290 likes | 477 Views
?it is reasonable that in whatever thing a person invests his services or his labour that very thing ought to pay him? Roscoe, Admiralty Practice, 3rd edn 1903, The Customs of the Sea.. Admiralty. Maritime lien for wagesWage priority before secured creditorsBroad definition of wagesDeveloped
E N D
1. Admiralty & Corporations Wage entitlements & priorities
John Levingston
10 February 2007
2.
…it is reasonable that in whatever thing a person invests his services or his labour that very thing ought to pay him…
Roscoe, Admiralty Practice, 3rd edn 1903, The Customs of the Sea.
3. Admiralty
Maritime lien for wages
Wage priority before secured creditors
Broad definition of wages
Developed by Admiralty Courts
Expanding with social developments
4. Corporations law
No lien
Wages come after secured creditors
Limited statutory definition of wages
5. The outcomes Admiralty
Wage entitlements fully paid
Corporations
Wage entitlements might not be paid
6. Why? Admiralty
Historical development
England since 1190
Helen of Acquitane brings the Laws of Oleron from France
Conflict between Admiralty & Common law
Private international law
Comity of nations
Beyond domestic policy and statute
7. Why? Admiralty
Royal letters patent, 12 April 1787
Jurisdiction of the Admiral and his Deputy, 13 Richard II Statutes 1 Ch 5
Jurisdiction of the Admiral, 15 Richard II Ch 3
Prerogativa Regis, 17 Edward II Ch 13
Admiral’s jurisdiction confirmed, 2 Henry IV Ch II
Admiralty Act 1690, 2 William & Mary Session 2 Ch 2
Admiralty Act 1844 (UK), 1861
Merchant Shipping Act 1894 (UK)
Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 (UK)
Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth)
8. Why?
Corporations
Domestic law
Statutory regime
Corporations Act 2001
Part 5.8A Employee Entitlements, ss596AA – 596AI
9. Why? Corporations
Statutory jurisdiction
Companies Act (UK)
Companies Act 2001 (Cth)
10. Common features Capital (the ship, the company)
no return without employees
International activities
Ship carries cargo between ports
Companies in global markets
Equitable jurisdictions
Gathering in assets and paying claims
Admiralty Marshal
Company liquidator
11. Admiralty Act 1988
General maritime claim, s4 and lien, s15
Master’s disbursements, s4(3)(r), s15(2)(d)
Wages, s4(3)(t), s15(2)(c)
Interest, s4(3)(w) (same priority as lien)
Legal costs (same priority as lien)
12. Admiralty Act 1988 Priority
Admiralty Marshal’s fees and expenses in the arrest and sale
Maritime liens, s15
Salvage, damage done by a ship, wages, master’s disbursements
No fixed rules: Thomas, Maritime Liens
Secured creditors
Unsecured creditors
Enforcement
Arrest of the res (ship or cargo), s15
Arrest of a sister or surrogate ship, s19
Court sale of the res (Admiralty Marshal)
13. Admiralty cases
Procedure
Master and crew lately employed upon the Ship Turakina
Master and crew can not be required to give security for costs
Admiralty Rule 76
14. Admiralty cases
Equity
15. Admiralty cases Wages – principles
Wages earned
Prior to voyage
During voyage
Leaving the ship
Dismissal
Desertion
Voyage ends
Wages – items
16. Admiralty cases
Maritime lien
Priority
Claims before wages
Claims after wages
17. Admiralty cases
Master’s Disbursements
18. Corporations Act 2001
Object, s596AA(1)
The object of this Part is to protect the entitlements of a company's employees
from agreements and transactions that are entered into with the intention of
defeating the recovery of those entitlements.
19. Corporations Act Special treatment?
… In the winding up of an insolvent company, where there is not enough
money to go around certain debts are given priority over others. That is the
function of s556, according to which priority is given to several classes of debt,
including debts due to employees. The rationale for the special treatment
afforded to employees is that they are in a vulnerable position if their employer
becomes insolvent: Australian Law Reform Commission, General Insolvency
Inquiry, Report No 45 (1988) vol 1, 294.
Commonwealth of Australia v Rocklea Spinning Mills Pty Ltd (Receivers and
Managers Appointed), Finkelstein J at [22-23]
20. Corporations Act Entitlements, s596AA(2) and s9
Wages
Superannuation
Injury compensation
Leave or absence
Retrenchment, defined s556(2)
Not include payment in lieu of notice and full redundancy
21. Corporations Act
Wages
Payable under an industrial award or industrial instrument
22. Corporations cases Bonus
Unspecified but payable on quantum meruit basis, Walker & Sherman v Andrew [2002] NSWCA 214
In respect of services rendered to the company, Re Galaxy Media Pty Ltd (Rec/Mgrs apptd)(in liq) [2001] NSWSC 917, Santow J
Staff equity sharing scheme, Biotechnology Australia Pty Ltd v Pace (1988) NSWLR 130
23. Corporations Act Debts due to employees
Contract of employment, s558
Continues in receivership, s419, McEvoy v Incat Tasmania Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 810
Continues in voluntary winding up, ibid
Deemed employment
Employed by liquidator, s558(2)
Cost of the winding up, s558(3), (4)
24. Corporations Act Superannuation
S556(2)
Same priority as wages
Superannuation contributions constitute an indirect form of employee entitlement but have been equated with wages, Ansett Ground Staff Superannuation Pty Ltd v Ansett Australia Ltd [2002] VSC 576 (20 December 2002); (2002) 174 FLR 1 per Warren J at [274] [275]:
25. Corporations Act
Retrenchment
Amount payable in respect of termination, payable before or after relevant date, s556(2)
Not include payment in lieu of notice and full redundancy
Hansen v Namoi Enterprises [2004] NSWSC 65
26. Corporations Act Priorities
Secured creditors
Unsecured creditors – debts and claims
Employees (arising before the winding up)
Chargee, floating charge
Other proved claims
27. Corporations Act inadequate Intervention by Executive Government
General Employee Entitlements and Redundancy Scheme (Cth) GEERS
Described in Cth of Australia v Rocklea Spinning Mills Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Apptd) [2005] FCA 902, Finkelstein J at [4 -7], [16]
28. Corporations Act inadequate Other solutions
Consistency with Admiralty
lien for wages
priority before secured creditors
Sons of Gwalia Ltd (Administrator Apptd) (ACN 008 994 287) v Margaretic [2007] HCA 1
Trade Practices Act, s82 damages
s52 (misleading and deceptive conduct)
s53B (misleading conduct in relation to employment)
s75B (person knowingly involved)
29. Questions?
Visit <www.admiralty.net.au>