180 likes | 263 Views
Dealing with central events in Run 10 Au+Au collisions. Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science. HBD Meeting, 2/6/2010. Clustering algorithm („Weizmann clusterizer“). loop through all fired pads (“CellList”): find pads with 3 pe < charge < 100 pe seed pads
E N D
Dealing with central events in Run 10 Au+Au collisions Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Meeting, 2/6/2010
Clustering algorithm („Weizmann clusterizer“) • loop through all fired pads (“CellList”): • find pads with 3 pe < charge < 100 pe seed pads • build clusters around seed pads by summing the first neighbour pads with charge > 1 pe • loop through the clusters („BlobList“) and merge clusters if they have overlaping pads • Matching of the CA tracks to HBD: • loop through the clusters again and find the one that is the closest to the track projection point M. Makek
Minimum bias data 200 GeV Au+Au nCentral = 278, nCells = 1655 M. Makek
Subtraction of pedestals • Method 1, define the average charge per pad: • Method 2, define the average charge per fired pad: • where a[pad] normalizes pad area • Look at the <ch>pp as a function of centrality (nCentral) • Derive this dependence module by module • Subtract charge from each pad according to nCentral M. Makek
Subtraction of pedestals 1 • Correction functions: all modules example: WN2 • Possible causes of variations: • zero suppression + gain difference • reverse bias voltage M. Makek
After subtraction of pedestals 1 nCentral = 278, nCells = 670 M. Makek
After subtraction of pedestals 1 • Run WIS clusterizer on subtracted data • Electron tracks • Matching distribu-tions for different nCentral bins • 3s cuts on hbddf and hbddz (mom. corrected) • Select only clusters with size > 1 pad • Subtracted random background gene-rated by projecting tracks to different module M. Makek
Subtraction of pedestals 2 • Correction functions: example: WN2 M. Makek
After subtraction of pedestals 2 nCentral = 278, nCells = 530 M. Makek
Summary • After subtraction of pedestals we do see electron signal in the most central events! • Even after subtraction we are still picking additional charge • (need to subtract more?!) • Needs to optimized: • S/B ratio is dropping for the most central events • Electron „efficiency“ decreasing for the most central events M. Makek
Outlook • Ideas to proceed: • Optimize subtraction empirically monitoring the electron efficiency and validating results with the Accumulator • Optimize lower threshold of the seed pad (e.g. 35 pe) • expected effect: low charge background reduction • Optimize upper threshold of the seed pad (e.g. 10050 pe): • expected effect: reduction of the high charge clusters • Optimize lower threshold for the neighbouring pads according to centrality • (e.g. 1 0.06 * nCentral). Expected effects: • reduction of the cluster size according to centrality • reduction of the cluster charge to centrality M. Makek
BACKUP slide: electron ID cuts • Using central arms: • quality = 31, 51, 63 • n0 > 2 • abs(emcdz+1.0) < 10.0, abs(emcdphi-0.00023) < 0.030 • ecore/mom > 0.6 • chi2/npe0 < 10 • disp < 5 • prob > 0.01 • ecore > 0.15 • Using HBD: • abs(phbdz) < 27.0 • remove tracks projecting to EN2 • 3 sigma matching in hbddz and hbddphi • HBD clustersize > 1 M. Makek