270 likes | 424 Views
Utilitarianism. Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey. John Stuart Mill. Born 1806 Son of philosopher James Mill Learned Greek and Latin as a child Administrator in East India Company Member of Parliament Died 1873. Mill’s Contributions.
E N D
Utilitarianism Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey
John Stuart Mill • Born 1806 • Son of philosopher James Mill • Learned Greek and Latin as a child • Administrator in East India Company • Member of Parliament • Died 1873
Mill’s Contributions • Defended phenomenalism, the view that physical objects are “permanent possibilities of sensation” • Developed “Mill’s methods” for inductive reasoning • Applied scientific method to social sciences • Refined and defended the principle of utility • Defended a strong libertarian principle • Argued for the equality of women • Promoted environment, population control
The Method of Ethics • No progress has resulted from all the work in philosophy directed toward finding the nature of the good • A problem is that we ought to know what right and wrong are before we can tell whether an action is right or wrong • But this is the reverse of scientific procedure, which begins with the particular and works toward general principles
Moral Sense • Some recent philosophers have postulated the existence of a moral sense or intuition • But a moral sense is not supposed to detect particular cases of right and wrong action, only general principles • So if there is a moral sense, ethics still proceeds differently from the sciences • Moreover, the intuitive school of ethics has never produced an adequate set of moral principles
A Priori Ethics • Some recent philosophers have held that the general principles of morality are discovered a priori • Most do not provide a single moral principle • Kant did produce one: the categorical imperative • But he could not successfully deduce actual duties from that principle • There is no logical contradiction in thinking a bad maxim as universal, only consequences no one would choose to incur
The Greatest Happiness Principle • Actions are right in proportion to their tendency to produce happiness • We cannot prove that happiness is the ultimate end of human action • But we can provide rational grounds for accepting that happiness is such an end • Mill begins with examples designed to clear up misconceptions
Utility • Utility is pleasure and absence of pain • It is not what is merely useful • Pleasure and the absence of pain is happiness • Human pleasure is not that of a swine, so the end of human action is not the pleasure of a swine • Human pleasure includes pleasures of • The intellect • Feelings and imagination • Moral sentiments
A Hierarchy of Pleasures • Some of these pleasures are higher than others • The difference is in quality • It is measured in terms of preferences of all or nearly all people • Some pleasures are so preferred that a considerable amount of discomfort is tolerated for their sake • Those of the higher faculties are preferred in this way by the competent, from their sense of dignity
The Base Life • “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied” • People do sink into a base life, but this is because they have lost their higher capacities • These are difficult to establish and easily wither away • Many distractions can drag us down • The preference for higher pleasures by at least the majority is good reason to think they are better
The Possibility of Happiness • The greatest happiness principle makes the ultimate end happiness, extended as much as possible to all humans or sentient creatures • Is happiness possible in human beings? • Mitigation of pain at least is possible • Happiness is not a life of rapture, but a varied life of pleasures mixed with few pains • If not for “the present wretched education and wretched social institutions,” this would be attainable by all
Two Chief Forms of Happiness • Most people have been satisfied by less than “a moderate share” of happiness • This is due to the fact that happiness has two forms • Tranquility • Excitement • Those with plenty of one can tolerate a large deficiency in the other • The two are complementary to each other
Conditions for Happiness • The greatest impediment to happiness is selfishness • The greatest aid to happiness is cultivation • Mental culture ought to be available to everyone living in a civilized country • Most of the great evils in the world can be eliminated • Poverty, by society and charity • Disease, by education and sanitation
Nobility • It is argued that it is moral to give up happiness and behave nobly • But noble action concerns the happiness or requirements for the happiness of others • The “noble” person who has some other ends “may be an inspiring proof of what men can do, but assuredly not an example of what they should.”
The Golden Rule • The rule, “to do as you would be done by” is a utilitarian rule • It expresses that the happiness of the whole of humanity is paramount • Utility would influence social institutions to promote happiness • And it would influence education to do so as well
Too High a Standard? • It has been objection that maximizing happiness is too high a standard for action • But ethics does not require that acting according to its standard should be one’s sole motivation • Utilitarians have always held that the motive of an action is not the basis of its morality, though it reveals the moral worth of the agent • Private utility, not universal utility, motivates most actions
Applying Standards • Utilitarianism seems to deem the coldly calculating person most estimable • But there is no necessary connection between virtues of character and goodness of action • All systems of morality have the problem that they seem to promote extreme behavior • It is better to err on the side of utility than the side of disutility
Godless? • Utilitarianism is charged with being a godless ethics • But it promotes happiness, which presumably is God’s end for humans as well • Strict versions of divine law are a matter of interpretation of God’s will • The utilitarian can interpret it as favoring happiness
Calculation • There is not enough time to calculate the effects on happiness of all our actions • But the whole history of humanity has made the calculations for us • When one considers murder or theft, this is not the first time it has occurred to someone • The beliefs which have come down through history are the rules of morality for the masses, subject to refinement by philosophers
Conflicting Considerations • A final charge is that utilitarians can do what they please in the name of utility • But every system of morality allows for exceptions due to conflicting obligations • These are the real difficulties in ethics • Utility can be invoked to resolve conflict • There is no way to do so in other systems
The Sources of Obligation • The question, “What is the source of obligation?” is common to all moral theories • Only conventional morality escapes it, due to its familiarity • For utilitarianism, it is a question as to why happiness should be promoted • The question would not arise if people became accustomed to promoting happiness
Sanctions • Utilitarianism has the same external sanctions as do other theories • Hope of favor and fear of displasure • Of fellow humans • Of God • Internal sanctions are those of conscience, which are very complex • Conscience is a subjective feeling in our minds • For utilitarians, this is a feeling for humanity • Even for Kant, there is only a feeling of duty
Society • Moral feelings may be innate or acquired • There is no objection to a feeling for humanity being innate • Mill believes the feeling for humanity is acquired, through development of our natural feelings • This is based on society among equals, which promotes the utilitarian principle • Social people pay regard to others “of course” • The moral feeling is strengthened with the advance of political improvement
Proof of the Principle of Utility • The only way to prove that happiness is the ultimate end of human actions is to note that it is what people actually do desire • This is compatible with the desire for virtue, which is part of happiness • The same holds for money, power, fame • Each contributes to happiness, which is “not an abstract idea but a concrete whole” • Virtue is higher, since it is never obnoxious
Justice • People think our feeling of justice indicates that it is objectively real • We get a conception of what we feel to be just by considering its many applications to • Liberty • Moral right of possession • Desert • Good faith • Impartiality • Equality • What do they have in common?
Justice Defined • Justice is commonly confused with ordinary morality • Its distinctive feature is that it involves a claim from someone as a moral right • We can only make this claim on someone who has a perfect duty to perform or not to perform an act • So, it is not unjust not to be beneficent
Rule and Sanction • The rule of justice is intended for the good of humanity • It is more vital to human well-being than any other principle of action • The feeling of justice is the sentiment that sanctions the rule: a desire for punishment of those who violate it • It arises from the impulse of self-defense and the feeling of sympathy