1 / 8

API Standard 6X: API/ASME Design Calculations

API Standard 6X: API/ASME Design Calculations. New Draft Standard under Subcommittee 6. Task Group Membership. John Fowler – On-Line Resources - Chairman Jim Britton – Cameron – 17D and 16C Paul Bunch – Cameron – 16A and 17D Jean Brunjes – GE – 6A Bill Carbaugh – GE – 16A

burton
Download Presentation

API Standard 6X: API/ASME Design Calculations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. API Standard 6X: API/ASME Design Calculations New Draft Standard under Subcommittee 6

  2. Task Group Membership • John Fowler – On-Line Resources - Chairman • Jim Britton – Cameron – 17D and 16C • Paul Bunch – Cameron – 16A and 17D • Jean Brunjes – GE – 6A • Bill Carbaugh – GE – 16A • Maynard Chance – West Engineering – All specs • Chris Johnson - NOV – 16A • Jim Kaculi – DrilQuip – 17D • Chris Kocurek – Cameron – 17D • John McCaskill - Expro – 16C • Nigel McKie – FMC – 17D • Mark Miser – DNV – All specs • Ramon Sanpredro – Stress Engineering – all specs • AlirezaShirani – GE – All specs

  3. History and Objective • API 6A, 16A, and 16C referenced the ASME Code Section VIII Division 2, 2004 Edition, Appendix 4. • Since referencing an obsolete spec is awkward, an Annex (Annex I) was prepared for 16A capturing the method from that ASME Appendix. • Subcommittee 6 proposed that the method be put in a separate document to assure uniformity.

  4. Task Group Charge • Create a new API standard documenting the rules of the ASME Code, based on Annex I. • Problem: 16A and 6A used different allowable stresses.

  5. Resolution • The task group consensus was to use the rules of 16A, since going to the slightly more conservative 6A rules would penalize 16A/16C users who had designed to higher allowable stresses. • The 90% of Sy used in 16A and 16C is the same as the limit in the 2004 ASME Code Section VIII Division 2 • Using only the yield strength as a basis follows Section VIII Division 3 practice.

  6. Changes to Annex I • Several revisions were made to the Annex I document to clarify the requirements, including several changes to the wording.. • Information of elastic-plastic collapse was added to the document. ASME Appendix 4 had referred to a method in Appendix 6 on experimental stress analysis. • The uses of limit analysis and elastic/plastic analysis were clarified. • The requirement on the sum of the three principal stresses was clarified as to the calculation basis.

  7. Follow-on actions after publication of the new Standard • Specifications 6A, 16A and 16C should revise their design section to direct the designer to this new standard instead of the 2004 Code. • This may require several changes in the body of the specifications. • Since 17D refers to 6A for design requirements, no change is needed. • The1004 ASME Code Section VIII Division 2 can be removed as a referenced standard, and Standard 6X added.

  8. Status of the draft Standard • The TG has finalized the draft and agreed it is ready for ballot. • API will edit the document into standard API format and return it to the TG for review. • After review the draft standard will be sent out for ballot by SC6. • SC 16 and SC 17 will solicit comments from their member companies, which will be considered along with those from SC6 members.

More Related