1 / 4

Managing Cyber-Identity, Authorization and Trust (and their inter-relationships)

Managing Cyber-Identity, Authorization and Trust (and their inter-relationships). Prof. Ravi Sandhu Laboratory for Information Security Technology George Mason University www.list.gmu.edu sandhu@gmu.edu. Problem Drivers and Consequences. PROBLEM DRIVERS

Download Presentation

Managing Cyber-Identity, Authorization and Trust (and their inter-relationships)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Managing Cyber-Identity, Authorization and Trust(and their inter-relationships) Prof. Ravi Sandhu Laboratory for Information Security Technology George Mason University www.list.gmu.edu sandhu@gmu.edu

  2. Problem Drivers and Consequences PROBLEM DRIVERS • Uncertain threat: We always fight the last war • Technological change: B2B integration, Pervasive (ubiquitous) computing, Peer-to-peer, grid and utility computing, Intel’s LaGrande and Microsoft’s Longhorn, the next Intel, Microsoft, Cisco, … • Business change: Outsourcing/globalization, Cost/ROI, federated identity (relying party is NOT the identity provider), identity grades (identity vetting, authentication strength, purpose, privacy all vary) CONSEQUENCES • The 3-decade old problem of managing identity, authorization and trust is rapidly becoming more difficult, challenging and essential • Real progress requires radical shifts in our approach and fundamental advances in basic research

  3. Radical Shifts: get real Focus on • what needs to be done rather than how it is to be done • real-word business requirements rather than hypothetical academic scenarios • the 80% problem rather than the 120% problem • soft and informal rather than hard and formal • constructing the policy rather than auditing the policy • constructive safety viapolicy articulation and evolutionrather than post-facto algorithmic safety • ordinary consumers as end-users and administrators rather than techno-geeks or math-geeks

  4. Radical Shifts: good enough beats perfect Real-world users Security geeks SECURE EASY COST System owner

More Related