1 / 1

Model Reduction techniques. Applications to reactor scale-up.

Model Reduction techniques. Applications to reactor scale-up. Evgeniy Redekop, Palghat Ramachandran CREL Washington University in St.Louis, MO. Project Activities. Introduction. Application to Stirred-Tank reactors. - Oversimplified and phenomenological models often

buck
Download Presentation

Model Reduction techniques. Applications to reactor scale-up.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Model Reduction techniques. Applications to reactor scale-up. Evgeniy Redekop, Palghat Ramachandran CREL Washington University in St.Louis, MO Project Activities Introduction Application to Stirred-Tank reactors - Oversimplified and phenomenological models often fail to predict chemical reactor behavior accurately. - Formulate and solve a detailed model of a single phase Stirred Tank reactor accounting for micromixing As a starting point of the project a single phase Stirred-Tank reactor was chosen because of the following: -The detailed models of chemical reactors (CFD, CDR, etc.)‏ require enormous computational time and are infeasible for optimization, scale-up, and control tasks. This is especially true in case of reactors characterized by complex reaction schemes and multiphase reactors. - Use preferably an open source software (e.g. OpenFOAM, Scientific Python)‏ for all numerical computations, so that modular extensions are possible - While it is relatively simple device, the flow in it can exhibit a complex behavior effecting the reactor performance - Extensive literature on the subject is available containing both experimental and numerical data for comparison - Derive the reduced model using such techniques as Spacial Averaging, Proper Orthogonal Decomposition, etc. - Reliable reduced models can facilitate the development and scale-up of new efficient processes. - Compare the results given by the reduced model to the results given by the original detailed model and the Compartmental Model A Compartmental model of a single phase Stirred-Tank reactor was recently proposed by Guha, et. al. (2006) which can be used as a reference point for an evaluation of the results of this project - Such models should meet the following criteria: - Apply the work to the multi phase reactors (liquid-gas, liquid-solid, fluidized beds)‏ Derived from the detailed model based on the 'first principles' Predict the reactor behavior well enough Require reasonable computational time D. J. Lamberto et al. / Ch. Eng. Sc. 56 (2001)‏ Spacial Averaging Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Model Hierarchy POD reduction of the model involves: (Shvartsman, 1998) CDR equations are averaged over the cross section in which the local diffusion prevails over the reaction. 1. Formation of a database ensemble of spatiotemporal data (obtained from integration of the full model or experimentally) Lyapunov-Schmidt theory was suggested by Balakotaiah, et. al. (2005) as a unified framework for model reduction via spacial averaging. The method was applied to tubular, stirred-tank, monolith, and other reactor types. 2. Extraction of an empirical eigenfunction basis from the data Fluidized Bed snapshots - The model can be truncated to an arbitrary accuracy 3. Projection of the original model onto the low-dimensional space of the eigenmodes - The reduced model retains all parameters of the original model and is valid for a wide range in a parametric space Some of the advantages include: - POD modes form an optimal basis for a decomposition, i.e. no other orthonormal set converges faster Balakotaiah, et al. / Ch. Eng. Sci 58 (2003)‏ First three POD eigenmodes References - Analyticity of the reduced model is advantageous for model analysis - No a priory knowledge of the time/space scale separation is necessary D. J. Lamberto, et al. , “Computational analysis of regular and chaotic mixing in a stirred tank reactor”, Ch. Eng. Sci.,56, (2001) - The model can be truncated to an arbitrary accuracy Application to a tubular reactor the method yields hyperbolic equations more accurately describing dispersion effects than traditional parabolic models D. Guha, M. Dudukovic, and P. Ramachandran, “CFD-Based Compartmental Modeling of Single Phase Stirred-Tank Reactors”, AIChE, 52 (5), (2006)‏ - The technique can utilize experimental data along with numerical simulation S. Y. Shvartsman and I. G. Kevrekidis, “Nonlinear Model Reduction for Control of Distributed Systems: a Computer-Assisted Study”, AIChE, 44 (7), (1998)‏ - The technique is proven to be useful in a variety of engineering disciplines Application to a Stirred-Tank reactor LS averaged model accounts for a micromixing and correctly predicts multiplicity of steady states for non isothermal regime P. G. Cizmas, et al., “Proper-orthogonal decomposition of spatiotemporal patterns in fluidized beds”, Ch. Eng. Sci., 58, (2003)‏ - The method is applicable to the complex geometries of the flow S. Chakraborty and V. Balakotaiah, “Spatially Averaged Multi-Scale Models for Chemical Reactors”, Adv. in Ch. Eng., 30, (2005)‏ Energy spectrum of POD basis P. G. Cizmasa, et al. / Ch. Eng. Sci 58 (2003)‏ V. Balakotaiah, et al., “Averaging theory and low-dimensional models for chemical reactors and reacting flows”, Ch. Eng. Sci., 58, (2003)‏

More Related