60 likes | 170 Views
Bulk Re-registration for Proxy Mobile IPv6. draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00 Fuad Abinader , Sri Gundavelli, Kent Leung, Suresh Krishnan, Domagoj Premec IETF #77, NetExt WG. 1. Baseline document. I-D draft-premec-netlmm-bulk-re-registration-03 accepted as NetExt WG item
E N D
Bulk Re-registration forProxy Mobile IPv6 draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00 Fuad Abinader, Sri Gundavelli, Kent Leung, Suresh Krishnan, Domagoj Premec IETF #77, NetExt WG 1
Baseline document • I-D draft-premec-netlmm-bulk-re-registration-03 accepted as NetExt WG item • Typos fixed; A few improvements, e.g. • # of transactions dependent on # of MAGs • 1 MAG <-> 1 LMA for a given bulk re-registration set • MN Group Identifier description and usage scenarios • Removed unused “Reserved” field description • Sub-type field (from MN Group Identifier field) now managed by IANA • Fuad Abinader as I-D editor
MN-ID • I-D: draft-perkins-mext-4283mnids • Proposes additional Identifier Types for the Mobile Node Identifier Option (RFC 4283) • At IETF 76, it was asked that it be merged with this I-D; agreed to take discussions to the mailing list, but there has been no follow-up discussion • As we can have different sets of IDs depending on policy, we consider this to be a totally different subject
Use of Bitmaps • Mohana Jeyatharan’s I-D on Bulk PBU (draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-bulkpbu-bitmap) proposes a group bulk operation • Based on redundant fields suppression using bitmaps • Proposes coexistence of group operations with single MN operations • Proposes bulk operations for other scenarios that this I-D does not cover • Relies heavily on “simultaneous” requests, while our I-D proposal does not rely on that
Next steps • Request reviews and input to improve the document and prepare for WG LC