1 / 12

NA1-Technical Execution Plan Overview

NA1-Technical Execution Plan Overview. Open of PSC-05 Dubrovnik. Ioannis Liabotis Greece GRNET iliaboti <at> grnetSPAMFREE.gr. The SEE-GRID-SCI initiative is co-funded by the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures contract no. 211338.

brooklyn
Download Presentation

NA1-Technical Execution Plan Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NA1-Technical Execution Plan Overview Open of PSC-05 Dubrovnik Ioannis Liabotis Greece GRNET iliaboti <at> grnetSPAMFREE.gr The SEE-GRID-SCI initiative is co-funded by the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures contract no. 211338

  2. NA1 - What should be reported here, future plans • Some issues with partners PIC Numbers • Quarterly report production in Progress • Plans to address 1st periodic review recommendations

  3. NA2 - What should be reported here • NGIs progress and major differences since the review • Any corrective actions plan if required • Progress towards EGI membership • List of countries that are EGI members, EGI observers • BA?, MK? • Stimulate the inclusion of eInfrastructure strategy within national IT strategy plans • Progress on External Communities Identification

  4. NA3 - What should be reported here • Planning of National Events for 2nd year • Status of Planning of User Forum in TR • Status of VO Specific Training Materials • On line training material • Status of central web-pages (papers, ppts…) • ISGTW plans for applications – plan and follow up • Review recommendation: Dissemination of Scientific outputs. NA3 leader in collaboration with NA4 should reinforce this

  5. NA4 - What should be reported here • Overview of current status of all applications and metrics • Applications accounting status • Applications web pages status • Status of Involvement of Moldova and Albania in ENV VO with clear time plan towards finalization. • Plan for addressing review recommendation: New science produced from project, scientific publications (with NA3)

  6. NA4 - What should be reported here • Plan for Porting (Gridification) Guideline deliverable (M20) • TOC • Wiki Setup • Set possible assignments and deadlines for contributions • Report problems with resource allocations

  7. NA4 - What should be reported here: per VO • Overall status: • Meteo • Status of model porting for both applications • Status of implementation of pilot VO MoU • Seismo • Seismology data inventory status • Status of EIDA and ORFEUS collaborations • Environmental • MD and AL involvement • Status of CHERS • GENESI-DR collaboration status • ROMS application collaborations

  8. NA4 – Future Actions • Applications Deployment in production • Scientific PUBLICATIONS!

  9. SA1 - What should be reported here and future actions • Understanding of future operational model • VO resource allocation status and resolution of possible problems • SEEGRID VOs support at all sites: • Are all the sites used by the SEE-GRID-SCI Vos? • Are the Vos configured properly in all sites? • Tools status – Please check validity of all tools in wiki • Implement friendly names • Applications accounting

  10. SA1 - What should be reported and future actions • Core services in all countries • Helpdesk statistics to be provided, also SLA implementation of support related metrics • CIC Dashboard status • Follow EGEE Developments for EGI i.e. Nagios monitoring, Message queues, Integrations with GOCDB • Status and progress of Moldova Link deployment

  11. JRA1 - What should be reported here • Status of OT and AS reported • Internal Metrics reported • Status of ops tools • Security tool from SZTAKI • Indentify any existing problems with collaboration of OT/AS with applications • Define a clear plan for disseminating the JRA developments to other projects/user communities – Review Recommendation

  12. Thank you • Questions?

More Related