1 / 13

FP7

FP7. Proposal Evaluation Procedure. EVALUATION. Proposal Eligibilty Individual evaluation Consensus Thresholds Panel review Ethical review (if needed) Commission ranking Negotiation Commission funding (Rejection decision). Evaluation in FP7 Eligibility.

brita
Download Presentation

FP7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FP7 Proposal Evaluation Procedure

  2. EVALUATION • Proposal • Eligibilty • Individual evaluation • Consensus • Thresholds • Panel review • Ethical review (if needed) • Commission ranking • Negotiation • Commission funding (Rejection decision)

  3. Evaluation in FP7Eligibility • Minimum number of eligible, independent partners • Scope • Completeness of proposal (Presence of all requested forms) • Page limits • Deadline • Conflict of interest • Security Scrutiny (if needed) • Others (eg.. budget limits)

  4. The Experts • Wide pool of evaluators • Calls for “candidates” • Application via CORDIS • Commission invites individuals (Not self-selection) • Geography, gender and “rotation” also аrе considered • Expertise, and experience are paramount • Names published after the evaluations

  5. THE CRITERIA • Specified in the work programme • Adapted to each funding scheme and each thematic area • Can vary from call-to-call • Divided into three main criteria: - S&T Quality (Concept, objective, work-plan) - Implementation (Individual participants and consortium as a whole; Allocation of resources) - Impact (Contribution to expected impacts listed in work programme; Plans for dissemination/exploitation)

  6. CONSENSUS • Built on the basis of he individual assessments of all the evaluators • Usually involves a discussion • Moderated by a commission staff-member • One expert act as rapporteur • Agreement on consensus marks and comments for each of the criteria

  7. THRESHOLDS • Criteria generally marked out of 5 • Individual threshold = 3 • Overall threshold =10 • Can vary from call-to-call

  8. PANEL REVIEW • PANEL MEETING - Compare consensus reports - Examines proposals with same consensus score (if needed) - Final marks and comments for each proposal - Suggestions on order of priority, clustering, amendments, etc. • HEARING WITH PROPOSERS MAY BE CONVENED - Questions to the invited proposal coordinators - Small number of proposal representatives

  9. COMMISSION • Draw up final ranking list • Information to the Programme Committee • Commission decisions on rejected proposals • Contract negotiation • Formal consultation of Programme Committee (when required) • Commission decisions on proposals selected for funding

  10. FURTHER INFORMATION hhtp://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/

More Related