640 likes | 790 Views
Study of integron recombination mechanism and Integron use as a genetic shuffling device for biotechnological purpose. David Bikard dbikard@pasteur.fr Didier Mazel’s lab. 29.09.10 – Institut Pasteur. Multiple resistances : why so fast ?.
E N D
Study of integron recombination mechanism and Integron use as a genetic shuffling device for biotechnological purpose David Bikard dbikard@pasteur.fr Didier Mazel’s lab 29.09.10 – Institut Pasteur
Multiple resistances : why so fast ? Isolation frequency of multiple resistant Shigella (%) Production of antibiotics in Japan Resistance to 4antibiotics simultaneously Year Mitsuhashi S. et al., Jpn J Exp Med (1961)
Integrons Site attC n Site attC n+1 attC Stable platform Variable cassette array ORF ORF Pc Cassette n+1 attI IntI 2 major types of integrons • Multiresistant integrons • Chromosomal superintegrons Hall R., Stokes HW., Mol. Microbiol. (1989)
Multiresistant integrons • Bear antibiotic resistances (>130) • Small: up to 8 cassettes • Mobile : located on transposons and plasmids Partridge et al.,JR FEMS Microbiol Rev (2009)
Chromosomal superintegrons 175 cassettes 3% genome Vibrio cholerae O1 N16961 Mazel et al., Science (1998); Mazel, Nat Rev Microbio (2006)
Integron recombination sites The primary recombination site: attI The cassette recombination site: attC Cambray G., Guerout AM, Mazel D., Ann. Rev. Genet. (2010)
The integrase recognizes single stranded attC sites Double stranded substrate Single stranded substrate attC attI IntI IntI IntI IntI Francia MV. et al., J. Bact. (1999)
Conjugation assay Bouvier M., Demarre G., Mazel D., EMBO J. (2005)
The attC recombination site attCaadA7ds attCaadA7bs
The attC site Bouvier M. et al., Plos Genet. (2005)
Unconventional model of cassette Integration ? M. Bouvier, G. Demarre and D. Mazel, EMBO J, (2005)
How and when do attC sites fold ? C. Loot*, D. Bikard*, et al., EMBO J (2010)
attC folding probability base1 base2 P UNAFold Software Markham NR, Zuker M, Methods Mol. Biol., 2008 A17
Conjugation assay Bouvier M., Demarre G., Mazel D., EMBO J. (2005)
Conjugation assay (log) C. Loot*, D. Bikard*, et al., EMBO J (2010)
Conjugation assay Replication in the recipient cell _ + Replication can induce recombination
Leading / Lagging strand 10 10 10 • When the bottom strand is on the lagging strand, most recombination events happen during replication C. Loot*, D. Bikard*, et al., EMBO J (2010)
Recombination on the leading strand?Cruciforms? Free energy a ~ Ea dGc
Energy landscapes pVCR-GAA pSW97a Kcal/mol Kcal/mol 10 10 20 20 30 40 30 window size (bp) 50 60 40 70 50 80 90 60 position (bp) position (bp) Free energy of cruciform formation window size (bp)
Analysis of Covariance log(F) = μ + α log(VTSsize) + β log(A17) + ε μ = - 0.29 α = - 0.017 β = 0.48 R2 = 0.825 P-value = 4.7 10-9
Cruciforms formation in vitroS1 nuclease sensitivity C. Loot*, D. Bikard*, et al., EMBO J (2010)
Cruciform formation in vivo attC attI R6K P15A Pir-
Replication / Cruciforms • Replication is the “easiest” way to fold • Natural chromosomal integrons are on the “leading strand template” • attC sites can recombine as cruciforms, • Cruciforms fold more frequently than expected
ssDNA folding on the leading strand template: sensor of DNA damage ? D. Bikard et al., MMBR (2010)
Synthetic Biology:Engineering life In silico system design DNA synthesis Working system
Engineering approach Standardization Abstraction Decoupling
Engineering approach Standardization Abstraction Decoupling
Bottom-up engineering approach Danino et al., Nature (2010)
Combinatorial approaches Directed evolution MAGE: Wang & al. 2009
Reconstruction of functional tryptophan operons Integrase expression Selection on tryptophan-free medium D. Bikard et al., NAR (2010)
Recombination Frequencies Deletion of “useless” cassettes 3*10-3 D. Bikard et al., NAR (2010)
Recombination Frequencies Reordering event ~10-4
Recombination Frequencies Second reordering event ~10-5
Recombination histories D. Bikard et al., NAR (2010)
Tryptophan production TRP - TRP producer Fluorescence measurement
Combinations Phenotypes D. Bikard et al., NAR (2010)
Protein domain shuffling Polyketide synthetase attC site good protein linker