270 likes | 349 Views
Energy-Efficient, Large Distributed Antenna System ( L-DAS ) under revision for JSTSP Parts of this work have been presented at the IEEE GLOBECOM, Atlanta, GA, USA, Dec. 2013. Jingon Joung , Yeow Khiang Chia, Sumei Sun Modulation and Coding Department Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR
E N D
Energy-Efficient, Large Distributed Antenna System (L-DAS)under revision for JSTSP Parts of this work have been presented at the IEEE GLOBECOM, Atlanta, GA, USA, Dec. 2013 Jingon Joung, Yeow Khiang Chia, Sumei Sun Modulation and Coding Department Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR Internal Meeting with Prof. Tan Chee Wei 23 December 2013
Motivation • To achieve high spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) • For high SE • MU-MIMO: LTE-A beyond Re-7 • Distributed systems: e.g., coordinated multi-point operation (CoMP), LTE-A Re-11 • Massive (large) MIMO: recent trend • For high EE • Power control (PC): efficient-power transmission
Objectives & Contribution • study an L-DAS • provide a practical power consumption model • formulate an EE maximization problem • propose a suboptimal strategy including • Threshold-based user-clustering method • Antenna selection (AS) method • MU-MIMO precoding method • Optimal and heuristic power control methods • clarify the EE merit of L-DAS
L-DAS System BBU: baseband unit (signal processing center) IAD: intra-ant distance U users M antennas H: U-by-M MU-MIMO ch. matrix S: M-by-U binary AS matrix W: M-by-Uprecoding matrix P: U-dim diagonal PC matrix x: U-by-1 symbol vector n: U-by-1 AWGN vector
Power Consumption Model Power consumption TPI(transmit power independent) term TPD (transmit power dependent) term eRF (electric RF) oRF (optical RF)
Cont. • TPD term • TPI term Pcc1: eRF Pcc2: per unit-bit-and-second of oRF Ru: target rate of user u β>=0: implies overhead power consumption of MU processing compared to SU-MIMO
Problem Decomposition • Channel-gain-based greedy antenna selection
Cont. • SINR-threshold-(γ)-based clustering • SINR btw users in the same cluster < γ • SINR btw users in diff clusters > γ γ = 25dB γ = 32dB
Per-Cluster Optimization • Now, AS matrix is given • For fixed PC matrix, • ZF-MU-MIMO precoding matrix
Cont. • Now, AS and precoding matrices are given • Assumption: ICI is negligible • For SU cluster, • Optimal PC
Cont. • For MU cluster, • Optimal and heuristic PC methods
Numerical Results Single cell Single antenna for each user No adaptation for - # of antennas for each user - clustering threshold
Cont. • Iteration for • # of antennas • clustering threshold
Cont. • Example at cell boundary of two cells • Outage increase # of active DAs Circle: Non-outage user Circle color stands for the cluster/DA X: Deactivated DA Colored Square: Active distributed antenna (DA) Colored Thick Circle: Active DA allocated to the outage user Black Dot: outage user Circle color stands for the cluster/DA
Cont. • Outage
Cont. • Increase clustering threshold γ outage
Cont. • Increase # of active DAs outage
Cont. • Increase clustering threshold γ outage
Cont. • Increase # of active DAs outage
Cont. • No outage: threshold update (2,3) times
Cont. • Demo • cell_no_outage
Cont. • Demo • cell_outage
Remaining Issues for L-DAS • Deployment issues • Regular / irregular DAs • Cost • Synchronization issue • Signaling overhead • Outage reduction for collocated users • Asymptotic analysis