1 / 11

EthiopiaRural Economic Development and Food Security Sector Working Group (RED&FS SWG)

EthiopiaRural Economic Development and Food Security Sector Working Group (RED&FS SWG). The Development and Implementation Structure of the Ethiopia National Agriculture Investment Plan. Dejene Abesha Gary Wallace RED&FS Secretariat. Introduction.

brooklyn
Download Presentation

EthiopiaRural Economic Development and Food Security Sector Working Group (RED&FS SWG)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EthiopiaRural Economic Development and Food SecuritySector Working Group (RED&FS SWG) The Development and Implementation Structure of the Ethiopia National Agriculture Investment Plan Dejene Abesha Gary Wallace RED&FS Secretariat

  2. Introduction Ethiopia has enormous potential for agricultural development. About 12 million smallholders produce 95% of agricultural GDP. Agriculture has a central role in the economic transformation therefore the GoE has given agriculture a priority consideration.

  3. Policies and Strategies • The major policy framework is based on the strategy of Agricultural Development-Led Industrialisation (ADLI). • A central pillar of Ethiopia’s development vision since 1990s, it envisages an economically transformed society within which agriculture will grow rapidly paving the way for industrial growth. • The government has formulated various policies and strategies where agricultural development and poverty reduction are given major importance.

  4. The Development of Ethiopia’s PIF (The CAADP Agricultural Investment Plan) • Sept, 2008 - CAADP Study initiated • July, 2009 – Comprehensive CAADP study reports produced • August, 2009 - CAADP Compact signed • August 2010 - Draft PIF finalized • September, 2010 – PIF, Implementation Roadmap and 1st year Action Plan produced • January, 2011- PIF implementation started

  5. Agriculture Sector Policy and Investment Framework (PIF) • Provides a ten year strategic framework (2010 - 2020) for investment and estimates of financing needs. • Guides the prioritization, planning and implementation of current and future investments that contribute to overall agricultural growth, food security, and rural development. • Investment framework to help mobilize additional global, regional and national resources for Ag Sector investments.

  6. PIF Goal and Objectives • The Goal of the PIF is to “contribute to Ethiopia’s achievement of middle income status by 2025”. • The Development Objective is to “sustainably increase rural incomes and national food security”.

  7. PIF Strategic Objectives and Priority Investment Areas

  8. RED&FS Background • Established April 2008. • One of 11 Thematic Working Groups associated with the Development Assistance Group (DAG). • Joint Government and Development Partner platform, bringing together the Ministry of Agriculture and 22 major multi and bi-lateral institutions engaged in the agriculture sector. • Government led and Development Partner supported.

  9. RED&FS Objectives • Improve communication and cooperation • Mobilize adequate resources in pursuit of Government identified development goals. • Improve harmonization and alignment of support for the Sector • Enhance Aid Effectiveness in line with Paris Declaration

  10. Policy and Investment Framework (PIF) RED&FS Executive Committee MoA RED&FS MDTF WB RED&FS MDTF Broad RED&FS Platform Cross-Sector Working Group Secretariat RED&FS M&E Task Force Technical Committee Sustainable Land Management Technical Committee DRM & Food Security Technical Committee Agricultural Growth Technical Committee Livestock AGP HABP SPIF SLMP PSNP

  11. Challenges • Harmonization requires time!!! • Agricultural harmonization needs to extend across many sectors. • Variable levels of commitment to harmonization. • Staff turnover results in the loss of institutional memory.

More Related