280 likes | 419 Views
Anti-glitch induced by collision of a solid body with the magnetar 1E 2259+586. Y. F. Huang Collaborator: J. J. Geng Nanjing University. Outline. 1. Background: glitches 2. Anti-glitch from 1E 2259+586 3. Our model: collision event 4. Discussion. 30 years timing history of PSR B1930+22.
E N D
Anti-glitch induced by collision of a solid body with the magnetar 1E 2259+586 Y. F. Huang Collaborator: J. J. Geng Nanjing University
Outline 1. Background: glitches 2. Anti-glitch from 1E 2259+586 3. Our model: collision event 4. Discussion
30 years timing history of PSR B1930+22 Espinoza et al. 2011 MNRAS
4 large glitches in the Crab pulsar Espinoza et al. 2011 MNRAS
More glitches Espinoza et al. 2011 MNRAS
Glitches of Magnetars RXS J170849.0-400910 and 1E 1841-045 Dib et al. 2008, ApJ
Explanations for glitches The origin is still debated: • Superfluidity: interaction of quantized neutron vortex lines with the neutron-rich nuclear clusters in the inner crust (Pines & Alpar 1985; Negele & Vautherin 1973; Pizzochero 2011) • Crust-cracking events (Ruderman et al. 1998) ? http://www.eskesthai.com/search/label/Bose%20Condensate Pines & Alpar 1985
Outline 1. Background: glitches 2. Anti-glitch from 1E 2259+586 3. Our model 4. Discussion
The Magnetar 1E2259+586 • P=6.979 s (v = 0.143 Hz) • d = 4+/-0.8 kpc • A few history glitches observed 1E 2259+586. Credit: ESA/XMM-Newton/M. Sasaki et al.
History glitches: 2002 outburst 2002 outburst On June 18 Woods et al. 2004
History glitches: 9 years overview 2002 glitch Possible micro anti-glitch? Icdem et al. 2012
An anti-glitch in April 2012 Archibald et al. 2013, Nat.
Timing events in around April 2012 Archibald et al. 2013, Nat.
+ x2=45.4/44 Model 1: Model 2: x2=38.1/44 + Archibald et al. 2013, Nat.
A hard X-ray burst: Exb=1.1e38 erg (36ms, Fermi/GBM,10-1000keV) An X-ray afterglow: Ex=2.1e41 erg (2-10 keV, Fx ~ t-0.38) Pulse profile: changed Foley et al. 2012 + x2=45.4/44 Model 1:
Possible models for anti-glitches Internal mechanisms • Internal superfluid spins slower than the crust? (Thompson et al. 2000; Garcia & Ranea-Sandoval 2014, arXiv:1402.0848) External mechanisms • Strong outflows (Tong 2013) • Sudden twisting of magnetic fields (Lyutikov 2013) • Accretion disk of retrograde matter (Katz 2013; Ouyed et al. 2013) Cannot explain the rarity or Not a sudden glitch, cannot explain the outburst.
Outline 1. Background: glitches 2. Anti-glitch from 1E 2259+586 3. Our model 4. Discussion
Our model: collision of a solid body with the magnetar Huang & Geng, ApJ, 2014, 782, L20 (arXiv:1310.3324)
Our model: collision of a solid body with the magnetar Huang & Geng, ApJ, 2014, 782, L20 (arXiv:1310.3324)
Our model: collision process broken up distance: Collision duration: (Colgate & Petschek 1981) Huang & Geng, ApJ, 2014, 782, L20 (arXiv:1310.3324)
Consistency with observations Association with an outburst Duration of the outburst (36ms) Energy release in the afterglow (2.1e41 erg) Amplitude of the anti-glitch ( ) Huang & Geng, ApJ, 2014, 782, L20 (arXiv:1310.3324) Credit: NASA http://www.futuretimeline.net/blog/2013/06/2.htm#.U9Mhi7flpQI
Outline 1. Background: glitches 2. Anti-glitch from 1E 2259+586 3. Our model 4. Discussion
Discussion: more collision events are possible Tremaine & Zytkow 1986, ApJ The capture radius could be as large as: 20Rns --- 80 Rns
Collision possibility • Asteroids disturbed by other planets? • Oort-like cloud objects scatterd toward the NS? • Collision of planets, generating small bodies? • Neutron star escaping its original planet system? • …… • Collision rate: 1 per 5,000 --- 3e7 years for a single NS. (Mitrofanov & Sadgeev 1990)
Collision-induced glitches/anti-glitches • Collision can produce either glitches or anti-glitches • They can be either radiatively active or inactive • Unlikely show any periodicity for a single NS • More likely happen in young pulsars than old ones • May have already been observed previously • A new method to probe the capture events of neutron stars. Thank You!