150 likes | 319 Views
Regional Workshop: “Strengthening the Sustainability of Community-based Development through Social Entrepreneurship” Bratislava · 4 December 2009. Key research findings and regional trends. UNDP-EMES study. Preliminary mapping of the social enterprise phenomenon in CEE and the CIS
E N D
Regional Workshop: “Strengthening the Sustainability of Community-based Development through Social Entrepreneurship” Bratislava · 4 December 2009 Key research findings and regional trends
UNDP-EMES study • Preliminary mapping of the social enterprise phenomenon in CEE and the CIS • 13 countries investigated • Need for new research
Long lasting history of Third Sector organizations in the region • Poland: in 1927 3,539 credit cooperatives with over 1 million members; • Bulgaria: 1,600,000 people members of cooperatives at the eve of Communism rise to power; • Ukraine: in 1916 2,643 associations called brotherhood. Rich history contributed to the revitalization of the TS after the collapse of communist and socialist regimes
Current situation • Social enterprises still rare practice: • Poor understanding of the phenomenon • Lack of political and legal recognition • Difficulties in assessing the dimension of the sector • Social enterprises still far from being legitimized as actors of new welfare systems
Main development trends • Association and foundation main legal forms used by social enterprises • Limited engagement in economic activities allowed • Creation of subsidiary commercial enterprises to conduct economic activities (eg Macedonia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina etc.) • Negative image of cooperatives • Institutionalization of social enterprises • New legal frameworks introduced in Poland, Czech Republic, Slovenia, etc.
Main development trends • Social enterprise accepted when integrating disadvantaged workers • New legal frameworks • Cooperatives for the disabled inherited from Communist time • Role of social enterprises as social service providers overlooked
Endogenous and exogenous factors influence the development of SEs 1. Existence of cohesive groups • Authentic mobilization of citizens • Weak participation of local inhabitants can jeopardize the action of social enterprises • Rural versus urban localities
Endogenous and exogenous factors influence the development of SEs 2. Reliance on high stocks of human capital • High skilled workers employed, but weak entrepreneurial skills ans awarness • Educational and training programmes needed
Endogenous and exogenous factors influence the development of SEs 3. Predisposition towards social inclusion • Stigmatization of vulnerable groups hampering factors for social enterprise action • Social enterprises integrating homeless people, former drug addicts, and prisoners tend to hide their social goal • Necessity to carry out advocacy activities
Endogenous and exogenous factors influence the development of SEs 4. Existence of an enabling legal framework • Lack of adequate legal frameworks prevents the institutionalization of social enterprises • A significant number of social enterprises is doomed to perform in the underground economy
Endogenous and exogenous factors influence the development of SEs 5. Prevalence of fruitful interaction with public authorities • Good instances exist, but they are quite fragmented • Consistent and coherent policies towards social enterprises should be developed at all levels of government
Endogenous and exogenous factors influence the development of SEs 6. Adoption of pro-development policies by donors • Negative consequences when artifical development is boosted • Institutional and capacity building programmes highly valuable
Endogenous and exogenous factors influence the development of SEs 7. Pre-existing and recognized third sector • Existence of well developed third sector has paved the way for the development of social enterprises
Conclusions Similarly to Western countries, in CEE and the CIS SEs are a structural trend rather than a contingent phenomenon • Evolutionary dynamics context-specific • Specificity of social enterprises in transition contexts when compared to western Europe • Major differences among countries • Effective strategies and policies are needed • Value of research, workshops and capacity building seminars