1 / 23

連欣瑜、邱子益、黃慈 宛、吳為 楷 、 張慈芳

連欣瑜、邱子益、黃慈 宛、吳為 楷 、 張慈芳. Agenda. Case summary. Strategy v.s Share price. PepsiCo acquired Quaker Oats Control 83.6% of the sports drink market . Company background. Coca-Cola. Products: Syrups Soft-drink Noncarbonated beverages .

brone
Download Presentation

連欣瑜、邱子益、黃慈 宛、吳為 楷 、 張慈芳

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 連欣瑜、邱子益、黃慈宛、吳為楷、張慈芳

  2. Agenda

  3. Case summary

  4. Strategy v.s Share price PepsiCo acquired Quaker Oats Control 83.6% of the sports drink market.

  5. Company background

  6. Coca-Cola Products: • Syrups • Soft-drink • Noncarbonated beverages Largest manufacturer, distributor, and marketer of soft-drink concentrates and syrups in 2000.

  7. Coca-Cola

  8. PepsiCo Products： • Snack food • Soft drink • Noncarbonated beverages • Snack food： • 2/3 of sales and operating income

  9. PepsiCo Roger Enrico(1996~2000) • In alliance with Starbucks • Sold off the fast-food chains • Brokered the acquisitions of Tropicana • Spun off capital-intensive bottling operations • Merge with Quaker Oats • ROEalmost doubled from 17% in 1996 to 30% in 2000

  10. competition

  11. Competition in Noncarbonated Beverages V.S.

  12. Question identify

  13. Which is more attractive? Use EVA to evaluate which is more worthy to invest

  14. Analysis & Conclusion

  15. Analysis • Step 1. CAPM • With risk premiums 5.9%

  16. Analysis • Step 2. WACC – Coca Cola • With tax rate = 30%

  17. Analysis • Step 3. NOPAT & IC – Coca Cola

  18. Analysis • Step 4. EVA – Coca Cola • 9 • .8

  19. Analysis • Step 5. WACC – PepsiCo • With tax rate = 32%

  20. Analysis • Step 6. NOPAT & IC – PepsiCo

  21. Analysis • Step 7. EVA – PepsiCo

  22. Analysis • In sum, we can get the following summary, • For comparison with Coke and PEPSI’ EVA expected performance, we discount them with year 2,000 WACC as discount rate. While  

  23. Conclusion • Growth rate of Coca-Cola EVA decreasing slightly from 2001 to 2003 • Discounted both firms’ estimated EVA in the lasting 3 years, we found out is higher than . • We believe Coca-Cola is more attractive for investors while both firms deserve investment.

More Related