1 / 20

Parties and voting

Parties and voting. Hiram Johnson and the Progressives of early 1900s. Middle class reform movement against: Control over government by elite special interests (SPR) Strong (corrupt) party “machines”, based on favors and patronage So favored: Accountable government

bruce-bean
Download Presentation

Parties and voting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Parties and voting

  2. Hiram Johnson and the Progressives of early 1900s • Middle class reform movement against: • Control over government by elite special interests (SPR) • Strong (corrupt) party “machines”, based on favors and patronage • So favored: • Accountable government • direct democracy—”people power” • Weak party organizations

  3. Partisan versus non-partisan elections • local elections and state judges are virtually all “non-partisan”

  4. State elections--More “Progressive” legacy • special elections • Called by governor or by petition • recall • Initiatives and referenda • (As opposed to usual way law is made--majority in one house, then other, conference, then signed (or vetoed) by governor) • The voice of the people or special interests? • Constraining the role of the legislature?

  5. Primaries and General Elections • Primary: Choosing the candidates to compete in the General Election • General Election: choosing among the candidates to hold office

  6. Partisan primaries • Federal and state offices are partisan • 1996 CA voters passed proposition for “open primary”—thrown out by USSC • Now we have “semi-closed” primary

  7. Redistricting • Every 10 years, after census CA legislature redraws district boundaries for themselves and CA Representatives to the House in DC “Gerrymandering”

  8. Example: 60% Rep and 40% Dem

  9. Version A--three safe Rep districts

  10. Version B--two safe Rep, one safe Dem district 1 3 2

  11. Gerrymandering, contd • Current trend: • Computers exacerbate gerrymandering • Types • Partisan • Racial • Incumbent

  12. Incumbency Advantage • Of the 101 CA incumbents who ran for reelection in 2002 and 2004, all were reelected, and 99 of these 101 incumbents won by landslides. • Why? • Self-fulfilling prophecy • term limits? • at state level, not federal • CA—6 ys Assembly 8 ys Senate, lifetime ban—most stringent in the nation

  13. Results of Term Limits • More diverse—20 Latinos • Citizen legislators?—not really • Of 40 Senators, 36 are former assemblymembers • Less experience and knowledge • From 1960s-1990s, CA often described as model “professional legislature” • Shorter time horizon • Increased power of lobbyists and advocacy groups • Increased power of Governor

  14. Who votes? • The old • The educated • The wealthy • The white

  15. Who Can’t • In CA— the convicted, while they are in prison lose the right to vote

  16. Campaign finance • Campaigns increasingly expensive--mostly for TV ads • Especially in CA

  17. Attempts to fix the problem • 1976 USSC throws out mandatory spending limits • 2002 Campaign finance--McCain Feingold • but campaign spending continues to grow

  18. Election Reform • Money--public funding for candidates--”clean elections”--including funds to match opponents private funding • AB 583 • More competition--redistricting reform • More choices--instead of “single member district winner take all”: • party lists, cumulative voting, choice or instant run-offs, etc. • see http://msnbc.com/modules/mockracy/

  19. Political Divide—recall election

  20. Method of voting • Growth of electronic voting • But big story—growth of voting by mail • Increased convenience resulting in greater turnout?

More Related