320 likes | 687 Views
2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 2. Radical Redesign - The SII. Standards Improvement InitiativeDuring 2008 the entire Hospital Standards manual was revised for 1/1/09Purpose was to clarify requirements, delete redundancies, and reorganize chaptersMany FAQs were rolled into the standards
E N D
1. © 2009 University HealthSystem Consortium Accreditation 2009 - A Joint Commission and DNV NIAHO Update
2. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 2 Radical Redesign - The SII Standards Improvement Initiative
During 2008 the entire Hospital Standards manual was revised for 1/1/09
Purpose was to clarify requirements, delete redundancies, and reorganize chapters
Many FAQs were rolled into the standards and elements of performance (EPs)
Life Safety Code (fire safety issues) chapter created
EC.5.20 with 4 EPs became 18 standards with 119 EPs
Part “B” of Statement of Conditions in past was surveyed without having formal objective EPs
Now these fire safety issues are represented in the new standards and EPs
2008 about 1,200 EPs – 2009 about 1560 EPs
More opportunities for a Requirement for Improvement (RFI)
3. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 3 2009 EP New Symbols Clarify Requirements and Criticality Indicates Situational Decision Rule Applies (12 APRs & 7 EPs)
Situations resulting in recommendation for PDA or CA
LS.01.02.01 Hospital has a ILSM policy for LSC deficiencies
Indicates Direct Impact Requirements Apply (325 EPs [+37 EPs 3/26/09] = 362)
A requirement for which noncompliance is likely to have direct impact on patient safety or quality of care
MM.04.01.01 –EP#8 Hospital Prohibits summary (blanket) orders to resume previous medications
Indicates Indirect Impact Requirements (1218 EPs)
Requirements if not met can reduce the quality of patient care or safety over time
The majority of EPs
Indicates that Documentation is Required
4. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 4 2009 Scoring “B” Elements of Performance (EPs) – Gone
“A” EPs – Score “2” or “0”
“C” EPs –
One or no occurrences of noncompliance = “2”
Two occurrences of noncompliance = “1”
Three or more occurrences of noncompliance = “0”
Though a “C” EP might be scored “1” the standard will be scored “0” in 2009
5. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 5 Levels of Criticality Example: Immediate Threat to Life – Inoperable Fire Alarm or Absence of Master Alarms for Medical Gas Systems
Situational Decision Rule – Unlicensed individual, who requires license providing patient care or the hospital provides inaccurate information during the survey
Direct Impact Requirement – Hospital Reassesses and responds to pts pain, based on reassessment
Indirect Impact Requirement – Pt. receives an H&P no more than 30 days prior to or within 24 hrs of admissionExample: Immediate Threat to Life – Inoperable Fire Alarm or Absence of Master Alarms for Medical Gas Systems
Situational Decision Rule – Unlicensed individual, who requires license providing patient care or the hospital provides inaccurate information during the survey
Direct Impact Requirement – Hospital Reassesses and responds to pts pain, based on reassessment
Indirect Impact Requirement – Pt. receives an H&P no more than 30 days prior to or within 24 hrs of admission
6. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 6 Accreditation Decisions Prior to 2009
Automatic thresholds were set based on the number of RFIs for:
Preliminary Denial of Accreditation (PDA)
Conditional Accreditation (CA)
Partially compliant standards were categorized as “Supplemental” Findings
Did not count toward any threshold
“Slap on the wrist” finding
2009
No automatic thresholds
No supplemental findings – all require post survey response (Evidence of Standards Compliance)
7. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 7 2009 Threshold Screens
8. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 8 “Black-Box” 2009
9. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 9 Hospital Deeming Application: January 2009 Update On July 15, 2008 the Medicare Improvements and Providers Act of 2008 became law
All accrediting bodies including TJC to complete a formal application to receive hospital deeming authority from CMS
Previously TJC had a unique statutory hospital deeming authority directly from the 1965 Medicare statute
On January 5, 2009 TJC posted New & Revised 2009 Accreditation Requirements
In preparation for TJC submission of its application to CMS for continued hospital deeming authority
New requirements will be reviewed by surveyors, but not scored until 7/1/09
10. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 10 New & Revised 2009 Accreditation Requirements Includes:
1 revised Standard
13 new Standards
25 revised Elements of Performance
140 new Elements of Performance
11. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 11 March 26, 2009Revised – Revised Accreditation Requirements After discussions between TJC and CMS a new set of revisions were released by TJC March 26th decreasing the requirements announced in January
Includes:
0 revised Standard
13 new Standards
16 revised Elements of Performance
71 new Elements of Performance
New requirements will still be reviewed by surveyors, but not scored until 7/1/09
Element of Performance scoring released April 7, 2009
CMS will be observing TJC surveys and central office between July and September of 2009
Final deeming decision by CMS to be made by end of 2009
12. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 12 New Standards - EPs Major revisions:
One single set of Restraint/Seclusion standards
Recognize doctors of osteopathy
Medical staff bylaws to include
Requirements for completing & documenting an H&P
Statement of duties of each category of MS
Must attempt to secure autopsies in all cases of unusual deaths
H&P conducted 30 days prior to admission requires update within 24 hrs of admission or prior to surgery whichever comes first
Pre and post anesthesia assessments required 48 hrs before and 48 hrs after
Policy for handling tissue specimens removed during surgery
Operating room register
Verbal Order documentation to include time received
13. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 13 NPSGs being reviewed during 2009 Over the next year, the current National Patient Safety Goals will undergo an extensive review. As a result, there will be no new NPSGs developed for 2010. Responding to concerns about the challenge some Goals represent and the need for information about effective approaches to addressing these challenges, The Joint Commission and its Patient Safety Advisory Group (formerly the Sentinel Event Advisory Group), which helps develop the NPSGs, are undertaking a thorough review of the goals and the process for their development. The NPSGs highlight serious patient safety issues that need to be addressed by health care organizations. As NPSGs have evolved over time, some have become more specific and detailed, and therefore, require more time and resources to implement
Currently not scoring Medication Reconciliation during surveys
14. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 14 DNVHC - Det Norske Veritas Health Carehttp://www.dnv.com/focus/hospital_accreditation/ Det Norske Veritas
The Norwegian Truth – est. 1864 in Oslo, Norway
International, independent, self-supported, tax-paying foundation; 300 offices in 100 countries and more than 9000 employees
Maritime, Health Care, IT & Telecom, Finance, Automotive, Food & Beverage, Transport, Energy
Operating in US since 1898
Among top 3 ISO Registrars in world
1200 healthcare organizations certified internationally
DNVHC - Offices Houston and Cincinnati
All American State Dept. facilities that provide health care are certified by DNVHC
September 26, 2008 CMS approved DNVHC granting it deeming authority for hospitals
15. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 15 DNVHC Accreditation Program NIAHO
National Integrated Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations
Integration of CMS Conditions of Participation (COP) and ISO 9001 Standards (for the formation and implementation of a Quality Management System)
16. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 16 What’s Different about NIAHO Accreditation? DNVHC trains one staff member as a DNV NIAHO – Surveyor – ISO 9001 Certifier
Organization pays only travel costs of training
Thereafter staff member must commit to 3 surveys per year
Surveys are conducted annually
45 days before or after last annual survey
No National Patient Safety Goals
Specific patient safety activities are left to the organization to determine
Tied to the organizations quality management system
ISO 9001
For NIAHO survey, no PDA or Conditional Status
17. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 17 Different about NIAHO Accreditation DNV Accreditation requires both
Compliance with NIAHO Standards, and
Compliance with ISO 9001 standards within two years of the first NIAHO Accreditation
Or a hospital may choose to pursue ISO 9001Certification
A more involved process requiring additional documentation and approval by a separate ISO Certification body
18. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 18 DNV NIAHO Accreditation Schedule Timeframe:
Year 1: NIAHO & Stage 1 ISO 9001 Surveys
Stage 1 is Gap Analysis of current compliance with ISO 9001 standards
Year 2: NIAHO & Stage 2 ISO 9001 Surveys
Validate ISO 9001 compliance
Year 3: NIAHO & Periodic ISO 9001 Surveys
A Periodic ISO Survey is a shorter focused survey
Year 4: NIAHO & Periodic ISO 9001 Surveys
Year 5: NIAHO & ISO 9001 Compliance or Recertification Surveys
Year 6: NIAHO & Periodic ISO 9001 Surveys
19. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 19 Change is inevitable,
except from a vending machine!
20. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 20
21. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 21
22. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 22 Top Standard RFIs – 2004-2008
23. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 23 Top Standard RFIs – 2004-2008
24. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 24 Top Standard RFIs – 2004-2008
25. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 25 Top Standard RFIs – 2004-2008
26. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 26 Top Standard RFIs – 2004-2008
27. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 27 2008 Most Frequent Joint Commission Hospital RFIs Crosswalk– 2009 Standard Numbers
28. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 28 NPSG Compliance 2003-2009
29. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 29 NPSG Compliance 2003-2009
30. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 30 NPSG Compliance 2003-2009
31. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 31 Retired NPSGs
32. ©2009 University HealthSystem Consortium 32 Acronyms used in this presentation