Case studies of Joint Programmes

1. Case studies of Joint Programmes • Why – relevance, efficiency, effectiveness and development impact of joint programmes; focus on the modality • Where – 14 countries, all regions, range of sectors • How – local consultants, principal consultant in HQ, supported by UNDGO and Joint Programmes working group

2. Characteristics of JPs in the case studies • Strengthen partnerships amongst UN agencies • They are of short duration, often extended in phases, and can be unfocused • The guidelines do not facilitate a programme approach • JPs are not usually the result of the UNDAF/ JSM process – often the reverse

3. Selected findings • There is some evidence that JPs can leverage resources, reduce transaction costs for national partners and reduce duplication • ‘True’ JPs can be a useful way to address complex development challenges • It is useful to have a range of options for joint working

4. Some conclusions • JPs need to be embedded in the UNDAF process • The JSM is a unique opportunity to involve non-resident agencies, and to link JPs to national processes such as SWAps • Certain conditions support JPs: complex development challenge, institutional support, assured resources, a joint assessment of the problem and clear strategic objectives