290 likes | 541 Views
Investigating the efficacy and tolerability of combining clozapine and aripiprazole in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. The study design, patient characteristics, scales used for assessment, results, and conclusions are outlined.
E N D
Effect of Aripiprazole Augmentation of Clozapine in Schizophrenia: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Journal Club Psychiatry rotation
Background 15-20% of patients have poor outcome, treatment resistant 30-50% of treatment resistant patients only partially responsive to clozapine Lack of evidence on efficacy & tolerability of combination treatment with clozapine Case reports, open-label studies & case series on clozapine + aripiprazole: promising therapeutic strategy in residual & treatment-resistant patients
Clozapine • Weak antagonist at: • D1, D2, D3, and D5 • Antagonist at D4: High affinity • Antagonist at 5-HT2A, alpha-adrenergic, H1& cholinergic receptors
Aripiprazole • 2nd generation APs: High 5HT2:D2 affinity ratio, lower affinity for D2 • Aripiprazole: Low 5HT2: D2 affinity ratio, higher affinity for D2 • Partial agonist at pre & post synaptic D2 receptors hypothesized to exert: • Functional antagonist in a hyperdopaminergic environment • Functional agonist in a hypodopaminergic environment
Aripiprazole • Partial agonist: 5-HT1A • Antagonist at 5-HT2A receptors in mesocortical tract • postulated to ↑ dopamine release and ↓ negative symptoms • Comparable efficacy to other antipsychotics for +ve symptoms. • May be beneficial for cognitive, negative & mood symptoms
Pharmacokinetics • F = 87% • Mean T1/2 = 75 hrs • Mean Tmax = 3.0 hrs • Time to steady state ~ 14 days • Dose proportional Cmax & AUC b/w 5 mg and 30 mg daily • No dose adjustment for renal or hepatic insufficiency
Study Design Patients: Treatment resistant schizophrenic patients Intervention: Aripiprazole Comparison: Placebo Outcome: Clinical symptomatology & executive cognitive functioning
Study Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Until Week 12: 10 mg/day After Week 12: 15 mg/ day 5 mg/day of lorazepam allowed for insomnia or agitation
Study Design • 10 visits: • Initial screening (week 1) • Randomization (week 0) • 8 further visits at wks 2,4,8,12,16,20 & 24 • Data for clinical & neurocognitive assessments collected @ wks 0,12 and 24
Inclusion Criteria Met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia Positive & negative symptoms despite an adequate trial of clozapine Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: >25 partial-responders or non-responders
Exclusion Criteria Any major psychiatric disorder Significant concurrent medical illnesses Organic brain disorder Hx of substance & alcohol abuse Mental retardation Pregnant or lactating women No Anti-Depressant or Anti-Convulsant for 2 months before study
Patient Characteristics On clozapine monotherapy at highest tolerable range (200-450 mg/day) for at least 1 year Dose stable for at least 1 month Dose unchanged throughout the study
Scales Used to Test Efficacy (Psychopathological) BPRS: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale SANS: Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms SAPS: Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms CDSS: Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia
Scales Used to Test Efficacy (Neurocognitive) WCST: Wisconsin Card Sorting System Verbal Fluency Test Stroop Colour-word Test
Demographic & Clinical Characteristics of the Clozapine Groups
Lorazepam Use for Insomnia or Agitation • Aripiprazole group: • Patient 1 = 2.5 mg/day • Patient 2 = 5 mg/day • Placebo group: • Patient 1,2 = 2.5 mg/day • Patient 3 = 5 mg/day • Small N, no statistical analyses performed
Results • Positive symptoms: Aripiprazole > Placebo • SAPS total scores • Domains delusions & bizarre behaviour • Negative symptoms: Aripiprazole > Placebo • Single domain of alogia • Lower reduction than expected • Mild negative symptoms • ↑ in overall psychopathological state: Changes in BPRS • Affective symptomatology: No changes in CDSS
Results • Positive & general psychopathological symptomatology: Beneficial effect • Executive cognitive functions: No significant effects • Safety: generally well-tolerated • Most common SEs: restlessness (N=5, 35.7%), insomnia (N=3, 21.4%), nausea (N =1, 7.1%)
Results from other studies • Double-blind RCT (Chang et al.): No advantage for total symptom severity • Secondary analyses: Significant ↑ in negative symptoms and overall clinical state (BPRS scores) • Limited evidence on cognition • Open label RCT, N= 169 • ↑ in general cognitive functioning • Significant ↑ in verbal learning • Case report: ↑ in verbal memory, reaction time, quality/attention
Investigators’ Conclusion Combination well-tolerated May be of benefit for patients partially responsive to clozapine monotherapy Further double-blind, placebo controlled trials in a larger number of patients required
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist Did the study ask a clearly focused question? Yes Was this a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and was it appropriately so? Yes Were participants appropriately allocated to intervention and control groups? Yes Were participants, staff and study personnel ‘blind’ to participants’ study group? Yes Were all of the participants who entered the trial accounted for at its conclusion? Yes
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist Were the participants in all groups followed up and data collected in the same way? Yes Did the study have enough participants to minimize the play of chance? No How are the results presented and what is the main result? Augmentation beneficial for on positive & general psychopathological symptomatology No significant effects regarding executive cognitive functions How precise are these results? Were all important outcomes considered so the results can be applied? Concurrent medical conditions, medications
Limitations Small sample size Relatively low dose of aripiprazole May have prevented enhanced therapeutic effects No discussion regarding biphasic titration Practice effects No information on clozapine levels Patient status: smoker vs. non-smoker
Limitations • SEs data: • No data regarding metabolic SEs • Clinical interview • Non-specific questioning • No formal psychometric measure of EPS • Inter-rater reliability not established by formal training
Implications to Practice Polypharmacy not the best option in terms of antipsychotics Trial in patients with partial response to clozapine More RCTs required