Viscosity, n • Coefficient of thermal expansion, a • Thermal diffusivity, k • Temperature contrast, DT: E

  2. Convection and the mantle • Last time • Phase changes and their dependence on pressure/temperature • Claudius-Clapeyron equation • How are phase transitions affected by lateral temperature changes? • How do phase transitions affect convection?

  3. Mg2 SiO4: Forsterite (Olivine), ~60% of mantle 410 520? 660  ->  ->  -> perovskite Olivine spinel

  4. Graphite&diamonds consistent with whole mantle convection Velocity jump One chemical composition, Pressure-dependent change in structure Depth

  5. dP/dT > 0 (exothermic) dP/dT < 0 (endothermic)

  6. Subducting slabs Plumes From plumes.org

  7. Tetzlaff et al, 2000

  8. Tetzlaff et al, 2000

  9. Back to tomography • Neat results • First- order: • Ocean slabs cold • Problems • Source/receiver spacing • Particularly bad in oceanic islands (smearing) • “Kernel” • Banana-doughnut Van Der Hilst, 2002

  10. Back to tomography • Neat results • First- order: • Ocean slabs cold • Problems • Source/receiver spacing • Particularly bad in oceanic islands (smearing) • “Kernel” • Banana-doughnut Van Der Hilst, 2002

  11. Earthquake location: High frequency

  12. Fourier transforms: Any signal =  sines, cosines • More impulsive signals -> larger range of sines and cosines required • Noisy data, instrument response often mean only long-wavelength parts of seismogram are useful

  13. With ray paths, we only consider the first arrival (requiring infinite frequencies) • Energy that goes off the main path and takes longer is not considered, even if it alters the shape of the wave + =

  14. Brian Amberg, wiki commons

  15. Brian Amberg, wiki commons

  16. With waveform cross-correlation, the whole waveform is used, including effects from signal that arrives a bit later. • Waveform cross-correlation allows comparison of onset times using more than just the first arrival • Called “finite frequency” since we don’t necessarily have the infinite range of frequencies that are needed to reproduce sharp pulses

  17. From “Dahlen for dummies”, available online

  18. Banana-Donut kernels

  19. PP • Requires: • Good first guess at model • Good constraints on source size, location • Big computers • Results in: • More accurate models of mantle structure • More precise models, including better resolution of potential plumes/slabs (Montelli found many more plumes!) P

  20. D’’

  21. Seismic phases used in exploring D” Seismic-wave ray-paths from a deep focus source (circle) to a receiver (triangle). Core-grazing phases provide sensitivity to lateral heterogeneity and anisotropy in the D” region. D” triplication phases (from a discontinuous increase in velocity with depth) constrain the depth and strength of any discontinuities. Phases used to study the “ultra low velocity zone” (ULVZ) at the base of D” include short-period reflections (PcP) and conversions (ScP), as well as the long-period SKS phase and its associated SPdKS phase (involving P energy diffracted along the core).

  22. The main classes of D" shear-wave velocity structures. Schematic shear-wave velocity structures, shown as per cent deviations (VS) • Alaska and the Caribbean • Abrupt increase in Vs • Negative gradients in D’’ • Relatively cold in D’’ • Shear wave splitting at top of discontinuity (shown as fluctuations, may be caused by melt) • No ultra low velocity zone (ULVZ) • Central Pacific region • No strong discontinuity, but neg. gradient • Relatively hot in D’’ • Thick, pronounced ULVZ (5-30% decrease) • Laterally variable anisotropy close to base (fluctuations)

  23. Spatial patterns of seismological characteristics of the CMB boundary layer a, Regions with detectable ultra-low-velocity zone (ULVZ) in red, and sampled regions that lack evidence of any ULVZ are shown in blue. b, Regions with shear-wave anisotropy in D” are shown.

  24. The chemical heterogeneities schematically shown here could be due to: Partial melting core–mantle reaction products, slab-associated geochemical heterogeneities

  25. Attenuation of seismic waves •Some materials (e.g., hot and/or with lots of fluids) dampen seismic waves more than others • Seismic waves from South America felt more strongly in Canada than in Salt Lake City • Example from South America Key: Independent evidence, complementary to observed P and S wave travel times From: Myers et al.

  26. Global maps of attenuation •At shallow depths, similar to velocity maps: low velocities and attenuation beneath ridges; high values below continents •Evidence for super plume beneath south Pacific • Very difficult to resolve small scale structures like individual plumes Depends on many things, including heat flow….. From:Romanowicz and Gung, 2002

  27. Global Heat Flow •Highs at Mid-ocean ridges •Lows mostly over continents Think: convection heat vs. radiogenic heat? • Compare with solar radiation: ~1400 W/m^2, top of atmosphere • Total terrestrial heat flux average: 0.087 W/m^2 • Total Power ~40 TW From: Pollack et al., 1993

  28. Measuring heat flow • Simple equation, hard to measure • Need: T/x • T at two depths • But… • Hole disturbs T • May have to wait a long time • Local effects, advection? • Topography? K = thermal conductivity A=area T/x = temp gradient

  29. Measuring heat flow • Simple equation, hard to measure • Need: k • Can be measured in lab on real sample • Predicted based on lithology • Hard for marine samples, because pore fluids, compaction during extraction K = thermal conductivity A=area T/x = temp gradient

  30. Measuring heat flow • Goal: steady-state heat flow • Problems: • Seasonal/daily • T gradient depends on surface temperature too • T cycles penetrate to various depths, w/ various magnitudes • (take geodynamics) • Rapid sedimentation or erosion • If dT/dz is perturbed completely within the region sampled, estimates of heat flow will be biased

  31. North American Heat Flow •East of the Rockies controlled by: 1. ground water flow, sediments (e.g. Dakota high, Mississippi Delta low) 2. Crustal radioactivity (e.g., New England White mountains) •Complex effects of subduction: highs in volcanic arc, lows right above slab •High heat flow throughout west from various causes (Yellowstone, Rio Grande Rift, Salton Trough, Basin and Range) From:Blackwell et al., 2004

More Related