1 / 18

Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework

Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework. Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee March 14, 2011. Statutory Requirements. MGL, Chapter 69, Section 1B Establish guidelines Encourage districts

Download Presentation

Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee March 14, 2011

  2. Statutory Requirements • MGL, Chapter 69, Section 1B • Establish guidelines • Encourage districts • MGL, Chapter 71, Section 38 • Comprehensive system • Performance standards • Annual evaluation – administrators & teachers without Pts • At least biannual evaluation – teachers with PTS

  3. Teachers High Expectations Curriculum & Instruction Assessment Reflective Practice Professional Responsibility Administrators Instructional Leadership Management and Operations Family and Community Relations Reflective Practice Professional Responsibility Standards of Professional Practice

  4. Teachers Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment Teaching All Students Family & Community Engagement Professional Culture Administrators Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment OR Instructional Leadership Supporting Teaching & Learning Family & Community Engagement Professional Culture Standards - adopted

  5. Teacher & Administrator Evaluation Framework

  6. + Judgments about Practice Observations of Practice & Examination of Artifacts Such as… Self-Assessment Formal Observations Informal Observations Walk-throughs Instructional Rounds Such as… Lesson Plans Assignments Assessments IEPs/504 Plans School Improvement Plans

  7. Validate Judgments about Practice Measures of Student Learning and Outcomes Such as… Teacher-created assessments Projects, reports, performances District-developed assessments Growth trends on state assessments Graduation & promotion rates

  8. Validate Judgments about Practitioner Evidence of Contributions to School or Profession Such as… Curriculum Development Committee Work Grade level team work Conference attendance Student teacher supervision Staff developer

  9. Significance • The Massachusetts Race to the Top application uses the word significant without definition. • The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines significant as • having meaning; • having or likely to have influenceor effect:important • probably caused by something other than mere chance

  10. Four Performance Categories

  11. Evaluation by Standard

  12. Professional Growth Plans

  13. Application

  14. Personnel Decisions • To achieve PTS, Proficient on all four standards. • To advance into leadership roles – teacher leader and administrative positions – three years of Proficient or Exemplary on all four standards. • See career roles on pages 36-38 in MTA policy brief.

  15. Evaluation Rating Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary Unsatisfactory 1-Year Improvement Plan 2-Year Self-Determined Growth Plan Eligible for Additional Roles & Responsibilities: e.g. Teacher Leader, Administrator, Promotional Positions 1-Year Directed Growth Plan Improves Does Not Improve Recommended for Professional Teacher Status Does Not Improve Dismissed or Demoted Evaluation Cycle

  16. Observer Preparation • All observers must earn a DESE approved endorsement to their license. • Adult Learning Theory • Conducting Difficult Conversations • Observing Practice • Developing Professional Growth or Improvement Plans • Two demonstrations of learning • Inter-rater reliability test observing videotaped practice using standard rubric. • Develop a PGP.

  17. Endorsements of MTA Plan • Linda Darling-Hammond • Charlotte Danielson • Susan Moore Johnson • Julia Koppich • Jillian Darwish • Peter McWalters

  18. Any Questions??

More Related